Like almost all directors, Kubrick was famously an asshole who treated his actors really badly, but I haven't heard about anything more damning than that.
This has always wierded me out, because all the directors I've worked with, even the difficult ones who I didn't like, have not been assholes and in fact been unfailingly nice even during arguments.
Is this a screen/stage divide thing or a "once you get to the AAA houses you get the obsessed wankers" thing
At the top end it's more than you might think. Phantom costs almost a million USD a week to put on Broadway, supposedly. The Vienna Opera house gets about 55 million Euro a year purely in government subsidy, before ticket sales. And it is uh, not turning a profit.
Almost every house in Europe runs a loss, it's been that way since the 1650s, subsidised by either the state or rich assholes, pays starvation wages even to the leads, somehow never makes the money back, rich assholes get tax write off...oh...look...all the production budget went to their set painting side business.
Sydney runs in the black, at the cost of exactly 1 interesting opera a year, the rest horrible stagings of Traviata, and firing the chorus for 3 months to put on a musical (which they have to re-audition for)
Thats what I can recall too, mostly the Shelley Duvall stuff and then also he apparently almost injured Malcolm Mcdowells eyes with the ludovico scene cause they basically did it for real.
The Duvall stuff also is like generally a broader behavior with him but most other actors that comment on it seem to treat it more like a hurdle thats worth overcoming to work with him rather than him being straight up just a bully.
He's pretty good but it's kinda funny he did the whole 'torture an actress and shoot a bajillion takes' auteur thing on the Shining and 100% got a worse performance than what she initially gave on take 3.
Like almost all directors, Kubrick was famously an asshole who treated his actors really badly, but I haven't heard about anything more damning than that.
This has always wierded me out, because all the directors I've worked with, even the difficult ones who I didn't like, have not been assholes and in fact been unfailingly nice even during arguments.
Is this a screen/stage divide thing or a "once you get to the AAA houses you get the obsessed wankers" thing
power of millions of dollars. i don't think any stage performances are dealing with the same level of wealth in the cast & investment in the project
At the top end it's more than you might think. Phantom costs almost a million USD a week to put on Broadway, supposedly. The Vienna Opera house gets about 55 million Euro a year purely in government subsidy, before ticket sales. And it is uh, not turning a profit.
:thonk: 2001's budget adjusted for inflation would be running that phantom show for 84 weeks. which i guess isn't all that long really
15 euro for nosebleeds in an opera house & the government's running it at a loss? :ussr-cry: consequences of the fall
Almost every house in Europe runs a loss, it's been that way since the 1650s, subsidised by either the state or rich assholes, pays starvation wages even to the leads, somehow never makes the money back, rich assholes get tax write off...oh...look...all the production budget went to their set painting side business.
Sydney runs in the black, at the cost of exactly 1 interesting opera a year, the rest horrible stagings of Traviata, and firing the chorus for 3 months to put on a musical (which they have to re-audition for)
justifying my ignorance of opera because of the bourgeois practices and tradition of the houses:denguin:
Thats what I can recall too, mostly the Shelley Duvall stuff and then also he apparently almost injured Malcolm Mcdowells eyes with the ludovico scene cause they basically did it for real.
The Duvall stuff also is like generally a broader behavior with him but most other actors that comment on it seem to treat it more like a hurdle thats worth overcoming to work with him rather than him being straight up just a bully.
He's pretty good but it's kinda funny he did the whole 'torture an actress and shoot a bajillion takes' auteur thing on the Shining and 100% got a worse performance than what she initially gave on take 3.