Fun fact both chuds arent european
These dipshits thinking they're trad caths while shit talking the pope will never not be funny to me.
It's like if somebody based their entire personality on the movie fight club and went around saying "the first rule of fight club is you have to tell everybody you know about fight club"
Why try to pigeonhole yourself into an external personality if you dont agree with one of the core tenants.
There is literally only one good point in those pictures, and it is that neanderthals get a bad rap. Not that neanderthals were all muscular and long-lived (they weren't), just that they get a bad rap. Neanderthals are cool.
One theory I've heard is that they were super peaceful compared to homosapiens. Not sure when or where I read that
I was going to tell you that most Neanderthal remains are found with signs of injury which would be evidence against that, but it looks like that is just a myth. That said, it seems the frequency of injuries among Neanderthal and their contemporaneous Homo Sapiens peers was about even, which does work as evidence against the idea they were super peaceful unless they were significantly more clumsy hunters.
I have the impression that the pro-neanderthal sentiment can be a thin end of a racist wedge.
Here is a map from wikipedia captioned "Known Neanderthal range in Europe (blue), Southwest Asia (orange), Uzbekistan (green), and the Altai Mountains (violet) ":
Show
So look at that and think, "what would a racist see". Don't be to cute about it.
With neanderthals being actually pretty smart and cool, they can be seen to contribute that certain je ne sais quoi to white people that makes them actually biologically distinct from other humans. Which is of course a closed question (FAKE) generally speaking.
I'm not saying that's true and I'm not saying anyone here is saying it. I'm just saying that there could be some motivated reasoning.
That thread image is all just leftists fucking with each other isn’t it?
It's just one leftist - it's a comic by the artis BeanyTuesday. Same guy who gave us
Well then you are in for a treat https://twitter.com/beanytuesday/status/1018944312816619525?lang=da
No, you should have a large cock, actually, and a high IQ. It can be done.
It can be done, yes, but I don't think this "Eurasian Emperor" fellow would like what that looks like in practice...
Show
※IQ is racist pseudoscience and the concept of intelligence in general is deeply misleading
Large cocks are also psuedoscience as it presumes a galactic standard cock size and no such cock size has ever been empirically established.
That said, much sympathy for large cock comrades as it can be a serious hassle and cause problems of varying kinds and folks should know about that and not objectify people about it.
it can be a serious hassle and cause problems of varying kinds
This is true....I'd rather not elaborate 😬💀 #bigdickproblems
People without big dicks brag about their size. People with big dicks have a painful and embarrassing story about it that they don't like sharing.
Nevermind the fetishizing of Black people, the amount of times I've icked being referred to as a "bbc" 🙃
someone said that to you?? i shouldn't be surprised about how gross people can be, but Christ alive.
Yeah a friend of mine, I don't think she meant anything by it but I was still weirded out cause I'd never been referred to as such before. I didn't really know how to address it so I just didn't say anything. It's not as if she ever really said it to me again (originally she was talking about me to someone else....on stream...) but I was just like "huh, that's what that feels like".
The most common one is, very simply, most vaginas (or bums) aren't able to accommodate a penis much larger than average. Once you hit seven or eight inches you're going to run in to problems with hitting people in the cervix. If you're have a larger than average circumference then penetrative sex might just not be feasible. Some people can certainly enthusiastically tackle a large penis, but its certainly not everyone and can lead to people with large penises having difficult sex lives and relationships. When someone is experiencing difficulty having a fulfilling sex life with their partner, while at the same time being told their large penis is a symbol of sexual prowess and highly desirable, it can be very hurtful and upsetting. It's dehumanizing and doesn't acknowledge the difficulties people face in real life.
And there are other issues; If your penis is very prominent when erect than getting an unexpected erection can be effectively impossible to hide, putting you in a very awkward situation. A long penis might need to be held a certain way when sitting on the toilet to avoid hitting the water. You may have difficulty finding comfortable pants and underwear. The world is really not kind to people who deviate too far from the norm.
"Having a tiny dick is European culture" is the most straightforward self own I have ever read
bodyshaming? on hexbear?
it's more common than you'd think.
explain how it's a self-own without engaging in that yourself
Because the self-own isn’t in having a small penis. The self-own is in making it blatantly obvious they’ve got a hangup on their penis size (which might not even be that small; a lot of men with size anxiety are of average or even above average size), and they’ve turned that hangup into a reactionary, backwards politics. They’re telling on themselves that they think restoring a white aristocracy will make them feel better about their manhood.
Because they clearly think its a big deal or else they wouldn't make it part of their identity.
For the same reason it's funny when you get to the point of incel logic where they say that having sex with women is super gay.
Because they've clearly built a complicated narrative for why they aren't the the thing they hate even though it was only their own narrative that made that a bad thing.
