Wikipedia: For the People Act
The For the People Act HAS TO PASS because voting rights are under attack. For that reason, I’ll support it. But let’s be clear about the flimflam the Senate Dems behind this watered down just pulled. They took out ALL of HR1’s ethics provisions. EVERY LAST ONE!
Here are SOME of the provisions they felt were dealbreakers and had to be removed. These are provisions that the House of Representatives passed. But the Senate? No, this was a bridge too far for these Senators. Somebody should ask them why!
EVERY LAST ONE OF THESE IS NOW GONE!
require POTUS/VPOTUS + CANDIDATES for POTUS/VPOTUS to disclose 10 years of tax returns
require the Supreme Court to FINALLY adopt an ethics code
void federal contracts with POTUS/VPOTUS & impose penalties for holding such contracts
bar spending federal funds on a business owned by POTUS/VPOTUS, cabinet officials or their spouses/children
authorize Office of Govt Ethics to conduct investigations & issue subpoenas, which can be enforced by a district court
authorize OGE to impose disciplinary action
authorize OGE to require agencies to seek OGE’s approval when resolving conflicts of interest, issuing waivers, or handling other ethics matters
require OGE to create a public online database for any records it approves
require agency ethics officials to provide OGE with a broad array of ethics records and require OGE to post them online
make POTUS/VPOTUS either divest conflicting financial interests or engage in disclose information about the businesses they own
require a presidential appointee to recuse from any particular matter involving a party who is: the POTUS who appointed him/her, the spouse or child of that POTUS, or an entity in which any of these individuals has a substantial interest
clarify that POTUS/VPOTUS must file an annual financial disclosure report in their first year in office
impose limits on nepotists who try to skirt the anti-nepotism law by foregoing a salary
bar top officials for two years from working on any “particular matter” in which the official “knows or reasonably should know” a former employer or former client has a financial interest
extend a 1-year restriction on senior employees trying to influence their former agencies to 2 years after leaving govt
close a loophole that lets outside sources skirt a law against supplementing an appointee's salary by timing a payment before they start in govt
expand a ban on procurement officers involved in contracts worth >$10M from going to work for contractors they oversaw for 1 year by (a) extending it to 2 years + (b) also applying it to subcontractors, attorneys, lobbyists and consultants of the contractors
ban former contractor employees who come into government from awarding federal contracts to their former employers for two years
set requirements, limits and procedures for establishing legal defense funds to pay the legal bills of executive branch officials
require OGE to post ethics waivers on its website
reauthorize the existence of the Office of Government Ethics, which lapsed in 2007
authorize OGE’s director to carry over in the position for up to a year after the 5-year term ends if a replacement hasn't been confirmed/13
authorizes OGE to communicate directly with Congress to sound the alarm about ethics problems without having to obtain permission from OMB or the White House.
eliminate the requirement that OGE must consult with OPM before submitting new draft ethics rules to OMB
require ethics officials to get training
bar use of federal funds for unauthorized travel on govt aircraft
require DoD to report to Congress on the cost of presidential travel.
require DoD to report to Congress on the cost to DoD of other senior officials’ travel
require disclosures from presidential transition team members
bar political appointees from accepting gifts from lobbyists
require political appointees to recuse from particular matters involving a former client or employee as a party or representative for 2 years
bar lobbyists from working for agencies they lobbied in the last two years and bars them from working on the “specific issues” on which they lobbied at other agencies
bar departing officials from lobbying other political appointees for the remainder of the administration
bar senior officials from taking chartered flights.
require members of Congress to reimburse the Treasury for amounts paid as settlements and awards under in all cases of sexual harassment
bar members of Congress serving on boards of for-profit entities
require the public posting of all reports by agencies that Congress mandated
require DOJ to maintain a strong Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) investigation unit (and provide funding)
impose a $10,000 fine for failure to register as a foreign agent, $1,000 for failing to file supplemental registrations, bar foreign principal from paying the fine
require FARA registrants to disclose anything of value given by their principal to a federal official
require DOJ to make FARA filings available online in digitized format.
require foreign agents to disclose when online postings come from their foreign principals
require online platforms to remove noncompliant FARA material when notified by the government
clarify that the FARA rules apply whether the agent is acting inside or outside the U.S.
require the Attorney General to report to Congress on legal, policy, and procedural challenges to FARA enforcement
bars lobbying for countries designated by POTUS as engaged in gross human rights violations
require lobbyists to disclose their status as lobbyists at the time they make lobbying contacts and to specify if their clients are foreign entities
require DOJ database for the public to access lobbyist and foreign agent filings
.... and more!!
