Greetings gamers and those who wisely abstain,

It has become clear to us that even in the short while we’ve federated, the situation with sh.itholefor.nazis is entirely untenable and we will be defederating immediately. Multiple instances of ableist and homophobic slurs directed at our users, overwhelming litigiousness against even the most innocuous comments by our users, and just a general ethos of reactionary behavior. We’re done and out.

One of the concerns with embracing TC69 thought on site bans with federation is that the user would basically be just hexbear-side hidden and blocked from our comms, free to post reactionary content without the fear of Lenin behind them. That was a silly concern. We will resume our pre-federation policies regarding site bans.

:07:

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disappointing. We picked up real support among some there.

    All we are doing is isolating ourselves from ideological participation, and thus leaving the npc libs that are otherwise amenable to hearing our side at the mercy of fascists without opposition.

    My position is that time should be allowed to play out to ban the fascists and clear house, this is a process that takes time when federating because initially there are a lot of them and they don't all make themselves known at the same time. As time goes on however and more and more get added to the banlist the issue would die down, leaving out the fascists while leaving the npc libs still capable of hearing what the left has to say.

    • AcidSmiley [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      My position is that you cannot federate with an instance full of fascists if you're operating a safe space for trans people. The shit that we had to endure during last few days made me seriously consider to leave the site, and i'm still unsure if this is the right place for me when people think we should grow our userbase with recovering nazis. If this repeats itself, i'm definitely gone.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        And mine is the same as it has always been, I participated here with the expectation we were aiming to build a pipeline to create socialists, just as we had done in many spaces on reddit. While simultaneously at the same time taking advantage of the slow downfall of reddit and setting up a future of non-corporate spaces off-reddit.

        I've said many times before, I'm not here to create a socialist play house. I want to create socialists. And if this place is just creating an insular distraction for socialists to hide themselves away from capitalism on the internet then it is not something I will support. I get why some people want that, but I don't see it as good for socialism. I have the same negative attitude towards most communes, where people just end up building them for escapism from capitalism, not for influencing society and building real socialism. I don't want a digital commune for escapism. I'm not really sure where I'm at with it right now, but I do feel quite negative and like I'm edging close to leaving, I keep asking what the point of being here is, how it's productive for socialism, and I can't answer that anymore. I'd end up going to any spaces that are simply connected to as much as possible where I can do influence, but if many of us do that also we just become considerably weakened without the large collective of people that is considerably weakened in strength.

        • NewLeaf
          ·
          1 year ago

          I totally see where you're coming from, and mostly agree. However, when I'm having a poor mental health day, it's nice to come here and know I won't run into the stuff that crushes my soul. I would be interested in all of us having a discussion about how best to mint new leftists

          I think federation has netted us a decent handful of people though. Glad that happened.

          • Awoo [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think one of the more significant things that worries me is that the existence of lemmygrad and hexbear on lemmy as defederated socialist spaces actually sucks socialists out of the rest of lemmy.

            If you're a socialist these are attractive, you move to them, and you stop participating in the parts of lemmy that are defederated.

            This essentially reduces the pool of socialists in the rest of lemmy, and fundamentally makes starting a socialist space anywhere else on lemmy with impact less successful because all the socialists are here instead.

            If I leave hexbear I probably drop lemmy entirely because it just wouldn't be worth starting socialist spaces on the other instances, it would just be too slow and as soon as socialists get wind of hexbear or lemmygrad they'd abandon ship anyway. I'm still doing stuff on stormfront of course, I guess more of my effort would end up there.

            I dunno. I'm not really sure about the matter. I feel very drained and flakey over the systematic isolation the bear has gone through though, through both internal and external forces.

            • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              By far the biggest obstacle to me is that the vast majority of Redditor refugees are Ledditors, people addicted to Reddit who are only here because spez took away their third-party app, more Redditor than your average Redditor. This means that ideologically speaking, they are far more likely to be on that pro-NATO Slava Ukraini bullshit than your average Redditor, who's already more on that pro-NATO Slava Ukraini bullshit than your average person walking down the street. Talking to them is basically talking to a wall. There's a slim chance in hell we'll actually meaningfully convert Ledditors.

              Besides their greater ideological commitment to the liberal status quo, Ledditors also just want Lemmy to be Reddit 2.0. They are rather explicit in their political project, if you can call it that. They just want Reddit without spez. That's literally the extent of their "vision." They treat instances as backup servers so if one instance's /c/games goes down, they can make the same "Steam sales backlog" joke in another server's /c/games. And since Reddit is fundamentally anti-communist, their Ledditor monoculture will also be anti-communist.

              Spez will continue to fuck up, but I don't think he'll fuck up to the point where people who aren't chronically addicted to Reddit will also leave Reddit, with some inevitably migrating to Lemmy. If he takes away old.reddit or RES, sure there will be another Reddit exodus, but it'll just be more Ledditor losers because your average person doesn't know what old.reddit or RES is.

