Link to the article

This makes her “strategy” even more baffling than before. How do you know you are down the entire time and do absolutely nothing about policy?

    • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would have spent 1.5 billions just paying people's debts and saying "brought to you by the Kamala Harris campaign".

      • sisatici [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Tbh that seems very illegal. Not that laws apply to ruling class

        • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
          ·
          1 month ago

          The Democratic institution would never stand for giving collected funds to anyone but rich people.

          It would make a good strategy for the PSL though. Now that they've gotten 0.1% of the vote, instead of running a conventional campaign, they could do 20% what they've already been doing, and 80% "this debt has been forgiven of you by the PSL, vote for us" and build a reputation as the people who go around forgiving debt (instead of the people who show up at all the peaceful protests with those yellow-and-black signs).

      • Florn [they/them]
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why do you think there's so many hyena harrises floating around?

    • Bureaucrat
      ·
      1 month ago

      Brewsters millions but worse

        • Bureaucrat
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think that's a modern issue really. Plenty of good/better/equal remakes around. Scarface for example.
          Just none from current time

          • Ellen_musk_ox@lemm.ee
            ·
            1 month ago

            For sure.

            It seems like what's missing in modern remakes is a willingness to try something new and in the present context. But I have a hunch it's less so film makers wanting to and more so studios wanting a guarantee on return.

            Good art tends not to work that way. It's always going to involve risk.