- cross-posted to:
- usa@midwest.social
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/25530156
It took three ER visits and 20 hours before a hospital admitted Nevaeh Crain, 18, as her condition worsened. Doctors insisted on two ultrasounds to confirm “fetal demise.” She’s one of at least two Texas women who died under the state’s abortion ban.
You must log in or register to comment.
The first hospital diagnosed her with strep throat without investigating her sharp abdominal cramps. At the second, she screened positive for sepsis, a life-threatening and fast-moving reaction to an infection, medical records show. But doctors said her six-month fetus had a heartbeat and that Crain was fine to leave.
Someone is going to have to step up to be Dr. Morgentaler
On October 17, 1967, he presented a brief on behalf of the Humanist Association of Canada before a House of Commons Health and Welfare Committee that was investigating the issue of illegal abortion. Morgentaler stated that women should have the right to safe abortion. The reaction to his public testimony surprised him: he began to receive calls from women who wanted abortions. Robert Malcolm Campbell and Leslie Alexander Pal wrote, "Henry Morgentaler experienced the [abortion] law's limitations directly in the supplications of desperate women who visited his Montreal office." Morgentaler's initial response was to refuse:
"I hadn't expected the avalanche of requests and didn't realize the magnitude of the problem in immediate, human terms. I answered, 'I sympathize with you. I know your problem, but the law won't let me help you. If I do help you, I'll go to jail, I lose my practice—I have a wife and two children. I'm sorry, but I just can't!'"
For a time he was able to refer the women to two other doctors who did abortions, but they became unavailable. There was no one to whom he could send them, and some of them were ending up in the emergency department after amateur abortions. He has said that he felt like a coward for sending them away and that he was shirking his responsibility. Eventually, in spite of the risks to himself—loss of career, a prison term for years or for life—he decided to perform abortions and, at the same time, challenge the law. ...
He knew that he could prevent those unnecessary deaths, so he determined to use civil disobedience to change the law.
In 1968, Morgentaler gave up his family practice and began performing abortions in his private clinic. He devoted his clinic to performing abortions on women as well as providing birth control and contraceptives, though it was illegal at the time.
Read the rest of the article to learn about how as a child in Poland he was incarcerated in nazi concentration camps for being jewish. Then as an adult in Quebec, incarcerated for performing abortions.
Daily reminder to liberals that doctors and other authority figures will intentionally kill you if they don't like you
Please help Aya in Gaza ❤️ 🇵🇸https://gofund.me/1222af19This was fully intended. You think a bunch of cackling, card-carrying fascists actually have a convenient sensitive side towards babies? No. This was fully intentional as they are happy to utilize any avenue towards femicide you can think of.
fuck this gilead shithole.
whatever you are doing now is what you'd do in a fascist theocracy.
This is happening under the Biden-Harris regime, right now.
This is what I'm trying to tell Our Revolution texters. It's happening now and you're all at Brunch because you want to make it a fucking campaign issue. You have power NOW.
Why didn’t the dems pass abortion rights into law when they had a veto-proof majority under Obama?
they had the foresight to determine fundraising futures. something you terminally online anti capitalists can never understand
Imagine saying out loud the dems care more about money than about doing anything to help people, in support of the dems
How is the cycle of endlessly pursuing money and power for its own sake working out? Oh they’re now running their most right wing campaign in decades? Very cool.
Imagine saying out loud the dems care more about money than about doing anything to help people, in support of the dems
Money makes the world go around. Do you know what would happen if the world stopped turning? In this 15 minute Bill and Melinda Gates funded video essay I will...
That Supreme Court also decided the president can MOAB them and be immune but it’s important to have an entire lame duck party.
We need Obama to come back and do one last
, as a treat
Abortion rights were lost while Democrats controlled the White House and both chambers of congress. What does that tell you about the Democrats?
Dems had many opportunities to oppose an abortion ban. Before RvW was overturned and after.
Which happened because the genius Pied Piper Strategy Democrats colluded the media to prop up Trump to make him viable z oh and running a deeply unpopular warmonger as a candidate. Now they use him as a shield to do genocide and shame people into supporting a deeply unpopular warmonger, look the other way to women's and LGBTQ rights as they suffer because the issues just aren't a priority.
How the Hillary Clinton campaign deliberately "elevated" Donald Trump with its "pied piper" strategy
Show
Typical Trump taking credit for something he didn’t actually do, smdh
The post is deleted so I assume it's some lib shit about voting bloo no matter who.
Are you doing anything besides voting?
Liberals don't understand that it's always been like this since the first settlers stepped off the boat
It took the conservative movement 50 years to repeal Roe v Wade. The day it was decided conservative forces were already working proactively to overturn this decision. For 50 years RBG criticized the case, stating its reasoning was weak and could be subject to legal attack.
For 50 years Democrats have run on codifying Roe v Wade only to abandon the task after getting elected.
In his first run for election, Bill Clinton told women voters he would support strengthening Roe. Even though his record on the matter was less then good [NYT July 20, 1992]:
The 1989 issue, hastily compiled before a Supreme Court ruling that many believed could abolish the rights established in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, said Mr. Clinton "refused to state a position on abortion." Ms. Wright responded, "I don't know why they said that," saying she had sent many newspaper clippings.