So, please, tell us @Sen_JoeManchin, what was so terrible about these ethics provisions that you couldn't live with them? We're all ears!
-
Manchin is the public face of a larger group of conservative democrats (but I repeat myself), none of whom like ethics stuff
-
sure glad the libs voted to end fascism right?
-
they could literally just call him out for all the corporate cash he rakes in. make ads about it, talk about it constantly, get msnbc to attack him for it, etc... and destroy him. but they won't because they don't care.
what would be the difference honestly? if they don't enforce discipline on assholes like him, they can never get anything done.
:data-laughing: :you-think-this-is-funny: :youre-laughing: :youre-awful: :youre-welcome:
Lol they let mcconell steal a Supreme Court seat from them already, and couldn’t/can’t convince the dying liberal judges to step down and be replaced by a dem because the judges are so narcissistic and selfish, just like the rest of the disgusting liberal establishment hogs.
They could literally just kick him out, cut funding, make his life hell but of course, it's a pointless exercise since they actually want him to do this shit.
The dems could probably run a literal communist, or at least a militant leader from the UMWA, and get them elected over Manchin...but that wouldn't be the kind of politics a very serious person engages in.
They used to just threaten to cut whatever state the disobedient senator was from out of spending bills and then pull the party's support for any reelection campaigns. All these people want to maintain their seat at the table above all else so it wasn't even that hard.
Short answer
Biden (etc) could simply play dirty and a dem for once in history could punch not to the left.
Longer answer
Manchin surely has any number of skeletons in his closet. Biden could have sent up a secret war room to find out what they are the very day he was declared the 2020 winner. And he could have done that a dozen or so other troublesome dems. If they found dirt - they could use it.
If not...
Biden could photoshop some pics of him diddling kids or something.
Yeah, they could simply manufacture some. Biden's got shitloads of power. Not that he'd ever use it that way.
So I skimmed this list but it seems like Joe Machin refused to allow what amounts to platitudes that don't actually change much to pass.
Which is pretty funny ngl. Can't even allow platitudes.
They never got Trump's tax returns! And they can't even require future presidents to release them! This is so fucking funny.
We need to elect more democrats to override Manchin so we can...checks notes....ban senior officials from riding on charter planes.
Blue 2024
The Democrats gutted the bill and Joe Manchin was happy to play the villain. They'll find someone else when you primary him.
There was a primary challenger a few years ago. She seemed pretty cool and particularly concerned with climate change, but she naturally got crushed.
The Democrats gutted the bill
The Democrats wrote the bill. Fucking insane. Zero party discipline.
There are two things I give a shit about when it comes to democracy reform:
- Ending partisan gerrymandering
- Statehood for Washington DC
Anything else is basically platitudes compared to the above two. Fighting voter suppression would be nice too but eliminating gerrymandering is at least 10 times more important.
None of this matters, of course, because even this compromise (which tbh is still pretty good because it fixes gerrymandering) will not pass a filibuster.
Gerrymandering in the states and in the House of Representatives gets a lot of attention due to the patent absurdity of the maps, but even with the best data and the best models, it holds no candle to the gerrymandering of the Senate through permanent state borders. The equal representation of states in the Senate makes it so if the 26 lowest population states vote in a bloc, 17% of the US population has the potential to hold veto power over all legislation, as well as the ability to rubber stamp/veto anybody entering the judiciary.
Democracy reform is a great thing to talk to libs about. It lets you lean fully into the liberal reformist ideals and carry them to the inevitable conclusion that the only solution is to vaporize the Constitution.
The senate is the most evil and broken part of our shit ass system. Well maybe the Supreme Court. Nah the Senate if for no other reason than the fact that the Senate chooses the Supreme Court.