Cross compass unity confirmed???!!


Link to thread: https://twitter.com/InfraHaz/status/1533910149420797959

An ‘anarchist’ should be treated the same as Azov. The fact that MLs in the west do not comprehend this, and think anarchists are ‘fellow leftists’ is one of the main things holding them back.

Anarchism is genocidal nihilism and bases itself on nothingness and individuality. Marxism-Leninism is, in Lenin’s words, based on ‘the treasures of mankind’ and bases itself in civilizations, cultures, and histories of peoples.

‘Anarchists’ reveal their genocidal mentality by dismissing all civilizations as ‘oppressive’ to the individual, revealing their individualistic colonial view of what constitutes a people. They think a people is just the sum total of special snowflakes.

Meanwhile, almost all humanity believes a people is a deeper reality than the individual. The ‘anarchist’ thinks all humanity is wrong and illegitimate, and their latest trend is to co opt ‘indigenous’ tribes as realizing their model, despite this being wrong.

In a racist way they say indigenous people don’t have ‘civilization.’ That’s wrong, almost all ‘indigenous tribes’ do possess civilization and ‘oppression’ of some kind. The anarchoid is a creature of d*generate liberalism and has nothing in common with any substantive humanity.

The anarchoid claims it’s absurd to accuse them of being state assets, since they represent ‘negation of state.’ But every negation is tied to the determinate principle it ‘negates.’ Independence from this principle is only achieved in ‘negation of negation,’ a new one.

In this way, anarchists who seek to ‘abolish everything’ are tied to the status quo. Pure negation does not arrive at anything determinate except the object of negation. By default, anarchism is just a criminal excess of the bourgeois state itself. Part of status quo.

  • LeninsBeard [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well some leftists did join, or at least support, the nazis in the early days. This included anarcho syndicalists and socialist politicians discredited by their support for WW1. They were suckered in by false class consciousness and failed to recognize that the extreme nationalism of the nazis was a huge issue. We should learn from that and

    Patsoc

    Oh.

  • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I hope some people are getting paid to direct ML/anarchist's energy against other people with no institutional power.

    Like even if you think they are dumb and disagree with their vision for society, their methods under capitalism are at worst irrelevant and often perfectly compatible, so attacking them at best is a waste of energy and at worst detrimental to your own ends.

    • doesntmatter [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I very much hope this guy isn't what popularly passes for a principled Marxist-Leninist. It would make a lot of sense for how often I hear complaints about MLs if so, but I really really hope not.

      • Mardoniush [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I'm not saying there aren't ML edgelords in RL, but they're mostly the newspaper stand set not the people getting anything done.

        In actual work no one has time to debate kronstadt for the Graham's Numberth time.

      • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I very much hope this guy isn’t what popularly passes for a principled Marxist-Leninist

        That's why I'm hoping the state is paying him and elevating his takes. The possibility that a large portion of the 17000 accounts that follow a guy who almost exclusively seems to post drama bait with other irrelevant twitter users and attack LGBT+/minority religions/anarchists/furries are actual people is too pessimistic.

        Actually I think he might be a liberal? I didn't see a single post critical of capitalism, just attacking people critical of capitalism.

          • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            He definitely has fascist vibes, but in OP (among the incomprehensible word salad), he criticizes a fascist state for its subservience to the capitalist class.

            Maybe he has a wacky understanding of fascism that can be divorced from capitalism or is being disingenuous for his audience but that seems like a general attack on fascism.

            I'm not going to look this guy up, but I suspect he's one of the libs whose completely non-systemic criticism of capitalism amounts to

            a. capitalists and politicians are making immoral choices that benefit them instead of helping the people they have power over.

            b. marginalized groups enable this.

            So yes a fascist.

            • AcidSmiley [she/her]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Maybe he has a wacky understanding of fascism

              well he has a wacky understanding of about anything.

      • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        He's not lol just an apartment dwelling national socialist who uses big words to say very little and reeees every time Uber eats calls him to pick up his tendies since he has to walk to the door (not making this shit up)

  • HornyOnMain
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Going through several pages of his twitter because I was bored, I found literally only one case of him promoting any anticapitalist action (joining a union) which he only mentioned in passing to slag off anarchists. The rest was just him punching left against ancoms, gay communists, Maoists, the fucking CPI (though that's not really leftist), antifa activists, that one furry in the starbucks union, Hakim specifically for some reason, the entirety of Vietnam, the concept of public transportation, homeless people, trans communists, people who dislike the US, etcetera, etcetera.

    Also he has a weird hard on for libertarians and thinks that they're somehow more anti imperialist than ancoms.

    there's no way this guy isn't a :fedposting:

  • DoiDoi [comrade/them, he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    those people in the replies who clearly spend hours a day arguing anarchism vs communism are so fucking lost in the LARP.

    • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      lol theyre not actually arguing "anarchism vs communism" because hazcel's followers are all reactionaries and the "anarchists" are radlibs, either way half of the replies are dunking on haz and the other half are sucking his wee wee, twitter is not a place for any sort of serious argument even of a LARP kind, its all just petty drama cope for social atomization in the 1st world, like reality tv but you can interact with the stars this time

      • DoiDoi [comrade/them, he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah probably. I just found my way into some drama where "anarchists" trashed a communist table at some rally recently which seemed to spawn a shit ton of "no collab with commies" type celebration posts from people with over the top edgy anarchist profiles. I don't know who this haz guy is and I've never done twitter but yeah I'm certain this is all dumb as hell

        • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          “anarchists” trashed a communist table

          Yeah those were my comrades that got attacked by those "post-left" shitstains at the bay area anarchist book fair. They paid to participate at the fair and agreed to rules the fair organizers put out to be both non-sectarian and participate in peaceful open dialogue between ideologies, and actually had an enjoyable time there until towards the end of the day when those creeps attacked.

          • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            The shitstains were anti-civ losers. Daily reminder that primitivism and its offshoots like anti-civ are inherently transphobic and ableist and thus reactionary. Go ask your average primitivist how their society would handle diabetic transwomen and watch the transphobia and ableism come pouring out. No big surprise then that people who subscribe to that reactionary ideology would do reactionary things and act like reactionaries even if their aesthetics might be radical.

        • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          corporate algorithm-mediated public spaces and their consequences etc. etc.

  • PunishedBernie [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This guy is just Ian (Va*sh) wearing a Marxist disguise 🥸

    I’ve seen both this take and “Mussolini was anarchist” before and it reeks of neckbeard-tier fedora radlib.

    • Commander_Data [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, nonsense like that is 100% counter-revolutionary. Haz should be escorted to the nearest pit pr wall, imo.

  • HornyOnMain
    ·
    2 years ago

    From his twitter:

    Proving EXACTLY Why Hitler was an Anarchist live at 9pm EST. Even professors were too scared to debate me on this. After this stream, there can be no doubt or question of the fact. Anarchism unmasked: [I'm not linking this bullshit]

    "too scared to debate me" aka "no one wants to talk to me"

    • Kuori [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      indistinguishable from the most loathsome far-right dweeb

      'cause he is one

  • Shoegazer [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    List of cringe anarchists:

    • Hitler
    • Leopold II
    • FDR
    • Elizabeth II
    • :anarxi:

    List of based communists:

    • Nicholas II
    • Reagan
    • Mao
    • Himmler
  • PunishedBernie [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    That whole thread reads like fed shit. No wonder Haz got banned when he tried to post here.

      • PunishedBernie [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah, I forget what exactly got him banned, but it was some weird contrarian radlib shit combined with stupidpol tier brainworms about trans people

        • StellarTabi [none/use name]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I swear you could legitimately make the only rule in your community "no transphobia" and 99% of the people you normally would have banned just out themselves on this alone.

        • Ideology [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I can't believe I missed an opportunity to bully him for being a creepy incel.

          • AcidSmiley [she/her]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I missed it as well, i've heard he tried to warn people that weed feminizes them. I can even imagine how that happened, Haz trying to grow his own weed and coming across "feminized" seeds, freaking the fuck out and never touching a spliff again lol

          • PunishedBernie [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            It was like a year ago, before he’d blown up in popularity and he got dogpiled pretty heavily lol

        • viva_la_juche [they/them, any]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          He’s been banned a couple times, once was for saying weed made men more feminine or something to that effect lol

          • Ideology [she/her]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            This big/tall viking-looking guy I used to know smoked from the time he woke up til the time he went to bed, lol. 24/7 high. He looked like an alt-right ubermensch but way more chill.

  • TheLegendaryCarrot23 [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    My brain melts everytime I see this guy's word salad bullshit. Hes a fascist who seeks to grift and confuse and taint the discourse of radical left politics. Don't get me wrong I don't think he's supported by the US regime directly he isn't important enough (not impossible though) , hes a true believer and is doing this on his own most likely. He's in the same league as those Larouche cult clowns at the CPI with Caleb Maupin. I'm not doing a red brown thing, but fascist will use left rhetoric . Read about Lyndon Lourache's fascist movement which became quite powerful in the 80's and started out masking as "leftist" getting in street brawls with communist in the 70's who they called "synthetic leftist" ( not real leftist like them mhm).

    • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Last year I saw a debate between him and some "third positionist" (online politics needs to die) and it was basically 1 hour of hazcel unironically calling his opponent a parasite for living on welfare.... from his apartment with food, electricity, water, internet, etc. provided by daddy's wallet at the time lmfao

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Read about Lyndon Lourache’s fascist movement which became quite powerful in the 80’s and started out masking as “leftist” getting in street brawls with communist in the 70’s who they called “synthetic leftist” ( not real leftist like them mhm).

      Funny you mention that, some of the older members of my party actually talked about how they got into street brawls with the larushites back in the day when those shitheads would try and party crash their events

  • OgdenTO [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ah yes, the Nazis, famous for abolishing the state and never depending on state-run, organized, industrialized activities for their existence