"I propose Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, but reversed this time so it’s Harris-Biden.

Then in 2028 we go back to Biden-Harris, Harris-Buttigieg in 2032, Buttigieg-Abrams in 36, Abrams-Butti in 40, Butti-Abrams again 44, then Abrams-TBD in 48. After that, I don’t know"

  • Decoysharktopus [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Idk Biden would be 86 in 2028, watching them try to Weekend at Bernie's his corpse would be the funniest possible outcome

    • Wildgrapes [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Wait he's only like 80 now damn I could of sworn he was 86+ already

      • CTHlurker [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Biden is actually pretty "young" for a guy who looks 900, and is failling apart on live-tv every time he opens his mouth. I posted somewhere else in the thread, that John Kerry is 78 currently, and looks like significantly better than Joe, despite only being a few years younger.

    • CTHlurker [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Aren't they currently doing? Doesn't seem like a big change to me.

  • Rojo27 [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    No scenario with Hillary being president :disgost:

    • D61 [any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      WELL, this gives her plenty of opportunities to write more books.

    • PlantsRstillCool [des/pair]
      ·
      3 years ago

      I've seen people saying they think she should run in 2024. Which is hilarious because Trump will almost certainly be the nominee and Hillary is the ONE person who's lost an election to him

  • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
    ·
    3 years ago

    buttigieg has done nothing. zero. zilch. he does not have a single achievement that would merit a further national political career. the only reason these piglets want it to be His Turn is because the party decided his biography made him "electable," and then he ate shit with a spoon in an actual election, and then he was appointed to be the scapegoat for a captured federal institution.

    HE WAS THE MAYOR OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA FOR FUCK'S SAKE.

    • RobotnikFeminism [they/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Abrams, too, is a weird person for libs to obsess over. She did a good job in registering new voters, but her highest position is state legislator; she's marginally more qualified than Lee Carter. The Dems are so desperate to avoid running progressives that their favorite candidates are small town mayors and state legislators, both of whom are best known for losing elections.

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
      ·
      3 years ago

      However I do like that they don't envision a single democrat being capable of winning two presidential terms in a row. Party of losers.

    • KasDapital [any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      I looked at population, and it's basically the same as the mayor of fucking Allen, Texas or Menifee, CA running.

      And if you don't know one of those places, that's the fucking point. He does not have any reasonable experience argument for running.

      I also expect that South Bend is a lot more gentrified than those other cites so he's not exactly representing a diverse coalition.

  • RobotnikFeminism [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    John Kerry will be in the cabinet of every administration. He'll hold a new cabinet post each time. The Democratic Party is just a front to keep John Kerry in the executive branch.

  • FirstToServe [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Anyone else remember that trumpist nonsense where they planned out every election in the future with someone from his family? Someone should reply with a link to that if they can remember where to find it.

    • Vncredleader [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      I do think chapo was right about 2024 being Ivanka vs Don Jr., maybe 2030 at the latest

  • spectre [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Liberals love means testing, paperwork, and "tactics" that circle and Dodge around arbitrary rules like fucking term limits rather than critically evaluating the rule directly