"Yes we get federal funding but it's only a little bit" + the comments are declaring Twitter has finally become fascist

    • BrezhnevsEyebrows [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      If there's not already there needs to be a website called like Radio Free America or something that satirically turns the spin back on America, I think it would not only be funny but also potentially useful in helping people realize how the corporate news shapes their worldview

  • Dolores [love/loves]
    ·
    2 years ago

    NATIONAL---PUBLIC radio can liberals fucking read :think-mark:

  • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Liberals were all in denial about it being funded by the Kochs back in the late 2010s too, denying it even as NPR itself regularly gave the disclaimer that they recieved Koch funding on relevant stories.

    Also, regardless of funding sources, name one major American news outlet that isn't naked pro-US propaganda. I'll wait.

  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    NPR has been so in the tank on the China Bad coverage. I find this funny as all hell

      • Avanash [they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Libs would be see the Epoch Times is state funded media and be like, “surprised to see China is allowing dissent in the papers it gives money to”

  • CthulhusIntern [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Where's the lie? AP and Reuters, along with all news sources that get their stories from them, should have the same label.

  • ssjmarx [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    lmao remember when Elon first bought it and stuck the state media tag on Ukrainian and European news and people got pissed about that? Like I get he's doing it for bad reasons but I'd much rather the tags be equally-applied than be only applied to non-American sources.

  • footfaults [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think YouTube added that tag to them at least a year or two ago. People are just picking something to be mad at today.

  • Dimmer06 [he/him,comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Notably, however, Twitter has not slapped that label on several media organizations that are substantially funded by government. The Voice of America, the BBC and the U.S. military newspaper Stars and Stripes, among others, continue on Twitter without being designated as “state-affiliated” — a phrase with strong connotations of compromised editorial independence.

    tbf they should probably get on that

  • mittens [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Yes we get federal funding but it’s only a little bit”

    The quasi in quasi-autonomous does a lot of heavy lifting lol

  • TankieTanuki [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    WaPo and NYT should get it too (given how much they repeat Stat Dept memos).

    • Avanash [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No no no you don’t understand. They’re owned by people who bribe the politicians, staffed by people who have had leadership positions in a revolving door of regulatory agencies, get giant chunks of their funding from government grants, and they regularly print government-issued press releases uncritically… but the government considers all of these organizations to be legally distinct, so it’s fine.

  • Antoine_St_Hexubeary [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Centre-right legacy-media institution who recently changed their slogan to "Democracy Dies in Darkness" has opinions about dubious tags

  • solaranus
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator