• Utter_Karate [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ok, who's next in line and how many of these fuckers have to go before we end up with a severely disabled child emperor ruling through an all-powerful caste of eunuch beurocrats?

    • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, if William dies, and Harry abdicated or whatever, maybe Prince "Randy" Andy (Andrew) could end up there since William's children are very young.

      Having Prince King Diddler on the British throne and after that they abolish it would be the most fitting end possible for that shithole island

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        William already has 2 boys who would be next in line after him. Harry wouldn't be involved at all unless all 3 children died.

        Charles > William > George > Charlotte > Harry

        • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes but I did specifically say his kids are all young. it's not unheard of to have a child-monarch have an older family member who is further down the ascension line rule in their place until they come of age. also I thought Harry already did his whatever shit saying he would never have an interest in the throne. also also... I just wanted to call out Andrew because... Jesus Christ. What a Brit. That's all I can say. A beautiful specimen representative of his island (yes I know the royals are German-Greek or whatever, stop ruining this for me)

          • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yes but I did specifically say his kids are all young. it's not unheard of to have a child-monarch have an older family member who is further down the ascension line rule in their place until they come of age.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regent

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Oh fuck my wish came true. I'm sorry everyone I wasted my birthday wish on just one of them :(

  • MelaniaTrump [undecided]
    ·
    10 months ago

    In the tumultuous theocratic monarchy of the United Kingdom, an island nation marked by instability and recent shifts in leadership, Buckingham Palace has disclosed that King Charles III is battling cancer. This development adds to the nation's ongoing leadership crisis, intensified by the recent passing of Queen Elizabeth II. The type of cancer remains undisclosed, casting a veil of secrecy over the king's health and highlighting concerns about transparency. At 75, Charles's withdrawal from public duties to undergo treatment underscores the fragile state of the regime. Amidst regular treatments and vows to return to duty, this episode exposes the deepening cracks within a monarchy struggling to uphold its ancient aristocratic traditions against the backdrop of its decline from a global powerhouse to a state grappling with internal strife and a succession of ephemeral leaders.

    ukkk

    • booty [he/him]
      ·
      10 months ago

      no point abdicating if you arent gonna abolish the entire monarchy.

      come on, dont you wanna be in the history books as the last british monarch and not just some guy trying to fill lizzie's shoes? it'd be pretty funny

    • VILenin [he/him]
      ·
      10 months ago

      The price is wrong, bitch.

      :barker-golf-club:

  • PKMKII [none/use name]
    ·
    10 months ago

    If this is an aggressive form of cancer, he could end up with the third shortest reign of any English monarch. One for the record books!

  • CommunistBear [he/him]
    ·
    10 months ago

    Further proof that Comrade Truss hit him with the cancer gun. Keep Truss'ing the plan! inshallah