• A_Serbian_Milf [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Hahahaha based if true

    Wonder how anti-imperialist trump was being when he appointed Bolton and bombed Syria and assassinated Solemaini

    • AcidSmiley [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or supported Jerusalem becoming capital of Israel, or broke the nuclear deal with Iran in spite of Iran fulfilling all the requirements.

  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Even by the standards of their completely incoherent ideology, Modi and Erdogan would be better anti-imperialists than fucking Trump lol

    • Awoo [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It's not incoherent when you understand that they're just fascists.

      The point is to pretend to coopt socialist sentiment for the purposes of advancing fascism. This does exactly that, presenting a person advancing the cause of fascism as a member of a group he absolutely is not a member of.

      It's completely coherent when you understand what their goal actually is.

  • AnarchoLiberty [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Who’s the second guy there? I recognize Trump Putin and Xi, is the second one Kim? Just looks a little off it it’s supposed to be Kim.

  • cawsby [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The current trend of "Multipolarity" is from exposure to "Dungism/Eurasianism", not socialism. Socialism promotes internationalism, not "multipolarity".

    Anyone who says it with a straight face is sus tbh.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Socialism promotes internationalism, not “multipolarity”.

      An international world is necessarily multipolar, at least in so far as there is no single globe-spanning imperial hegemon.

      That said, yes. Internationalism looks to go much farther than simply balkinizing the current western empire. Ideally, you end up with a global Congress rather than a G8 Summit For Communists.