https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02239-8
International-development researchers in Sweden are in turmoil after the country’s government decided to cut all further public research funding for the field.
On 22 June, the government announced that the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskaprådet; VR), the country’s largest research funder, would no longer offer grants for development research — taking 180 million Swedish kronor (US$16.4 million) off the table with immediate effect.
More than 600 researchers have signed an open letter criticizing the move and calling for its reversal. “The Government’s decision wastes time and energy spent on preparing applications and undermines confidence in the research support system as a whole,” the letter says. “Sweden has been a leading player in development research and research assistance for over 50 years. This position is now seriously undermined.”
The decision to axe funding affects grant applications submitted by around 250 researchers in Sweden, together with dozens of international collaborators based mainly at universities in Africa or Asia.
In 2022, VR approved 60 applications for 2–4 year projects. “We anticipated a similar output from the 2023 call,” says Ingrid Öborn, an agroforestry researcher at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Uppsala, and chair of the VR’s Committee for Development Research from 2022 to 2024. “The aim of the discontinued grants, funded by VR since 2013 from the government’s development-aid budget, was to strengthen Swedish research of the highest quality with particular relevance to poverty alleviation and sustainable development in low-income countries.”
The move follows a budget reduction at the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) in January: a 54% cut, from 960 million in 2022 to 440 million kronor. Fears for the future
The open letter says that the government made the decision without consulting the scientific community, and that a sudden loss of grant funding will have particularly severe consequences for early-career researchers.
Aida Bargués-Tobella, an ecologist at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Umeå, who signed the letter, relies completely on external grants for her income. She had applied for a grant that would have covered 50% of her salary, up to 20% of the salaries of four international collaborators (at the University of Nairobi in Kenya and Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda) and two PhD student stipends, plus fieldwork and travel costs. “It would have been a great opportunity for us to establish ourselves and to build on the collaboration we started three years ago,” says Bargués-Tobella. Now, she is worried about her future and that of the project.
“Due to this abrupt decision, I might seriously consider leaving Sweden after nine years of research here,” says Cristiano Lanzano, a social anthropologist at the Nordic Africa Institute in Uppsala, whose work relies on research-council funding.
“There are many global aspects of development research that we now risk losing,” says Jonas Ewald, a social-studies researcher at Linnaeus University in Växjö, who also signed the letter. He adds that development research is important for addressing global challenges and contributing to better health care, economic development and climate-change mitigation. A change in direction
The government has cited the need to control aid spending as a reason for the cuts. “With the war in Ukraine, we are in an entirely new situation,” says Johan Forssell, the minister for international development, cooperation and foreign trade. “We do not have unlimited resources. The allocation of aid always involves difficult trade-offs, and we are prioritizing the urgent needs in Ukraine.”
“We fully understand that researchers are disappointed by the decision, as they have put time and effort into their applications. At the same time, we note that 98% of the Swedish Research Council’s other appropriations remain intact, from which researchers are welcome to apply for funding,” he adds.
Researchers have countered that the government is confusing humanitarian needs with development research.
The sudden loss of funding “will jeopardize the work done for decades to build up long-term research capacity in low-income countries”, says Hannah Akuffo, who retired from her position as a senior research adviser at Sida last year. “It takes time to build collaborations and research environments that work, both in Sweden and in the global south. Now that long-term endeavour is at risk of being destroyed.”
Oh baby, we're just getting started. Sweden is at the top of the slide that Germany has been riding for decades and the UK is just about to exit into Failed State territory.
Please Ireland, stay the one semi-decent western country.
NEVER touch NATO and NEVER touch the fourteen eyes. Please keep doing what you're doing. But please, look into the labor movement and try to start one there.
Ireland better stay nice because I need somewhere to flee to in a couple years and the is the worst.
Or maybe I should just learn Chinese already
The year is 2045.
All countries in the world have cut public funding to bolster their militaries, despite no new conflicts having broken out in years.
There are no teachers, doctors, firefighters, postal workers anymore.
The world is just soldiers.
everyone being a soldier and there not being a war is just UBI.
The trouble is the US state is too stupid to recognise that you can have military spending as a means of controlling unemployment and not use the army
the Chinese army is the single largest employer on earth and they mainly do parades
The DPRK has mandatory military duty for all citizens, but their military does primarily public services.
Yeah, let’s keep remilitarizing the European subcontinent! That is a good idea that will definitely not end horrifically.
Now taking bets on how many minorities Euronazis murder this time around!
Europe ends up fighting itself for a decade, destroying it's infrastructure. No Marshall plan this time.
cuts public science research fund to increase military budget
TBH how much more science do you really need?
International Development research cut to fuel military.
So we're switching back to the gloves-off imperialism, huh?
Perfect time for china to swoop in and offer flexible research positions. They’ve been doing it to many Chinese Americans who were racially profiled and arrested by the FBI, and some other Americans and British researchers who had funding stripped from them.
cuts public science research fund to increase military budget
You want to become an America clone? Because that's how you become an America clone.
The imperial powers think they'll rule the world like it's the age of colonialism again. They forget that much of the world has caught up in that timeframe.
Mind you, SIDA is basically just a cover for getting Swedish companies in at the ground floor in developing economies. But they were going to cut this regardless, it is just austerity doing austerity things.