Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Whitehouse.gov
fbi.gov
cia.gov
dhs.gov
ice.gov
lol this teacher is fast approaching yikes territory "what do you mean four of my students were radicalized into becoming white supremacists because i told them to go to white supremacist websites???"
real answer: daily stormer, stormfront. grey zone could be things like proud boy forums, parler, certain subreddits, america first, thedonald.lose
And what the fuck does review them based on accessibility and quality mean?
‘No epithets, just pure phrenology. Great for kids and family. ‘
‘The Racism is chef’s kiss so well put together on the front end’
"Great accessibility; has colorblind-friendly display options and proper tagging for text-to-speech readers. Quality is poor however; some of the content even includes Italians as whites!"
Yeah, I'm not sure about this, but its a big part of my grade. I'm like 98% sure it's well meaning, but I'm definitely going to bring this up. Actually, that's another good question. How should I bring up my concerns about this assignment?
it could also be tremendously triggering for students of color who are already subjected to a white supremacist society because it forces them to relive racism directed at them
Guess you could tell your teacher that students are not immune from propaganda, even looking at it through a scientific lens for research opens the door.
Write about how you think POC's, Jews or LGBT people would feel reading the material?
Took me too long to realize you weren't talking about thegrayzone.com.🤦♂️😅
This assignment seems pretty sus, but you should definitely include ice.gov
That seems like a very bad idea that you shouldn't be assigned to do. Should Jewish and POC students really have to do this for a grade? How do you asses "accessibility and quality" of something like this and how is it useful to do so in any way? What is the goal here?
Just look at the posts about South Africa on the default subs and cite all the people saying the "black rapist ANC supporters" need to "go back to the jungle" and were "kept tame by the apartheid government"
Example (CW obviously)
My favorite part:
I mention as a disclaimer that I am white, middle class, and vehemently opposed to the ANC, while being supportive of Ramaphosa as president - I don't like his party, but I think he is doing an incredible job in a difficult time.
Tbh this is just as likely to attract a bunch of angry chuds as it's likely to attract legitimate concern and scrutiny. I wouldn't go for this as a first move at least.
Bring it up with an educational union affiliated with the school then
Yo real answer though: https://itsgoingdown.org/category/columns/this-week-in-fascism/ you can probably find a mountain of fascist brain-worms by following some of the shit IGD manages to dig up on these fools. It is incredibly important to not take fascists at face-value, especially when they know they are talking to a wider audience. They always operate in bad-faith, they will always mislead and lie. Be cautious about who they think they are addressing when looking at this stuff--lest you fall into the 'wtf tucker carlson made a good point' trap.
Be a smart ass, just pick the first 10 websites from a google search for "websites".
There are white supremacist websites that I wouldn’t touch outside of a virtual machine and through a VPN. I’m guessing your professor has not primed your classmates in rudimentary opsec for cyber security research. Another potential concern if you do bring that up.
your teacher is a wigger nationalist faking plausible deniability
find other students (esp POC) and bring it to the attention of the dean
Okay here we go:
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Belongs at the bottom of a mineshaft
-
Site 1:
Accessibility: Bad. People are able to access it and say/read white supremacist garbage.
Quality: Bad. It's a fucking white supremacist website ffs!
Submit that, times 10. If the professor gives you a bad grade, take it to the dean.
(Optionally: Give web address for professor's personal web page as one of the sites.)
If you want something less subtle than what's already been suggested, check out the Mises Institute. It's an ancap think tank whose founder has ties to the Brotherhood of the South which is exactly the type of group you'd expect. Actually do their website too, they have a Chinese language section for some odd reason.
reddit
instagram
facebook
cnn.com
msnbc.com
bbc.com
ned.org
adl.org
wsj.com
bloomberg.com
I think I might get kicked from the class if I call the ADL white supremacist.
