Those job numbers only add up to like 160k and they are presumably the industries with the greatest needs because this would make the biggest impression in a headline / byline.
What the fuck is a job vacancy anyway? I'll just create a fictitious company that needs to fill 100,000 positions but never hires anyone so the news can write a sympathetic story about it whenver labor needs to be suppressed. suck off me
We should be skeptical of claims made by boujie media, but in this case I'm really not seeing what advantage all this whining is giving to capitalists. You'd think the growing perception of a lack of workers would help people negotiate higher salaries. And when it does not, we get to propagandise that :porky-happy: would rather close the company and work his few remaining employees to death than pay a living wage. All things which are true regardless of there actually being a worker shortage.
I’m really not seeing what advantage all this whining is giving to capitalists
I think it's a knee-jerk "a bad thing is happening to us, the most important people, so obviously people care." Or maybe it's supposed to suggest that we should cut social programs so people get back to work. I don't think it's some cunning propaganda plan.
The biggest thing a labor shortage means is more leverage for strikes, so if they knew what was good for them, they'd cover it up. But capitalism isn't some giant conspiracy of competent people making competent plans to oppress us, it's just a weird system of power distribution that favors whichever organizations make the line go up.
Don't know about across the pond, but here in the US, it is 100% the lazy unemployed people's fault because no one wants to work. There is pretty much no talk of raising wages to attract workers except in an abstract "wouldn't it be nice" way among those of us dying from understaffed bullshit workplaces.
"Government stop those icky browns from asking to not get killed! If they don't get killed that goes my interest because they'll want to oppress me as revenge!"
"We need a new COINTELPRO to slander feminism, if the gender pay gap is closed that will go against my interest because that MUST mean I'll make less!"
"What do you mean that porky would rather have us all work for free if he could get away with it? Why are you so CYNICAL!? Tsk tsk, mistrust everywhere..."
In the case of the UK they're manufacturing consent to re-allow worker migration.
They need to do this because the reason the northern British working class voted for this was immigration, specifically economic immigration. They wanted Brexit because they CORRECTLY recognise that economic migration is suppressing wages. Entire factories were filled with Polish workers off the boat from EU. I have seen them.
Now, we can argue about how that's exploitation of the worker blah blah blah. The British worker sees it however and sees the solution as "let's stop the migration then, then the bosses will be forced to get the workers here at the rates the British workers want".
That's not how it works though and of course they won't raise rates. Some of the factories probably can't even justify it.
The British worker needs to learn this lesson but it's incredibly hard to teach it to them, they don't want to hear that the answer is to fight the bosses, they want the answer to be halting the migration. When the tories betray them and allow the migration the result is going to be that many go even further right. And a segment of the bourgeoisie are completely ok with that, they want fascism. The left is dangerous right now and they're terrified of the young waves and ongoing radicalisation that is happening. They feel a need for a fascist cleanse.
I think what I was trying to say was that economic markers such as job vacancies are still within the realm of :porky-happy: thought.
I might have gone too far with my skepticism. I’d say we should be disdainful of claims made by boujie media — they misrepresent things all the time — and I enjoy ridiculing them.
It works like that, except you're extended a line of credit with the news paper because your children played lacrosse together or something dumb. So you need to improve a 100k worker factory flush with open air work places to research possible markets and run up credit cards to afford rent on the factory. The whole thing crumbles down when you get sued by the credit card company
Those job numbers only add up to like 160k and they are presumably the industries with the greatest needs because this would make the biggest impression in a headline / byline.
What the fuck is a job vacancy anyway? I'll just create a fictitious company that needs to fill 100,000 positions but never hires anyone so the news can write a sympathetic story about it whenver labor needs to be suppressed. suck off me
We should be skeptical of claims made by boujie media, but in this case I'm really not seeing what advantage all this whining is giving to capitalists. You'd think the growing perception of a lack of workers would help people negotiate higher salaries. And when it does not, we get to propagandise that :porky-happy: would rather close the company and work his few remaining employees to death than pay a living wage. All things which are true regardless of there actually being a worker shortage.
I think it's a knee-jerk "a bad thing is happening to us, the most important people, so obviously people care." Or maybe it's supposed to suggest that we should cut social programs so people get back to work. I don't think it's some cunning propaganda plan.
The biggest thing a labor shortage means is more leverage for strikes, so if they knew what was good for them, they'd cover it up. But capitalism isn't some giant conspiracy of competent people making competent plans to oppress us, it's just a weird system of power distribution that favors whichever organizations make the line go up.
Don't know about across the pond, but here in the US, it is 100% the lazy unemployed people's fault because no one wants to work. There is pretty much no talk of raising wages to attract workers except in an abstract "wouldn't it be nice" way among those of us dying from understaffed bullshit workplaces.
Not like regular people know it's the best time to use that leverage. That is covered up.
Reactionaries:
"Government stop those icky browns from asking to not get killed! If they don't get killed that goes my interest because they'll want to oppress me as revenge!"
"We need a new COINTELPRO to slander feminism, if the gender pay gap is closed that will go against my interest because that MUST mean I'll make less!"
"What do you mean that porky would rather have us all work for free if he could get away with it? Why are you so CYNICAL!? Tsk tsk, mistrust everywhere..."
In the case of the UK they're manufacturing consent to re-allow worker migration.
They need to do this because the reason the northern British working class voted for this was immigration, specifically economic immigration. They wanted Brexit because they CORRECTLY recognise that economic migration is suppressing wages. Entire factories were filled with Polish workers off the boat from EU. I have seen them.
Now, we can argue about how that's exploitation of the worker blah blah blah. The British worker sees it however and sees the solution as "let's stop the migration then, then the bosses will be forced to get the workers here at the rates the British workers want".
That's not how it works though and of course they won't raise rates. Some of the factories probably can't even justify it.
The British worker needs to learn this lesson but it's incredibly hard to teach it to them, they don't want to hear that the answer is to fight the bosses, they want the answer to be halting the migration. When the tories betray them and allow the migration the result is going to be that many go even further right. And a segment of the bourgeoisie are completely ok with that, they want fascism. The left is dangerous right now and they're terrified of the young waves and ongoing radicalisation that is happening. They feel a need for a fascist cleanse.
A few possible advantages for porky:
I think what I was trying to say was that economic markers such as job vacancies are still within the realm of :porky-happy: thought.
I might have gone too far with my skepticism. I’d say we should be disdainful of claims made by boujie media — they misrepresent things all the time — and I enjoy ridiculing them.
It works like that, except you're extended a line of credit with the news paper because your children played lacrosse together or something dumb. So you need to improve a 100k worker factory flush with open air work places to research possible markets and run up credit cards to afford rent on the factory. The whole thing crumbles down when you get sued by the credit card company