              Until the fediverse reaches a point where it can attract people who aren't chronic Redditors with Reddit brainworms, we'll be forever stuck with this cycle of Ledditors filling the fediverse with their Reddit bullshit after spez fucked them over before crawling back to spez after jonesing for updoots.

              We are easily the biggest (and arguably only) instance that has formed a distinct culture away from Reddit bullshit, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. (Hexbear's culture is basically some bizarre Reddit/Twitter hybrid with Twitch chat emote spam characteristics.) I don't think any instance could easily form that would simultaneously not be absorbed by us nor be drowned by Ledditors trying to recreate Reddit on their instance. I think to solve the Ledditor problem, we have to be more creative in how and who to outreach. For example, there can effort towards getting /r/thedeprogram or various leftist Discords to create a Lemmy instance.

              I guess the fundamental question is we want more socialists on Lemmy, but would onboarding an existing community like /r/thedeprogram or having Hexbear spinoff instances like a vegan.hexbear count or does it only count when we convert pre-existing liberals into socialists?

      • NewLeaf
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have faith in the mods here. They will always have your back. We have a great little community here

        • AcidSmiley [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I trust the mods and i know they have my back, but creating and maintaining a safe space isn't just about removing harmful content in time, it's about not giving the userbase the feeling they have to worry about that kind of thing.

          • NewLeaf
            ·
            1 year ago

            I fully agree. One of my favorite things about being here is I don't have to encounter chuddery. When I'm having an especially tough mental health day, it's nice to come here and shit on libs with y'all

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The main problem is that sh.itjust.works was too reactionary. It's probably the most reactionary instance we had federated thus far. Like, their entire name is "lolol we call ourselves SJW lololol." It's one thing to have an anti-communist userbase with "apolitical" management that we can push back and draw people on our side and to our site (this is basically lemm.ee), but once you have anti-communist mods running around hiding their power level while subtly trying to get people on board with the fascist pipeline where even the lemm.ee Ledditor noticed something fishy, it's time to write off the instance as a loss and pull the plug. Just look at how Goat acts and how they're pretty good at having plausible deniability even when the mask slips sometimes. They aren't just some clueless sinophobic Ledditor, but is 100% a fascist hiding their power level. They're an opp and should be treated as such.

      For me, I'm still of the mind that people should defederate from us rather than we defederate from them, but I'm not going to miss them at all. None of the rank and file added value to Hexbear at all and unlike blahaj, they don't have any real people from marginalized communities to onboard. They're just a bunch of Canadian Ledditors who think an instance called SJW is top kek, so they can all get fucked.

      • forcequit [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        ngl seeing goat's meanwhileongrad efforts really made the whole thing laughable for me. Yes they're an unrepentant fascist but they have no audience even amongst their own users

        • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it's actually a reference to something Todd Howard said during the showcase for Fallout 4 that became a meme.

    • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don't disagree with the idea, but having seen some of the vile DM's our users have been receiving, protecting this space for marginalized comrades was the right call.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I and others received those DMs from Lemm.ee users too. Real nasty stuff, but it died off. In part I think because @sunaurus@lemm.ee was happy to permaban people for sending such PMs. As long as the SJW admins were doing that I would expect it to die down after some time cleaning house. The benefit here is that our presence in federation would also get the people behaving this way permabanned and act as a suppressing effect for that kind of behaviour - positively improving SJW. Assuming they actually take the action on it like Sun did/does.

        If however they weren't taking those actions then the whole post and reason for defederation would be different in my mind, because it wouldn't just be about bad users it would be about bad administration protecting that behaviour and by extension fostering it (the same issue as blahaj).

        • TomboyShulk [she/her]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Mods were blanket-removing Hexbear posts/comments, even innocuous ones. Signal enough they were unwilling to cooperate shrug-outta-hecks

        • artificialset [she/her, fae/faer]
          ·
          1 year ago

          The benefit here is that our presence in federation would also get the people behaving this way permabanned and act as a suppressing effect for that kind of behaviour - positively improving SJW

          let's be clear that this would be at the expense of trans comrades who may not be in the headspace to deal with harassment like this. if we're truly a place that values our queer comrades, this is 100% at odds with that

    • silent_water [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      they've been targeting trans women to DM nasty stuff to. dunking and re-educating is all well and good but targeted harassment is a step too far.

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        But a lot of people aren't fully conscious. They are coasting through life without understanding ideology. They are political non-participants.

        The communists, the neoliberals, the fascists? They are participants.

        It's a group that is worth talking about and having a word for. Whether you want to make up a new word for them or not I don't care but I won't pretend it's not useful to be able to discuss them.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          deleted by creator

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Their ideological laziness is no reason to fall into equally lazy "sheeple"-like rhetoric

          • Awoo [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even the 1800s and 1900s communists were using "the masses" and implying a significant difference existed between the politically active of the party and the reactionaries compared to the politically inactive of "the masses". I suppose you could use this today but it's not as obvious when you have the very specific intent of communicating about others as politically deactivated vs politically activated.

