For me, shitty style / lazy writing make me put a book down immediately. I was raised on the worship of style you find in writers like Flaubert or Nabokov (who also happened to have deplorable political views) and I can’t shake it.

Others commented here recently that making every female character in a story into a sex object is a bad thing.

What are some reasons you’ll put a book down after you’ve spent at least a little time giving it a try?

  • CyberMao [it/its]
    ·
    3 years ago

    The internet has ruined my attention span and I can only finish a book that I’m nearly addicted to

    • The_Walkening [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Q: How many male novelists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

      A: He straightened his tie. He had lost, but in a romantic way, which meant that he had won. “I’m going to do a pushup,” he announced to his tie. His tie respected him for it, and secretly wished that it could have sex with him.

      :lt-dbyf-dubois:

    • duderium [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      There’s a lot of incest too. Then also I don’t know if it’s a Spanish thing because I’m maybe not even an intermediate but when be writes “mujer” it’s translated into English as “wife” even though I think “mujer” just means woman?

      The site you posted seems to be making fun of Cormac McCarthy. He writes muscular prose which means long sentences connected by like twenty ands.

  • replaceable [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Power fantasies, i hate them, i feel like the story is inevitably going to be boring since esentially there is no conflict, alas i encounter them a lot since i read a lot of fanficition.

    Also harems, its probably theoreticaly possible that this kind of relationship would be handled well in the story but i refuse to read them on principle

      • replaceable [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I have only read a couple of light novels, my experience with these tropes mainly comes from reading manga or fanfiction.

        The slanted power dynamic thing does explain why i hate harems as when i read romance novels i avoid ones with uneven power dynamics like for example one of the main characters being a billionaire.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          deleted by creator

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • kingspooky [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don't often just put down a novel and give up reading it. But last time I did it was the inherently sexist, gender-essentialist nature of the magic system baked into the entire setting that did it for me.

      • kingspooky [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        The Eye of the World. For the life of me I will never understand why Wheel of Time is so popular with other people who like fantasy novels.

        • Alex_Jones [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          I couldn't stand the first book either and knew it was what you were referring to. I couldn't get into it at all and only later did I read up on the gender-based magic system.

        • KollontaiWasRight [she/her,they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          One second, I'm gonna have to cross my arms under my breasts and tug on my ponytail to indicate that I am upset.

          Okay, got that out of the way, although somehow one of my arms has become three feet long and completely bendy in order to accomplish it.

          Had Robert Jordan just never met a woman? It's painfully bad.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          deleted by creator

        • BeamBrain [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Understandable. The weird gender stuff prevented me from getting into it at all. That and the guy who introduced me to it ended up being a vaguely tradfash weirdo with plenty of his own gender brainworms.

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • Fartbutt420 [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    If your book is a surface-level dive into the seedy underbelly of the American suburban middle-class family, I am not interested in your book. (See: Jonathan Franzen, Celeste Ng, John Irving)

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • karl3422 [none/use name]
        ·
        3 years ago

        write what you know is why there are so many books about english professors considering having an affair

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          deleted by creator

  • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    old-timey prose. especially 18th century, fucking kills my brain to read, even when im interested in the topic/plot, whatever

    Dangerous Liasons is a interesting story and good movie but reading the book... HELLISH

    Robespierre, awesome dude, great quotes, but unedited? Nonononono

    • SaniFlush [any, any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      if their sentence has more than two semicolons they need to slow the fuck down

    • AnalGettysburg [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      You should open up Mason & Dixon next time you’re in a library or bookstore. The dedication to the bit is just astounding

      • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
        ·
        3 years ago

        im the kind of sicko who might extremely dig that. as much as i hate the genuine article i've wrote more than one enlightenment style parody essays :agony-soviet:

  • KollontaiWasRight [she/her,they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Not gonna differentiate between amateur writing and professional writing here, since I tear through hundreds of pages of fiction a week when I have free time, which makes remembering what something is from a pain. It also means I read a lot of crap. Generally, I put something down for one of the following reasons:

