Least ghoulish capitalists

  • theother2020 [comrade/them, she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t know if this is true-true, but it’s been said that planes and tall buildings don’t have parachutes because dead people are cheaper than badly injured people.

    • familiar [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      There's no situation that justifies putting parachutes for passengers on an airplane. I can't think of a single incident that I've ever heard of (I'm a plane crash enthusiast tbh) where it would have saved even a single life.

      • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Even if you tossed aside any thoughts of actual efficiency, where would you even fit that many parachutes on a commercial airliner? There's already a non-zero chance your luggage ends up on another plane due to weight limits/distribution concerns.

    • asustamepanteon [comrade/them, he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I heard that's why they ask you to get into that bending over in your seat position with your hands over your neck: so that the impacts breaks your neck. Don't know if it's true.

      Edit: it's called brace position, and snopes is calling me out :pinocchio-evil:

      • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I wouldn't put much faith in what Snopes says, since they've fully embraced their role as a neoliberal mouthpiece. But, they're probably correct here.