• kilternkafuffle [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      -Added fake ballot box minigame

      I love that one so much!!! I'd play it by itself to be honest. The hassle of grinding political activism and the stress of the outcome actually mattering are major downsides of overall Politics game. The ballot box should be released as its own spinoff, at least on mobile. I'd vote the shit out of it.

  • Coolbean [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Remember when they said they’d riot if the post office was defunded? Lol

  • WhatsUpPup [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I’d be interested in reading about how the Democratic Party and the media cut the balls off the libs following the women’s march and airport protests. The first year of the trump presidency was marked by liberals becoming increasingly active in protesting, and after that first women’s march and the airport protest something happened where it just didn’t happen again with the same intensity.

    • hauntingspectre [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      The subsequent women's marches dissolved into woke idpol fights. The airport protests were around a discrete event, and considered "successful" at the time. But honestly I think outrage fatigue killed more actions like that.

      • WhatsUpPup [none/use name]
        ·
        4 years ago

        outrage fatigue killed more actions like that

        Yup I think it probably had a lot to do with it. Seems the GOP took the same track as they did in 2003, let everyone protest until they’re exhausted and just do your evil shit anyway.

        • CommieGirl69 [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Yup I think it probably had a lot to do with it. Seems the GOP took the same track as they did in 2003, let everyone protest until they’re exhausted and just do your evil shit anyway.

          most governments do this, see piñera in chile

          this is why protesting by itself is not the way to force their hand, it's a show of strength at most, even if you start breaking shit

          to be forceful it needs to be followed by shit like striking, blocking roads/main streets, etc, and libs will never do that

      • RNAi [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        4 years ago

        The subsequent women’s marches dissolved into woke idpol fights

        Tell me more about it

        • hauntingspectre [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          The NYC one dissolved because after trying to bring Black women's orgs into them, info came out tying some of their leadership to Farrakhan, and then the existing white leadership didn't want to associate with those groups, etc. Etc., and the marches just fizzled (my memory is probably a little fuzzy on the details).

          • RNAi [he/him]
            hexagon
            ·
            4 years ago

            Farrakhan

            Is it bad whatever that is?

            • hauntingspectre [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              Farrakhan? Yeah. He's a weirdo. Nation of Islam is his joint, and he's pretty famously anti-Semitic. Now, some of the women's groups pointed out that they felt he was still due some respect from his earlier activism, when he was one of the few Black leaders with neighborhood ties who was doing street level work with his organization, but (IMO) he's long descended into crankdom. Plus, white women demanding Black women denounce a Black man is a fraught subject.

              • garbology [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                4 years ago

                Plus, white women demanding Black women denounce a Black man is a fraught subject.

                And they still did it and were endorsed by 9 separate rabbis, And it still wasn't enough to prevent schism by chuddy folks

                https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/On-Womens-March-Sarsour-rejects-Farrakhans-antisemitism-defends-BDS-578056

            • disco [any]
              ·
              4 years ago

              He was the head of the Nation of Islam, and a huge anti Semite.

        • dayruiner [they/them]
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 years ago

          I remember there was drama about it being mostly white women in the first place and very little POC representation in leadership and such and how white women overwhelmingly voted Trump in the first place (something like 90% of em). And also the whole pussy hat thing and a lot of signs referencing uteruses and such that were criticized for excluding trans women.

            • dayruiner [they/them]
              ·
              4 years ago

              I confused a different statistic that I saw at the time, the actual statistic was 53% per a search. And even that is apparently disputed.

              • RNAi [he/him]
                hexagon
                ·
                4 years ago

                Oooooohhhh riiiight the pussy hat cuz it's like cat ears but pussy power or some shit like that.

                They should have used "Kill Them All" as rally cry.

            • dayruiner [they/them]
              ·
              4 years ago

              It's a reference to pussies i.e. vulvas/vaginas which trans women don't always have

          • RNAi [he/him]
            hexagon
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            90% of wh*te women voted Trump? WHAT

            • dayruiner [they/them]
              ·
              4 years ago

              Nvm apparently the statistic was misleading, I just looked it up. But at the time it was used to imply that WW were being insincere and weren't actual allies and stuff.

  • OhWell [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Imagine thinking libs will ever burn anything down or radicalize. They aren't going to do jack shit but keep voting every 4 years.