Linked above is his "Duty To Warn" letter he claims to have sent to the White House sounding the alarm that the 2024 election was stolen. Since this letter, he has heard nothing from the Harris team. This silence prompted him to write another substack post entitled: If you see Something, say Something? Wherein he bellows about the lack of action from the Harris team. He paints himself as a hardened veteran of the field, and even as someone who apparently catches election hacking on the regular. He remains baffled by the idea that the status quo must be maintained, even in the face of the total collapse of "US Democracy".
/r/somethingiswrong2024 has taken him as their prophet, and now hang on his every word. Posts about getting him NEW informaiton, posts about his interviews, it goes on and on.
Spoonamore was apparently on The Thom Heartman Program, which was apparently a bid deal for people following this "recount" effort. He seems to have coined this term, that sits at the center of his theory, called "Bullet Ballots". I attempted to do a little searching on "Bullet Ballots" and the only results I get are people talking about Spoonamore. According to Spoonamore, a "Bullet Ballot" is one where no down ballot options are selected. It is strictly a selection for the president, and somehow he knows (based on data) that Donald Trump had an "above average" amount of "bullet ballots" to the tune of 600,000 ballots. This, he claims, is what stole the election.
It isn't just isolated to Reddit. People on Threads, Twitter, Tiktok, and even Hacker News, are discussing Spoonamore and his "Bullet Ballot" theory. With only two substack posts and almost no other history, somehow this Spoonamore guy cracked the whole case on Trump election fraud, but no one of significance cares to listen.
First of all: fuck yes love this 100%
Once again liberals doing a better job then we could ever dream of by demonstrating they're exactly the same as the chuds.
Second of all the "bullet ballots" being a smoking gun (no pun intended)
Firts of all their claim that only like 0.3% of ballots normally only have a vote for president doesn't pass the sniff test. Watch any interview with an American voter and you will quickly realize probablly 30% don't even realize they're voting for anything other than president, there is no way the percentage is that low.
Then on top of that this election could not have been more explicitly a direct refrutiation of democrats entire worldview. I wouldn't be surprised if a double digit percent of voters just voted for "fuck Biden, maga!!!!" And couldn't even tell you what any other position on the ballot actually was.
And that before you get to the part where there no fucking way that this guy has anywhere close to that level of data on voting trends.
this guy has anywhere close to that level of data on voting trends.
That's the part that really blows my mind. Where is the data? Where is the spreadsheet so I can crunch the numbers? Also, the data that is stored at the state level for each election is a nightmare. I don't know if you've ever tried to find it, but every state has a different file format, a different structure to the data, in some cases the data is just missing or incomplete. So I have no idea where he is getting this data from. MIT has a whole lab dedicated to studying election data, and even they don't have complete datasets.
Yea liberals have fully deteriorated to the point of liking a screenshot of a tweet that says what they already think without even needing a link to a real tweet let alone the li k to the claim being made by the tweet.
Because they're just blue Maga now
At no point in the last 3 years of conflicts and wars have the neoliberals ever needed evidence to back up their claims. Their words are axioms, objective truths from the mouth of god, and you are a heathen for even daring to question them. Of course the same would apply to an election.
I think we have to remember that spoonamore is not (nor is he claiming to be) an election expert or a statistician. His math does seem wrong, but his real expertise is in hacking. So the things he says in his letter about how a hack could have potentially worked is more important than the math. This may not be the real story, and it's very important to fact check, but his expertise in addition to the other letter from security experts the other day both can give insight into the vulnerabilities with the voting machines. All of this is important.
This is how you know this is different than 2020.
We have graphs and data.
They had feelings.
Lmao BLUEANON RISE UP
These people clearly didnt watch MIke Pillow's cyber symposium, they had hella charts and graphs
Show
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
WE GOT GRAPHS AND DATA!
(Weights and fish meme reference, don't look it up if you don't want to see gutted fish)
Had to look this up and apparently these guys were clearing out every fishing competition in the area with weighted fish. They won a whole boat!
You should probably clarify in the content warning that fish are being visibly cut open to remove the weights. I don't really care but "fish stuffed with weights" isn't really descriptive and a lot of people wouldn't want to see it
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
My favorite part of the r/somethingiswrong2024 sub is that they occasionally get mad at people for outlining outrageously convoluted scenarios where Kamala is working with the CIA and the DOJ to arrest Trump on January 6 but the reason they get mad is that the speculation is "probably" too close to the truth and could give Trump/Elon/whoever time to counteract the plan if people post about it on their 15000 member subreddit
At least this guy has a face. Also lol at Hacker news buying this bullshit. STEM bros once again proving they’re complete dumbasses outside of their specific speciality
Still less clownish than the person who was saying the election was rigged because Starlink runs Linux, and Linux apparently can't tally votes from more than one party.
It can't though. Linux has no built in vote counting function.
Donald Trump had an "above average" amount of "bullet ballots" to the tune of 600,000 ballots. This, he claims, is what stole the election.
Even in the stolen election fantasy Trump still overwhelmingly wins the popular vote
A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.
I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
GRAPHS AND DATA DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS 
Oh, yeah? Then how do you explain 
let's go