Shower your upvotes and awards on this glorious revolution

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/vm0217/petition_to_impeach_clarence_thomas_passes_300000/

  • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I don't know why I bothered to read the comments. It's the same shit the libs have been saying for more than a year. Crap like this "It's mathematically impossible with this Congress."

    Even at this late date Biden could tell agencies in the federal government to compile dossiers on all dem senators. The CIA, the FBI, the NSA, the IRS and a whole bunch of other three letter agencies many of which we don't know the initialisms of.

    And then he could call the worst recalcitrant dem senators - one at a time - into the Oval Office and read them the riot act and tell them he would absolutely ruin their lives and the lives of people that they love if they didn't do what he wanted. I'm sure there's no shortage of dirty, criminal shit that they are involved in. And if not - it doesn't matter. Biden could have some shit created and totally fuck them anyway.

    I don't know the number of senators. It's certainly higher than two - not just Manchin and Sinema. Five? More? Many more? Anyway - it's mutually assured destruction for the entire party if they don't comply.

    Of course Biden would never, ever do that but he could.

    • Wildgrapes [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh senator manchin nice of you to join us in the oval office. I wanted to catch up. Maybe watch a movie.

      Perspective of Kennedy's assassination from the grassy knoll plays

      Oh unrelated I wanted to ask how your daughter is doing? Well I hope. Just kidding I know she's doing well... In fact here's a few photos of her doing well taken just 10 minutes ago.

      Now I trust you'll be voting correctly this afternoon? Excellent thanks for stopping by.

  • 4zi [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Has an online petition ever gotten the US government to ever do something, in the history of online petitions

  • JohnBrownIsCool [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Pollster (fascist): "Sir, you cannot vote for the Supreme Court here."

    Me, on an iPad I smuggled into the voting booth with two-bars worth of 3G and direct access to change.org: 😏

  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Honestly it would be good for this to blow up. I don't think I need to explain to anybody here how absolutely useless petitions are, but aside from packing the court, impeaching the assholes who are on it already is one of the few legitimate options for reform which the Democrats will absolutely never touch, so let the libs play with their bourgeois democracy busy box and learn. The higher they run up the score, the more pathetic it will make the party look.

  • Rojo27 [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Umm, sir, this a petition. If you really want to get something done :vote:

  • thirstywizard [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    200 million sigs would get ignored, lets b real, electoralism is the bourgeois art of swindling the masses.

  • 20000bannedposters [love/loves]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If you are going to a protest and seeing quirky funny signs. Than the protest is about as serious as this petition

    • FirstToServe [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      1, probably 99% of it) He's the one who wrote the concurrence that put a target on gay people, contraceptives and a third one I forgot. Oops.

      1. He's probably the most evil and influential person of the entire right in this country

      2. Coke can

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I could see it being because of racism of course, but he also has a bit more skeletons in his closet because of his confirmation hearings and Anita Hill. The same applies to Kavanaugh though.

      • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think his rambling opinions also show he's clearly prejudiced on topics the court is yet to hear. Which, ofc all the judges are and impartiality just doesn't exist, but it seems like a thing a judge probably shouldn't put in writing.

        • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          It's like how news can't actually ever be objective, but fox News is less objective than the rest.

    • Tapirs10 [undecided,she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      He said that they should also ban gay marriage contraceptives and gay sex in his opinion. Iirc the rest didn't