    1. Obnoxious reactionary politics. Someone starts pushing fash shit, I put the book down. Sadly, more common than I'd like.
    2. Major grammatical shortcomings. Not a typo or two, those are fine. Consistent poor use of punctuation, tenses, or anything that consistently distracts me from actually reading.
    3. Grinding misery. I can deal with hard things happen to a character, but if the whole story is just misery after misery, I'm not gonna put up with it forever. Example: Name of the Wind. Just, constant grinding misery and it almost always the MC's fault in the microcosm. It's a fine introduction to why poverty is self-reinforcing (everything that can fuck you over will fuck you over, and all of your available decisions are variations on bad ones), but it is also miserable to read.
    4. Certain kinds of being too real. I struggle to read some trans-centering literature explicitly because it either makes me feel incredibly dysphoric or because it just re-triggers my own sore points. This can be hard to predict ahead of time with a text. I experience this most often in the context of fanfiction.
    5. Tension without release. One of the trends I see in fanfiction over 200k words is a tendency to not be able to allow pressure off of the story for a little while before bringing it back. Arcs are either not fully resolved, leaving no downtime to the story or the author can't help but continue escalating. This is a bit like grinding misery, but not the same. I find it exhausting. If I wanted to deal with an unending grind where things never get better, I'd go outside.
    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • Alex_Jones [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I'm very particular about description. If they use racist tropes like food analogies or only focus on describing non-white people, I'm going to notice.

    I also hate it when authors use shorthand. Don't just call it a starship and then leave it at that.

  • Speaker [e/em/eir]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Any detective novel written by a comedian or politician who thinks they're funny. I only made this mistake once in reading some dross Hugh Laurie wrote. They all want to be P.G. Wodehouse but seem to forget that Wodehouse is humor strictly for the worst sort of self-sucking nerd, and isn't actually that funny at all if you were born after 1970 or unless you like a very specific kind of camp.

  • BeamBrain [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    These are things I mostly see in fanfiction and their prevalence is a large part of why I rarely read fanfic anymore, but:

    • Poorly understood and badly applied historical/scientific concepts, especially evopsych
    • Characters acting as blatant strawmen for people/positions the author doesn't like
    • Protagonists who effortlessly pulverize all challenges laid before them
    • When the story enters the author's magical realm
    • Using atrocities like rape and slavery in a tone-deaf and shallow manner for cheap shock value
    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • keepcarrot [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        So many of my friends at the sci-fi club liked that back in the day. smh

      • FidelCashflow [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I maintian hp:mor is good. The slaver and rape stuff was from the original. It is otherswise a quest to overthrow the bourgeois and give everyone universal healthcare.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • FidelCashflow [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            You are correct in both that it is at this point tedious to examine, and that isn't what yud ment to write. It is entirely luck and his lack of foresight that allowed thst work to be any good at all. If he possed the skill to write what he wanted it would have been garbage. I think he still has me blocked on Facebook for calling hpjev a maoist

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              deleted by creator

              • FidelCashflow [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                I will die on the hill that he is a weiner and objectively wrong about his own work. It accidentally has good stuff in it because he copied from better writers and didn't file the serial numbers off.

                All the miri stuff is seperate and painfully childish. Just straight brainworms and sophistry As he blocked me from the sub-reddit for reminding him. Capitalism is the ultimate paperclip maximizer.

                • UlyssesT
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 days ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • FidelCashflow [he/him]
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    I have a very specific and parasocial beef with the guy. Probably the biggest part of my being able to imagine a better world and become a filthy commie was through rationalism. I tried to get a less wrong meetup going, emailed him a bit, visited other groups. It was what allowed me to imagine a better world was possible after obama broke my faith in the dnc. It was the specific failure of that group to be less wrong that primed me for chapo and bernie. I still have specific enmity for them starting a fucking cult dedicated to logic and consistently being irrationally credulous fools.

                    • UlyssesT
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      11 days ago

                      deleted by creator

                  • BeamBrain [he/him]
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    He's one of those "too smart for school" types, which I used to think I was back in high school. Then I went to college and had to overcome serious academic challenges for the first time, and I realized just how limited that knowledge was. He dropped out of high school and never went to college, so he never had that sort of humbling experience. Instead he, as you say, gets his ego inflated by billionaires because he tells them what they want to hear.

        • BeamBrain [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          The slaver and rape stuff was from the original.

          This definitely wasn't in the original:

          CW: Rape, racism

          Draco snarled. "She has some sort of perverse obsession about the Malfoys, too, and her father is politically opposed to us so he prints every word. As soon as I'm old enough I'm going to rape her."

          There had been ten thousand societies over the history of the world where this conversation could have taken place. Even in Muggle-land it was probably still happening, somewhere in Saudi Arabia or the darkness of the Congo. It happened in every place and time that didn’t descend directly from the Enlightenment.

  • poppy_apocalypse [he/him, any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Starting with backstory. "Joe Doritos parents worked in the mines, his grandfather was a fisherman and his grandmother washed clothes. Before them, his relatives were farmers..."

    • anaesidemus [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      you'd love the Sagas lol, every character starts with a detailed description of ancestry and reason for nickname.