https://old.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/n69b6i/for_those_who_might_be_interested_nytimes_is/

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.

      He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

      For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.

      Manifesto

  • Rem [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Their overuse of "male" and "female" as nouns was kind of a giveaway.

  • 1111br2222 [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    it honestly would have really surprised me if they did manage to square trans acceptance with all the other shit going on in there

  • MeatfuckerDidNothing [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Cw: transphobia

    spoiler

    "Everyone has a sex, not everyone has a gender identity"

    TERFs understand basic gender theory challenge