https://nitter.net/COLRICHARDKEMP/status/1745373430705172792
You must log in or register to comment.
Ah yes, ol' antisemitic Croblin, remember when he was behaving antisemetic by.. uh.. uhm. An official inquiry clearing him of any antisemitic behaviour?
Cool to see he's not been deterred from helping Palestinians still.
Didn’t his party become actually antisemitic after they purged him and his (perceived) sympathizers? Lol
He's antisemitic because we asked if he was antisemitic and he said "no" which is exactly what a crypto-antisemite would say. I am the first student to graduate Oxford after getting kicked in the head by a horse.
One time he was super antisemitic by attending a Hannukah party with The Wrong TypeTM of Jews.
As of right now, Corbyn's one of the few white folk I won't just straight up call a cracker; which is very high praise for a white man coming from me. Kemp, on the other hand...
Show
Show
Show
Fuck. I thought we were working to accumulate a comprehensive list of slurs against white people?
I saw a comment a few minutes ago mentioning Cum Skins, Bleach Demons, and Snow Roaches, and I think these are exciting additions to the catalog!
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Removed Comment
cracker means poor white folk... besides, i thought racial slurs weren't allowed round here...by xor [none/use name]reason: No, it doesn’t, and no, it’s not a slur
You can check the public modlog to see things like this. There is a link at the bottom of every page and most (?) sidebars.
- Show
Modlog explains. Also since you said you're "not a cracker", (this user is banned now lol) Idk what to say. Not the first time we've had someone swing in, get really mad about the usage of "cracker" and then state that they aren't one. Interesting pattern developing...
I think we should unban them, why deprive ourselves of such a ripe source of comedy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Kemp
Just a taste of this goul as if he warrents any credibility.
Kemp has repeatedly spoken out against the investigation and prosecution of British soldiers for suspected criminal acts in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the opening of new investigations relating to the actions of British soldiers in Northern Ireland during the Troubles, including those relating to Bloody Sunday.[15][16] Kemp told the Belfast News Letter that he was concerned about the investigations into historic crimes, stating "It is obvious some soldiers do some wrong things of course but there is a very clear difference between them and terrorists. Soldiers set out to uphold the law whereas terrorists set out to maim and murder. They should be treated differently."[17] Kemp was questioned by police in 2000 concerning his suspected role in the murder of a prominent Republican figure during the 1980s, but charges were not brought against him
whereas terrorists set out to maim and murder.
They should be treated differently.
Isn’t that the whole point of an investigation? To differentiate the “good apples” from the bad?
No, see, when MI-5 and British Army Intelligence pay, arm, and give orders to neo-Nazis to commit massacres to de-legitimize the Irish struggle by obscuring the political struggle under a mountain of BBC headlines that say "sectarian massacre, will religious conflict ever end?" They're upholding law and order!
why do these no names have wikipedia articles. who is platforming them to get that "famous"
Damn, it must be so easy to be one of these ghouls, all you have to do is change "terrorists" to "Hamas" and you're set.
Why are we listening to a bunch of open neo-nazis about what is and isn't antisemitism again?
Westerners are such snakes.
It's funny they're still so obsessed about Corbyn all these years later