The next time around, said a former Naral staff member, Lisa Swanson, Mr. Clinton's office faxed at least three different statements. In the version published in 1991, Mr. Clinton said: "I do not favor repeal of Roe v. Wade. Until the fetus can live outside the mother's womb, I believe the decision on abortion should be the woman's, not the Government's." The statement noted Mr. Clinton's past support of parental notification for minors and restrictions on state financing of abortions.
In the 1992 issue, Mr. Clinton waxed passionate. "The Government simply has no right to interfere with decisions that must be made by women of America to make the right choice," he said. He added, "Although I have supported certain limited restrictions upon Government funding for abortions, I would not veto any bill requiring Medicaid funding that passed Congress." Accepting Status Quo
Operating in a state government where money issues were far more visible than moral ones, Mr. Clinton tended to accept the status quo on abortion. Although Arkansas was one of the few states to legalize abortion before 1973, by the time Mr. Clinton took office in 1979, state policy prohibited financing of poor women's abortions, with rare exceptions.
Governor Clinton made no move to alter the policy. When anti-abortion forces pushed for a constitutional amendment to codify the prohibition, Mr. Clinton questioned the need, saying "We don't use any state money for abortions." Arkansas voters narrowly defeated the amendment in 1986, and approved it 52 to 48 percent in 1988.
In 1989, Mr. Clinton took an active part in modifying bills to require notification of both of parents before a minor's abortion. In recent interviews, the legislation's sponsors recalled Mr. Clinton's insistence on liberal exceptions in cases when one parent was absent or abusive, and his strengthening of the judicial bypass provision required under Supreme Court rulings.
Under his terms as present zero movement was made on codifying Roe as a right.
Obama also told women, specifically at speaking engagements for Planned Parenthood, that one of his top priorities was to codify Roe day one.
Here is his legacy on the matter [Politifact, June 1, 2012]:
After initially vowing to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, President Barack Obama quickly said it's not his "highest legislative priority."
That was in March 2009. Since then, it has scarcely been mentioned. A version of the bill was last introduced in Congress in 2007, and no new bill has appeared since.
We asked NARAL Pro-Choice America, an abortion rights group, to assess the progress on this issue.
"The protection of Roe v. Wade in federal law remains a long-term priority for NARAL Pro-Choice America and the pro-choice community. Unfortunately, the composition of Congress (including the first two years of President Obama's term) did not include enough pro-choice votes to pass legislation like the Freedom of Choice Act," NARAL said in a statement
Keep in mind, there were not enough pro-choice votes while Obama enjoyed a filibuster proof super majority. This means that not every democrat was pro choice, and they could not secure 100% buy in from the party.
Joe Biden ran on codifying Roe v Wade in 2020, but those efforts have stalled due to poor house and senate numbers [Politifact, March 7, 2004].
As his campaign ramped up in 2024 before he was outted as the presidential candidate, he again took up the mantal as a champion for Roe. His position is interesting, considering his personal stance on abortion. [ABC News, 2024]
The young Catholic politician who once said Roe v. Wade “went too far” — and who to this day remains uneasy with the procedure — is now casting himself as the only thing standing between women and strict national abortion bans.
But when it comes to issues like abortion, amnesty, and acid, I’m about as liberal as your grandmother. I don’t like the Supreme Court decision on abortion. I think it went too far. I don’t think that a woman has the sole right to say what should happen to her body.
But now that he is out of the race, abortion is again back on the menu. One could wonder as well, what the state of things might look like if RBG took all the criticisms she had about the Roe decision to heart and retired under the Obama administration, allowing for a liberal president to add another liberal justice to the courts. However, its clear she was a prideful and arrogant justice, maybe the clout that came with Roe went to her head:
Ginsburg said that “anybody who thinks that if I step down, Obama could appoint someone like me, they’re misguided.” No one as liberal as she was could get confirmed, she suggested. She noted that her work production hadn’t slowed. “She had beaten the odds every day of her life and had weathered serious illness in 1999 and 2010,” Resnik says. “Fairly, from her perspective, she saw herself as able to manage the health challenges of aging.
"No one as liberal as she was could get confirmed, she suggested", really encapsulates just how arrogant she was. The very notion that somehow, the little girls inspired by her legacy, and now primed to take her place, would be less progressive then her rings as absurd. Only a over inflated sense of self could lead one to believe that.
It's not often you watch someone push themselves off the glass cliff. Because of her thick headedness we will never know if the repeal of Roe could have been stalled.
Democrats are the "Big Tent" party, and that includes homophobes and misogynists, and means even with a majority, you will not see Roe be put into law.
Facts are illegal to liberals, you've got to remember that they live in their own post truth world
throw buckets of blood on democrats to symbolize the people they've allowed to be murdered so they could could win politically.
I know, right? that's why we have to elect Biden this November to get Trump out of office!
joe biden is the only person on the planet earth capable of defeating trump in a fair electoral and pushup contest. it was true in 2016, it was true in 2020, and it's just as true today!
the situation isn't funny, but that got me
