Not like me and my big brain that thinks Tibet will massively improve materially and socially by being thrown overnight into the hungry mouths of the big wolf called global capitalism.
I mean poverty is decreasing world wide so maybe it would be best for Tibet to go at it alone! I am sure I can find some great white male saviour Bill Gates tweet to support my thesis.
Not like me and my big brain that thinks Tibet will massively improve materially and socially by being thrown overnight into the hungry mouths of the big wolf called global capitalism.
Yes, those are definitely the only two options, the PRC certainly could not just set up a separate communist state with Tibetan leadership.
Big brain take: I trust China to setup overnight some separate independent socialist state but I don't trust China to actually govern the region like it has done for over 50 years now.
Please spend at least 2s thinking about the actual outcome here for the people involved in the struggle against imperialism.
2-China vows to support the socialist government at all costs.
3-Suddenly like nobody could ever see this coming a """"movement"""" starts crying for DEMOCRACY so now they ask big brother USA to help them because big bad China is literaly holding Tibet as a satellite state you know because the Tibetan people deserve DEMOCRACY or some shit.
Result: China gets balkanized but still has to support this territory for security and ideological reasons.
Sounds great to me we should ask the Tibetan people if they want independence right away...
Big brain take: I trust China to setup overnight some separate independent socialist state but I don’t trust China to actually govern the region like it has done for over 50 years now.
I don't trust it to do either, it's a bourgeois state and it'd set up a bourgeois state in this thought experiment. But it'd still be less of an imperialism.
Result: China gets balkanized but still has to support this territory for security and ideological reasons.
They don't have to do shit. They let Myanmar sink or swim, don't tell me they couldn't do the same for Tibet.
Conquering another country for "security reasons" is pure fucking imperialism, it's the same shitty reasoning used for the Japanese colonization of Korea and China. Not like it's even applicable here - it'd suicide to try an invade China through Tibet, the logistics are ridiculous.
Not like me and my big brain that thinks Tibet will massively improve materially and socially by being thrown overnight into the hungry mouths of the big wolf called global capitalism.
I mean poverty is decreasing world wide so maybe it would be best for Tibet to go at it alone! I am sure I can find some
great white male saviourBill Gates tweet to support my thesis.Yes, those are definitely the only two options, the PRC certainly could not just set up a separate communist state with Tibetan leadership.
Big brain take: I trust China to setup overnight some separate independent socialist state but I don't trust China to actually govern the region like it has done for over 50 years now.
Please spend at least 2s thinking about the actual outcome here for the people involved in the struggle against imperialism.
1-Tibet becomes socialist "independent" satellite.
2-China vows to support the socialist government at all costs.
3-Suddenly like nobody could ever see this coming a """"movement"""" starts crying for DEMOCRACY so now they ask big brother USA to help them because big bad China is literaly holding Tibet as a satellite state you know because the Tibetan people deserve DEMOCRACY or some shit.
Result: China gets balkanized but still has to support this territory for security and ideological reasons. Sounds great to me we should ask the Tibetan people if they want independence right away...
I don't trust it to do either, it's a bourgeois state and it'd set up a bourgeois state in this thought experiment. But it'd still be less of an imperialism.
They don't have to do shit. They let Myanmar sink or swim, don't tell me they couldn't do the same for Tibet.
Conquering another country for "security reasons" is pure fucking imperialism, it's the same shitty reasoning used for the Japanese colonization of Korea and China. Not like it's even applicable here - it'd suicide to try an invade China through Tibet, the logistics are ridiculous.
I don't trust it to do either