• mrbigcheese [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Not only that, but the Bund had like tens of thousands of members, maybe over 100k. The largest rally was over 20k at madison square garden and this went in on NYC till the war started. They even sent their kids to nazi summer camps. La Guardia actually led massive rallies against them at the time since he was outspoken against Hitler very early on.

        https://mashable.com/2016/07/27/nazis-madison-square-garden/

        https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2017/06/american-nazis-in-the-1930sthe-german-american-bund/529185/

    • CoralMarks [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      Although I think those here were not Nazis, for example not in the picture but in the clip linked someone holds a sign saying: "Arm Britain and Prolong the War"
      They just didn't want to be physically involved.

  • mrbigcheese [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Interesting enough the communist party also openly opposed us intervention into the war until Barbarossa happened because it thought it would only be done to follow imperialist interests. It was actually the Comintern that kept the party line as being against joining the war.

    • extraterrestrial5 [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      because it thought it would only be done to follow imperialist interests

      Haha yes, unlike what happened in reality

      • limette [she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        I don't think it really matters when there's, y'know, the Nazis to stop. Any amount of imperialism is better than that.

        • mrbigcheese [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Yeah its worth noting too that the communist party supported intervention before the war started.

    • skollontai [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Yeah, and the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact did a lot of damage to the credibility of the Party in the US. Don't know about this specific protest, but liberals were the biggest pro-war faction in the US until Pearl Harbor (opposed by isolationist conservatives, fascist sympathizers, and communists). The original post here is ahistorical and uses the word "liberal" with about the same level of finesse as Fox News... just "things I don't like."

      • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yeah the party began to be seen as weak on fascism and just an arm of Moscow, which was obviously not popular among most American Communists. The extremely quick about face when Barbarossa happened just cemented the idea that working for the CPUSA was just being a pawn for Russian interests rather than working for liberation in the US. One of the many unfortunate consequences of the geopolitical realities at the time wrt Communism.

      • Gorn [they/them,he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Um, excuse me? This joke makes light of my very serious assertion, sir, which I take as a violation of the NAP. I'll see you in privatized arbitration, sleepyhead!

        We all have a fundamental human right to NAP, so I hope you enjoy yours.

  • OgdenTO [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Is this the same people who protest in favor of attacking socialist governments, and are pro war in China and DPRK?

  • Lerios [hy/hym]
    ·
    4 years ago

    americans, when germany is openly doing genocide: now let's not rush in to doing something crazy like staring an unnecessary interventionalist war over something that isn't our business

    americans, when the middle east exists: REEEEEEEEEEEEE