Wikipedia is definitely credible trust me bro they’re listening to unbiased UKRAINIAN propaganda instead of conniving Russian propaganda

  • happybadger [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I'm so curious about that Il-76. The carrying capacity I've seen quoted on those is like 120 paratroopers.

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
      ·
      3 years ago

      Here's the thing about massive planes like that: they leave a shitton of wreckage that's burning and easily captured on photo or video.

      Yet for being such a large and easily identifiable plane, there hasn't been any photos confirming the destruction of said plane

      • happybadger [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        https://twitter.com/search?q=il-76&src=typed_query

        You seem to be right so far. There's one photo of a crashed Il-76 but it's from 2014. Another video of a crashed aircraft is featured but it's an AN-26 from Ukraine. The US was willing to go on the record saying two Il-76s were shot down but that's about as close as I've found to confirmation.

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          did the state dept mention where those IL-76s went down? maybe somewhere near iraq's WMD storage facilities? :bean-think:

          • happybadger [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            See that's the thing. If it were a vague report I'd discount it entirely but they seemed to have a pretty precise understanding of where they went down: Bila Tserkva, 50mi south of Kyiv / Vasylkiv, 25mi south of Kyiv

            https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FMfu4JEXsAIfYUx?format=jpg&name=900x900

            Searching those locations doesn't give any photos either, but Vasylkiv does seem to have an active air war over it: https://twitter.com/i/status/1497523635703238656

            • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              I wonder if they really did get them then, but it sure seems like there would be at least some photos of massive wreckage from at least one of them

              • happybadger [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                The liveuamap.com map doesn't seem to indicate whether that area is held by Russia or not. There's an airbase nearby so it would be a priority target at least. I did find video of an Su-25 (https://twitter.com/i/status/1497659200666845186) and Mi-24 (https://twitter.com/i/status/1497650174935642116) getting bonked north of Crimea though. Wouldn't want to be in those fuckers.

          • happybadger [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Just observers I think. There was a flight radar tracking one of the Global Hawk drones watching Russia's fleet in the Black Sea. Presumably they've got the same setup over Ukraine, if not by drone then at least geostationary satellites.

            • Awoo [she/her]
              ·
              3 years ago

              They were up simultaneously over the Black Sea, Romania and Poland. The RAF also had a C135 up over Hungary but I don't know where that is now.

        • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Also on record saying Sadam had WMDs so their word is worth less than the air they waste uttering it

      • Staines [they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        It would be the easiest thing in the world for a couple of Ukrainians to take pictures of a massive crashed Il-76. It would be a big propaganda victory. Yet there are no pictures after a full day?

        • jackmarxist [any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          They crashed into putins bunker in the kremlim and got sensored by 1984 Russia

      • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I wonder they're using "shot down" instead of a less-impressive "forced to land" in this instance?

          • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            I think being forced to make a controlled landing is a bit different than crashing in a blazing fireball.

            • furryanarchy [comrade/them,they/them]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Not in practical operational terms. Planes take a long time to repair, if repairs are even possible. Damaging an aircraft and forcing a landing takes it out of action for so long it's just as good as turning it into a flaming fireball. It achieves the same result.