        • silent_water [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          But a lot of people aren't fully conscious. They are coasting through life without understanding ideology. They are political non-participants.

          this is a reactionary way of describing the lack of political consciousness. they are fully aware, they're just stewing in false consciousness. it's important not to confuse that with an actually degrade state of consciousness.

          • Awoo [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            I fundamentally disagree. Most of them don't have false consciousness. False consciousness is a concrete and describable thing. It is an absence of any consciousness, they default to the status quo and vote every few years but otherwise neither follow politics nor really care a great deal, generally because they're comfortable.

        • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          they already have a name, "apos", the "apolitical"
          no need to drop into "npc" shit

          • Awoo [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            They're not apolitical though. They default to the status quo when you force some politics out of them. But they are non-participants otherwise. Maybe voting every few years but not really paying attention or taking part outside of that.

          • Awoo [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            This group are primarily a criminal element, whereas I'm referring to a generally unconscious group of politically de-activated workers. The best word you see for this is usually just "masses", but "the masses" has a different problem in that it often feels like it implies the masses can't stop being the masses by joining the politically activated groups (communists, fascists, etc).

            My general point here is that you have the politically active, the politically aware, and then the politically inactive and politically unaware. These last 2 groups are what get referred to as "NPCs" by the right because they only view the politically active as participants in the "game", where the game being referred to is politics. People that exist but are not player characters, they exist to be influenced by the player characters.

            I don't really disagree with others that this language has problems though to be honest, I just don't feel like an adequate replacement word has appeared that really captures it as well as this.

    • JuneFall [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think some federation leftover is good, but I also think that we ought to look at how we can deal with the contradiction of safe space for marginalized users who brought their perspectives up on one hand and the want to be a visible public force for anarcho and communist talking points.

      When we find a process for that we ought to see how hexbear wants to move forward (i.e. try again).

      I wouldn't mind a breathing or ocean like ebb and tide mechanism. Withdraw a bit (except from some instances), deal with technical and social means to stop the negatives, find a bit of unity and expand again.

      Though it seems to be good to be permanently federating with some instances, as there is habituation that hexbear is there, most of the problems seem to be in the first few days/weeks when our culture is accepted or a local interaction with it is created.

      • silent_water [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        the best idea I've heard is setting up a containment instance -- lib.rehab or whatever -- and have that instance federated widely while hexbear itself keeps federations more conservative. as long as the two hexbear instances stay federated, we're not splitting the userbase, and it gives people a way to get a reprieve when the sludge gets tiring.

      • happyandhappy [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea if we are like federating it'll be good to mayb put up like a warning that we just federated with Y and shit might be annoying for a couple weeks before bans and avoidance settle. So there's no confusion about what type of space we actually want to maintain and how we want to integrate w new users. Plus it could help to explain like what federation and etiquette etc is expected during the federation period cuz I have no idea what's going on typically

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn't see myself or anybody gaining traction with anybody there. Maybe we could've in time but it would've meant going back to square 1 and relitigating all the conversations we've had with libs on other instances. Plus I felt like there was a good chance of it provoking a backlash towards defederating more broadly.

      Generally I agree with you but in this case I didn't get the impression that any of them were gonna listen.

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        it would've meant going back to square 1 and relitigating all the conversations we've had with libs on other instances

        sankara-bass We can never stop explaining

        It is frustrating to have to have the same argument 10,000 times. But if we're going to get anywhere we need a whole lot more people on our side, which means talking to people and bringing them around.

        • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          We need proof of concept and to focus our efforts on people who are somewhat more receptive and who we've already been talking to. There's still a very long way to go with the libs we already have, no need to bite off more than we can chew.

    • 1nt3rd1m3nt10n4l [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      All we are doing is isolating ourselves from ideological participation, and thus leaving the npc libs that are otherwise amenable to hearing our side at the mercy of fascists without opposition.

      this

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don't know what original plan exists if we're only federated to one space that isn't socialist or socialist adjacent.

    • Egon
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I agree in theory it is impossible to make any headway when the mods are anti-communists who are actively banning good faith discussion because they are ideologically opposed.

      There will be plenty of users over there looking at the Modlog and asking "Why was that removed?" I think their heavy handed censorship will likely undo the whole instance over time.

    • batsforpeace [any, any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The last expansion added lemmygrad, some hobbyists, and a bunch of liberals. The results were mixed but we could live with that I guess. This one exposed us to something resembling old edgy 4chan/IRC style debaters, it's a different sort of user, I haven't seen that style in a long time. We should at least have a deeper look at the instances we want to federate with in the future.

      Gotta wonder though.. when there's trolling against trans people even from small alternative communities that are supposed to have more refined 'protest users' against reddit or other media, what's the state of the anglosphere internet in general? Also it's funny how it maps that the countries lemmyverse people dislike happen to be the countries the collective west is in a cold war with right now.

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah without federation hexbear probably dies. The past few months prior to federation were dire. So many pointless internal arguments and the amount of users and activity seemed to be dwindling. Getting back onto upstream Lemmy and some form of federation was desperately needed.