• mayo_cider [he/him]
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It's just impossible to clean an oil painting covered with water soluble soup

    And the price of the painting went up by a few millions for the added notoriety

    Who the fuck designed the glass pane so that it didn't cover the frame?

  • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There is nothing priceless about any piece of art ever. Placing a living person's time and life below a simple image is the most egregious fetishism I have seen in a while.

  • bumpusoot [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Protecting the artwork on the Titanic is my new metaphor for how stupid this is.

    I'm a big fan of art, but uncritical support for an endless flow of soup at valuable items until rich people stop killing all of us.

  • anarcho_blinkenist [none/use name]
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You two simply had no right to do what you did to Sunflowers, and your arrogance in thinking otherwise deserves the strongest condemnation.

    WHAT YOU DID TO SUNFLOWERS rage-cry for being an allegedly serious crime, they phrased their condemnation in the silliest way they could

  • tombruzzo [none/use name]
    ·
    4 hours ago

    That plane of glass has never done more work than in this sentence. The glass did its job and the painting is fine.

    By this logic if you shoot at someone and they're behind thick bullet proof glass you've legally murdered them

      • bumpusoot [any]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Shooting in the direction of someone in the full knowledge that your bullet will not possibly hit them is not attempted murder. It's.. actually not any crime.

        • Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I'd say it was property damage to the window so vandalism? What about intimidating? Or are you saying they person behind the window is in on the shooting for lulz?

          • bumpusoot [any]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I mean, this is obviously taking the analogy too far for argument's sake. You can't intimidate a painting and soup doesn't damage glass.

    • tombruzzo [none/use name]
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The judge is probably old as fuck so global warming will just mean he can go on retirement cruises all year round

  • pastalicious [he/him, undecided]
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I've seen the video. 10k in damage to the frame is absurd. If someone simply cleaned the soup within an hour or two of them throwing soup on it then it was as good as new. If they left it to soak in for 24 hours and damage the wood then that's negligence on the museum's part.

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]
    ·
    7 hours ago

    ukkk Keep doing this to your climate activists and soon enough their sentences won't even be able to be completed because the prisons will be underwater.

    • VILenin [he/him]
      ·
      6 hours ago

      When the climate disaster has escalated to that point, they will have already switched to summary executions

  • barrbaric [he/him]
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Didn't the UK arrest some activists before they did anything a while back? Sink that hellhole already.