I really can't stand that liberal snobbery where racism, sexism, homophobia etc. is framed as being something stupid, poor, "unsuccessful" people do because they are sore losers looking for someone to blame for their own failures.
Rich "successful" people are also the same who will happily vote for the Kill The Poor and Deport All Brown People Party if they promise to reduce their property taxes. Reactionary social policies have always gone hand in hand with reactionary economic policies.
Libs can only ever conceive of the world as a contest between different factions of IQs because libs assert society is more or less finished developing. The only things remaining to do are perhaps media representation and more women as CEOs. Libs believe modern social ills such as racism, reactionary tendencies, and transphobia are permanent human qualities arising from I don't even know, genetic predisposition.
It's that damn End of History argument that libs like Fukuyama love so much, despite (or perhaps because of) how fundamentally non-materialist such a worldview and conception of history is.
I think i remember reading somewhere that Fukuyama himself actually admitted that he was wrong. But of course, the idea it self still lingers on.
Why do they assume that a plane full of people traveling midweek during a pandemic for a political rally are the poor and uneducated, not middle class/petit bourgeoisie?
They can afford to take off work, buy a plane ticket, probably a hotel room, and go to a political action in DC. These are not poor people.
the world is becoming more complex to the point people with low IQ can't keep up
Yes, the neoliberal means testing that forces disabled people to fill out pages of paperwork is passive genocide.
lmao libs love to pretend to be civil then they go full "On the Trump Supporter Question"
The idea that only unintelligent people do manual labour is fucking disgusting and classist as fuck.
As usual, the libs opposing our Nebraska
re-education campsHoliday edutainment resorts.