Every two days a new thread with hundreds of comments of a bunch of liberals doing the same fucking talking points about the election. It doesn't even fucking matter but so many people are just so enthusiastic to be hand-wringing or smug or whatever their preferred flavor of insufferable is, presumably mostly because they've been acculturated by liberal media to the idea that Trump is the apocalypse despite the fact that we already saw how Trump bumbles his way through a term!

It's just so bad, you can't talk about it anywhere there without someone leaping down your throat to say the same shit you've heard before.

    • SexUnderSocialism [she/her]M
      ·
      27 days ago

      Everyone is biased, dipshit. Including you and the sources you get your news from. Not understanding something as fundamental as this makes your smugness even more embarrassing than it already is. Keep it up.

        • REgon [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          peltier-laugh

          Yeah I'm certain David Van Zandts personal vibes-based website is completely unbiased.

          Edit: sorry comrade, didn't realise you weren't the same doofus as the other guy

        • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Ah yes, the notoriously not-biased fact checkers. /s

          EDIT: HAHAHAHA. They have this rating for some countries, and you want to claim that they are not biased? HAHAHAHA

          MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: TOTAL OPPRESSION

          EDIT 2: HAHAHA. Their rating for Pissrael is 'MODERATE FREEDOM'.

          You were joking when you said that they aren't biased, weren't you?

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          deleted by creator

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
      ·
      27 days ago

      Tagline material.

      Marxists.org is a collection of works on political theory. They aren't really biased beyond wanting to preserve the works and provide easy access to them.

      The link is to something written by Lenin in 1917, referencing something Marx wrote earlier. I suppose you could say that Lenin and Marx were biased in the sense that they had strong views but that isn't a valid reason to dismiss everything they ever said, and that ignorant perspective is just going to get you laughed at here.

      • EllenKelly [comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Tbh some of the translations could use work, but they are republishing work they didnt translate themselves

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
      ·
      27 days ago

      marxists.org is an archive of hundreds of thousands of texts by influential sociologists, historians, political economists and political theorists. It's not our "facts" it's an argument in the form of a written text. Perhaps you should sit down and take the time to read sometimes and maybe learn something.

    • REgon [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      They're quoting Marx which is being hosted on marxists.org, you brick.

      Also everyone is biased, objective reporting is literally impossible. Learn how to do source critique and text analysis instead of just gargling the same thought-killing propaganda you've been regurgitating your whole life

    • EllenKelly [comrade/them]
      ·
      26 days ago

      Want to come over, I'll read it to you directly from a book?

      space cadet

      noun

      1. One who shows difficulty in grasping or responding appropriately to serious or necessary concerns; a spacy person.

      good bit tbh, sorry anyone wasted their time responding to you

    • D61 [any]
      ·
      26 days ago

      Tell me you're an "enlightened centrist" without telling me you're an enlightened centrist... bateman-business-card