Imagine being so Stockholm Syndromed by the police state that you blame another country over the cops who actually did it

  • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    We need to seriously discuss mass re-education. Giving a person with this level of brain rot any political power -- even a single vote -- is a failure of liberal democracy.

    • TransTomboy [she/her, they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Is it really re education if they clearly haven't had much of an education to begin with?

      I'm sorry, that's mean, there are uneducated people who are decent human beings that didn't have an education and don't deserve that comparison.

      • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        There are at least three groups here:

        1. The politically uneducated: they just haven't received the type of education that allows them to call out bullshit propaganda as bullshit propaganda. Note that this can apply to someone who hasn't finished high school as much as it can apply to someone with a grad degree.
        2. The people who just don't give a fuck about human life: unless it's a friend or family member, they'll gladly trade human suffering for money. They'll butcher countless faceless foreigners to maintain their current standard of living.
        3. The Ben Carsons: I don't know what the fuck else to call someone who is a literal brain surgeon but thinks the pyramids were built to store grain.

        Group 1 is the easiest to work with, and (hopefully) the most common.

        • grilledSoldier [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          I think 1., as in people to politically uneducated to understand populist scapegoats, overlaps a lot with 2. in form of people that dont want to understand what the real reasons for the problems are, because its just easier for them to follow this bullshit.

          And 3. imo is really widespread in form of the following of celebrities, that may be good at something, but dont know shit about anything else, but still get seen as a kind of messias

    • CatherineTheSoSo [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Eh, I don't think that an average reactionary crank is nessesary something you'd have to worry about.

      • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        The average reactionary crank enabled Republicans to obstruct any real climate change action for the past 30 years. Imagine where we'd be on probably the most important issue in the world if H.W. Bush and the ~1990-vintage GOP didn't turn carbon emissions into a partisan issue. And don't get me wrong, Democrats are weak on climate change, too -- but part of the reason they can be weak and still get elected is because Republicans are so much fucking worse.

        More immediately, the average reactionary crank is either cheering on or tacitly approving of the police state going full fascist.

        We rip on libs plenty, and every bit of it is deserved, but don't forget how harmful right-wingers are.

        • CatherineTheSoSo [any]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Ah, I meant like post-revolution, which is when I assumed you get the power to force those people into reeducation. My point is that you don't nessesary need to put those kinds of people into camps or whatever. You just don't give them any power, tell them to shut up about their reactionary bullshit and wast majority of them would be too cowardly to cause any trouble.

          Yeah, I know, I'm probably being idealistic and native...