Because they're trying to bodybshame people with normal sized penis' as removed.
Because they earnestly said "penis size and virtue are inversely proportional"
This is really approaching intentional ignorance levels of creduialism.
Nobody is bodyshaming stop playing into the stereotype of "progressives" who ignore all context and the multiple explanations to try to get offended about something that didn't happen.
It's endemic. Body shaming on hexbear is reddit bad, normies on facebook would find some of the stuff crass.
I would like to once again remind everyone that, to the best of my knowledge, 95% of all human penises on earth fall between 4-6in in length, while 95% of vaginas are between 4-6in in depth, and this is all very silly.
I decided to check as yous call it "natopedia" to find out what nato thinks of this
All I can conclude is that the actual page for penises is much longer than the page on vaginals. I think I discovered the two most bonkers wp pages.
Medical science announces major breakthrough; Existence of "Women", long thought to be a myth, has been experimentally confirmed in laboratory situations.
It's wild how disparate the treatment of men and women, defined broadly, is in medical science. The bias is incredible.
inventing myths about shit and then getting mad about it sums up all of chuddery
— Large penis worship is just another form of slave worship. Virtue and penis size are inversely proportional. Shaming men for having small penises is anti-European and anti-aristocratic. Enjoy your free lunch while it lasts, slaves. Your time in the sun is coming to an end.
[Easy: Success] — No, you should have a large cock, actually, and a high IQ.
[Trivial: Success] — It can be done.
beta leftists trying to explain that penis size is random and therefore not worth shaming or being shamed over*Also consensual compliments that are total lies. “Biggest one I’ve ever seen” etc.
Common men’s kink tbh.
Me, an immortal vampire slut with a medically undocumented form of "lucid" Alice in Wonderland Syndrome, dating exclusively nullos, then once the nullo supply has been fully exhausted, switching to pre-T trans men, then post-T trans men and cis men with micropenes, then men with penes within standard deviation, then finally men with penes above the standard deviation, going roughly in order of smallest to biggest but using my powers of volitional macropsia when necessary, all so that I can tell every guy I'm with that his is the "biggest one I've ever seen" without ever needing to lie because lying is bad. This project has taken roughly 131 years thus far but I have made a lot of guys very happy. It's not much but it's honest work
The Flintstones used to have this gag where various dinosaurs and broadly “prehistoric” creatures would serve as home appliances. Such as a pelican trash bin etc. they’d turn to the audience and say “it’s a living”.
Kinda like this but there were many instances in this running gag https://youtu.be/cx5hGKAMe9M?si=MwBwBBIJ5W5v0RFp
I feel like I should've figured that out, because I did watch... a little...? Flintstones as a kid.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
God turning up the penis slider to maximum, shrugging his shoulders as the virtue slider plummets
Eh,he says,It's a dump statfree lunch
Slaves
Smartest chud who definitely knows what words mean
Heterosexual chud discourse: being overly concerned with the size of your fellow man's penis.
Also, was it in Rome or ancient Greece that having a fat cock was considered vulgar, and so all the statues have lil guys, or is that a myth
Some of it is survivability bias. Monster dongs are more likely to break off of the statue.
I think it was Greece and I'm like 98% sure that the penises were all of a normal size, like the modal size for penises, and people just have no idea how big penises are any more because dick wiggling has fallen out of favor as a form of cultural celebration.
speaking of "tradition", i have great news about this thing called a "bathhouse"
Had more to do with what the statue depicted. The greeks were more interested in showing a idealised human form, genitals were considered the least interesting part, ergo the mal statues had small dicks and balls and the female ones had innies.
The focus was on the face, muscles, body shape and so on.
In other areas they had zero problems with showing big dongs. Satyr pics always go wild.
The Romans had a big dicked god responsible for guarding the home. He was always depicted with a huge erection, as he would rape any burglars.
History is just rad. People are just people through all time.
The romans also had so called trivia boards, were everyone could write shit on. Like "Looking for X, offering Y", "Want to buy Z". These boards contained the finest shitposts, Brothel ratings, coming out statements and Tons of dick jokes.
Also: Graffiti is old as fuck. Egyptian temples are full of scribbles going back milenia. My are the 3 gallic madlads who climbed a pillar to write "Agamonos to Cabalos to Torq asubio." on top, "Agamonos, Cabalos and Torq were here."
Yeah I think it was Greece. Also they were big foreskin fans and thought it was rude to have an exposed glans. They used string to tie their dicks when naked in public to stay decent (kynodesme).
I also vaguely remember something about some kind of wire tying operation that stage actors back then would get to keep them flaccid at all times, to be dramaturgically correct or something. I might be wrong though
There's alot to unpack here and it isn't a massive cock unfortunately.
