• RoseishBlue [she/her]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Sent this to a neocon I work with who's been arguing with me all week. I'll let y'all know how it goes.

  • congressbaseballfan [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    We should all go and bully that cunt at the top left Jesus Christ what a pissant

    Edit: god damn that tweet made me so mad. Almost as hard hitting as that xeni jardin tweet last week.

    • determinism [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Fucking economists.

      http://jenniferdoleac.com

      https://newsroom.iza.org/en/archive/research/the-moral-hazard-of-life-saving-innovations-naloxone-access-opioid-abuse-and-crime/

      The United States is grappling with an epidemic of opioid abuse and mortality. The U.S. Surgeon General recently called for everyone to carry naloxone — a drug that can save someone’s life if administered during an overdose. This call echoed similar advice by public health officials at the state and local levels. Over the past decade, states have gradually increased legal access to naloxone, which had previously required a prescription to obtain. The thinking is that if naloxone is in everyone’s medicine cabinet, then those suffering from opioid addiction will be more likely to survive an overdose. Surviving the overdose then allows them the opportunity to get treatment for their addiction.

      We worried that increasing access to naloxone may do more than just increase the chances of surviving an overdose. When an activity becomes less risky, people are more likely to engage in it. (Economists call this moral hazard.) For instance, researchers have found that people became more likely to engage in risky sex after HIV became more treatable. It could be that when an opioid overdose is more easily treatable by naloxone, people are more likely to engage in risky opioid use. The goal of our recent study is to quantify this effect. We feel that we have achieved that goal. But we also generated an unintended side effect of a tremendous degree of outrage and opposition to our hypothesis and our results. We will first describe our results, and then discuss the controversy that followed their release.

    • Zodiark
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • D61 [any]
    ·
    4 years ago

    The beautiful simplicity of the final panel is awe inspiring.

  • Lerios [hy/hym]
    ·
    4 years ago

    the third poster is the only valid poster o7