https://web.archive.org/web/20240204211109/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/feb/04/russia-china-iran-could-target-uk-irish-backdoor-thinktank-warns

certified Guardian moment.

I did some further detective work too, that isn't particularly shocking - it's just how journalism works, but if you've never given it thought before, this might interest you:

click here for detective work

The 'publication' they source, until about an hour ago, didn't lead anywhere. They report it's contents, but don't link to where it can be accessed. My first thought was that it was some very shoddy journalism. I went searching and found nothing initially. I tried again later and found it:

https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/closing-the-back-door/

I then inspected the webpage's source code: "datePublished":"2024-02-05T00:01:01+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-04T23:41:48+00:00",

It was modified on the 4th at 23:41, and It was published on '05' - today, at '00:01:01'.

The Guardian reported on it 9 hours ago. The Irish Times reported on it 8 hours ago.

Therefore, I can say without a doubt that The Guardian and The Irish Times colluded with the Policy Exchange think tank in advance, and these articles were probably lined up in advance of today. Perhaps those publications uploaded in advance in order to catch the Sinn Fein leader news cycle while it was hot, because they hadn't anticipated new leadership happening in that moment (the day before).

The Mirror also published an article on it at the time the Policy Exchange website went up about an hour ago, but I can't be arsed to check whether they're just regurgitating second hand info from the Guardian and Irish Times, or whether they're reproducing first hand info from the original publication.

Also, the think tanks leaders are ex secretaries of defence. The department of defense (offense, realistically) always has ties to top media publications.

  • buh [any]
    ·
    5 months ago

    "Irish backdoor" sounds like a euphemism an Anglo-American sex pest from the 1850s would use

  • ForkBombRaja [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Could this article have something to do with the new nationalist First Minister of Northern Ireland and the resulting insecurity from London?

      • IzyaKatzmann [he/him]
        ·
        5 months ago

        you think they have these kinds of stories at the ready or publications just scramble and say whatever? i'm confused because it seems like the same quality as their other content.

        • MaoTheLawn [any, any]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It's hard to say what exactly goes on each time, but in general there's a baseline capitalist ideology, and within that, the ideology is reactive to the worlds stimuli. They can't predict everything that's going to happen, but for the most part the world works the way it works. Events don't just happen, they are precluded by trends and other events which are all closely monitored. For example, no one predicted the day or method that Hamas would attack Israel, but everyone knew that an eventuality like that was bound to happen, and the media was ready to pounce on the specifics, and interpret them with the usual ideology.

          In this case, Ireland has been heading down the path of independence for a long time, and Sinn Fein taking power in Northern Ireland was not unimaginable. It was then announced, and now the media will react with their usual takes. The usual takes are ready at hand, because the ideology is the same every time. The think tank paper they cite is pretty long, and probably wouldn't just appear overnight - if it did, then all the research (the ideology) was already to hand, and they mad dashed it out. But I don't think that's the case.

          In this case, if you'll trust my internet detective work, I deduce that this article was already in the works, and just happened to coincide with specific events (Sinn Fein taking leadership in Northern Ireland). They might have even published it earlier than they should've in order to catch that days Sinn Fein news cycle.

          The 'publication' they source, until about an hour ago, didn't lead anywhere. They report it's contents, but don't link to where it can be accessed. My first thought was that it was some very shoddy journalism. I went searching and found nothing initially. I tried again later and found it:

          https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/closing-the-back-door/

          I then inspected the webpage's source code: "datePublished":"2024-02-05T00:01:01+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-04T23:41:48+00:00",

          It was modified on the 4th at 23:41, and It was published on '05' - today, at '00:01:01'.

          The Guardian reported on it 9 hours ago. The Irish Times reported on it 8 hours ago.

          Therefore, I can say without a doubt that The Guardian and The Irish Times colluded with the Policy Exchange think tank in advance, and these articles were probably lined up in advance of today. Perhaps those publications uploaded in advance in order to catch the Sinn Fein leader news cycle while it was hot, because they hadn't anticipated new leadership happening in that moment (the day before).

          The Mirror also published an article on it at the time the Policy Exchange website went up about an hour ago, but I can't be arsed to check whether they're just regurgitating second hand info from the Guardian and Irish Times, or whether they're reproducing first hand info from the original publication.

          Also, the think tanks leaders are ex secretaries of defence. The department of defense (offense, realistically) always has ties to top media publications. They 'leak' information, or report it first hand for the media to publish. These links are well documented.

  • Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida [he/him]
    ·
    5 months ago

    They pay these people at least six figures to come up with something I could have written after playing a session of HOI4! How wasteful.

    • MaoTheLawn [any, any]
      hexagon
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think the usual Guardian salary is between 28-70k (large range I know), but he probably gets underhand benefits from his connections to power, monetarily or otherwise.

