haha Getting the imperial core to give you its manufacturing base in exchange for stabbing the USSR in the back and isolating them haha so based so cool
Blaming the Sino-Soviet split on Deng is revisionist. If we're looking at results, China still exists and the communist project there is doing great. Have you checked in on the USSR recently?
haha Getting the imperial core to give you its manufacturing base in exchange for stabbing the USSR in the back and isolating them haha so based so cool
fuck Deng.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
The Sino-Soviet split was led more by the Soviets than China and the bulk happened before Deng.
It wasn't Deng that stabbed the USSR in the back though lol, if anything Deng's shitty foreign policy carried over from Mao
Mao might have started it but Deng rubberstamped the sino-soviet split after his meeting with Khruschev.
deleted by creator
Before he became Chairman, Deng was still in his mother's womb and not part of the Chinese leadership and head of the military. Everyone knows that.
deleted by creator
Yeah the USSR of the 80s was definitely worth dealing with and not entirely revisionist and crumbling. Lmao
Calling Gorby and Khrushchev revisionist and stanning literal state capitalist Deng. How that does that fucking work in your brains lmao?
China is still around and thriving largely because of Deng. Changing tactics isn't revisionism, attempting to rewrite history is.
All you're doing is using marketing language.
Blaming the Sino-Soviet split on Deng is revisionist. If we're looking at results, China still exists and the communist project there is doing great. Have you checked in on the USSR recently?
What's revisionist is criticising USSR for deStalinization and then proceeding to do the same thing to Mao's policies.
A project so dead that Xi is being praised for attempting to revive it. It's going great.
when you know history
deleted by creator
lmao What ultraleft grift are you talking about?
Maopilled
deleted by creator
Yeah ik