“The United States does need to get tough with China,” Biden wrote last spring. “The most effective way to meet that challenge is to build a united front of U.S. allies and partners to confront China’s abusive behaviors and human rights violations,” while enlisting China’s participation in solving problems such as climate change and North Korea.
Lmao, Biden's foreign policy team wants to intensify efforts to destroy China while expecting that China will be happy to betray an ally on behalf of America.
Also what fucking ghouls "solving the North Korean problem", I wonder what sort of final solutions that would entail.
like the thing about nk is that china probably has the same effect of them having a nuke as long as they don't cause problems for china i don't think they need the nuke like i don't think china would allow american troops to get in there in a official manner at all but it is a good insurance so mr kim please keep the nuke
China's foreign policy has pretty much always been realpolitik. If I were the DPRK, I wouldn't want the existence of my state to hinge on it being beneficial for China.
Bomb, baby, bomb.
biden is doing his best to make trump look like the lesser evil
I think that Trump is more personally evil, but Biden will have an ideologically coherent cabinet and won't get in the way of their evil as Trump does. And Biden is also very evil.
The difference is that Trump and the neo-cons surrounding him would be more than happy to torpedo NATO and fuck up the empire if it makes them more money. That's all they are motivated by.
so like drone striking venezuela might be a thing next year thanks biden
Not to be confused with the "my boyfriend is black" policy, which is a really good way of getting triggered mayo youtube comments
THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN THE LIBS ARE AT IT AGAIN