  • Xx_Aru_xX [she/her]
    ·
    5 months ago

    The Afghanistan- Albania- People's Democratic Republic of Algeria- Andorra- Angola- Antigua and Barbuda- Argentina- Armenia- The Bahamas- Bahrain- Bangladesh- Barbados- Belarus- Belgium- Belize- Benin- Bhutan- Bolivia- Bosnia and Herzegovina- Botswana- Brazil- Brunei- Bulgaria- Burkina Faso- Burundi- Cabo Verde- Cambodia- Cameroon- Central African Republic- Chad- Chile- China- Colombia- Comoros- Congo, Democratic Republic of the- Congo, Republic of the- Costa Rica- Côte d’Ivoire- Croatia- Cuba- Cyprus- Djibouti- Dominica- Dominican Republic- East Timor (Timor-Leste)- Ecuador- Egypt- El Salvador- Equatorial Guinea- Eritrea- Estonia- Eswatini- Ethiopia- Fiji- Gabon- The Gambia- Georgia- Ghana- Greece- Grenada- Guatemala- Guinea- Guinea-Bissau- Guyana- Haiti- Honduras- Hungary- India- Indonesia- Iran- Iraq- Ireland- Jamaica- Jordan- Kazakhstan- Kenya- Kiribati- Democratic People's Republic of Korea- Kuwait- Kyrgyzstan- Laos- Latvia- Lebanon- Lesotho- Liberia- Libya- Madagascar- Malawi- Malaysia- Maldives- Mali- Malta- Marshall Islands- Mauritania- Mauritius- Mexico- Micronesia, Federated States of- Moldova- Monaco- Mongolia- Montenegro- Morocco- Mozambique- Myanmar- Namibia- Nauru- Nepal- Netherlands- New Zealand- Nicaragua- Niger- Nigeria- North Macedonia- Oman- Pakistan- Palau- Panama- Papua New Guinea- Paraguay- Peru- Philippines- Qatar- Romania- Russia- Rwanda- Saint Kitts and Nevis- Saint Lucia- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines- Samoa- San Marino- Sao Tome and Principe- Saudi Arabia- Senegal- Serbia- Seychelles- Sierra Leone- Singapore- Slovakia- Slovenia- Solomon Islands- Somalia- South Africa- Spain- Sri Lanka- Sudan- Sudan, South- Suriname- Syria- Tajikistan- Tanzania- Thailand- Togo- Tonga- Trinidad and Tobago- Tunisia- Turkey- Turkmenistan- Tuvalu- Uganda- Uruguay- Uzbekistan- Vanuatu- Vatican City- Venezuela- Vietnam- Yemen- Zambia- Zimbabwian axis of evil

  • VILenin [he/him]
    ·
    5 months ago

    I didn't have "the Irish have their white status revoked" on my 2024 bingo card

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    5 months ago

    Time to bump up the timeline on the Irish strategic nuclear weapons program.

    • Mindfury [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      Group of chinese-armed IRA soldiers walk into a Greggs

      Remember - no sausage rolls

      4 IRA soldiers absolutely let rip full auto on the gammon standing in line in front of them

    • VILenin [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      (picture a raging boomer thumb screaming at a 16 year old boy) LEWIS, DEFEND CRUMDINGLYHAMSHIRE BY-THE-SEA!

    • MaoTheLawn [any, any]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      there's Thatcher's Techbase, a Doom mod where you kill Margaret Thatcher, which Jeremy Corbyn was photographed playing: https://youtu.be/9dO5j9dHHO4?si=_m8PT_0O4i567Rgz

      then there's Duke Smoochem - a leftist Duke Nukem mod that's a satire of Britain: https://youtu.be/4EGY-NfW4n4?si=AirQIFxlx_8kniTx

      Then there's Corbyn playing Techbase in Duke Smoochem: https://youtu.be/fl0E82Z72FE?si=464I8H8LPX23ysqs

      There's also a Fallout London mod coming out soon that looks pretty amazing. But yeah, our defend burgertown would probably be Captain Price in a Greggs or a Wetherspoons.

      When COD actually did Britain they made the map Underground in MW3 (taking place in the London Underground).

      • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]
        ·
        5 months ago

        rawi oh, oil geh on dat as sewn as yumanly possibel, buh fayest I goh uh enjawi me tiddly winks and smuggly mugglies befoh tha rashuns dun stop incloodin dem

  • TimeTravel_0
    ·
    5 months ago

    the guardian? more like the goblin.

  • Snackuleata [any]
    ·
    5 months ago

    And it wouldn't be surprisin' if there be another risin'

    Said the man from the Daily Mail Guardian

  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is pretty much the NATO go-to for any election or politician they don't like. Tried the same shit in Colombia by accusing Petro of having Russian influence.