In. Six. Parts.
Hilarious that the "Historical Precedent" does not even mention Lyndon B. Johnson, whose drop-out in 1968 (in favor of RFK Sr.) is the obvious comparison here. Instead OP compares Hillary to beloved former president and successful comeback kid... Richard Milhouse Nixon.
OP blames James Comey for 2016.
And to top it all off
Hillary Clinton (a long champion for women’s rights and human’s rights
Yes the former board member of Wal-Mart, the person who brought slavery back to Libya, who was to the right of the Supreme Court on gay rights, this is a "champion of human's rights."
The libs are NOT all right.
You must log in or register to comment.
I would say Jackson and Jefferson are great comps for our "Goldwater Girl."
They ended up being celebrated despite being (literally) historically evil.
Support for a Hillary 2024 candidacy would (1) have historical precedence; and even tends to favor her in a rematch against Trump; (2) be supported by her known ability to win the popular vote and as history even suggests, the electoral vote; (3) and her strengths would be enhanced even further by the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
This is just a satire post right?
as history even suggests, the electoral vote
the history of her losing the electoral vote suggests her ability to win the electoral vote
Why isn't anybody making the case for Hunter? I don't think it's just young blood that we need. We someone with a hog. Watching that debate, it was clear that they were just a couple of gerries having a day, sure, but it was even clearer that neither were slinging. We need Hunter's powerful pepper to bring our country out of this dark division.
I think it is time they considered king Charles III for the position. Only he has the age, physical ailments and sexual misconduct to replace Biden.
Fuck me up fam