Do liberals ever stop for a second and ask themselves why they keep ending up on the same side as the Nazis?
Unfortunately, it's the liberalism that keeps them from asking these questions.
Liberals dislike nazis because they're rude folks who make them feels uncomfortable. Meanwhile, liberals HATE leftists because we're an existential threat to their very way of life.
if leftists did this to a Mein Kampf reading the cops would have been there in 90 seconds teargassing them while the NYT wrung its hands about political expression
fortunately officers were already at the scene as they had taken an interest in the organisation and were able to apprehend these dangerous antifa terrorists.
They can't even say "fascists." "Demonstrations by anti-Antifa groups..."
It will be utterly meaningless but I will still enjoy thanking the libs for getting us all killed with this horseshit.
I have a friend who got mad at me when I called these guys Nazis. He was like, "They aren't 1940s German soldiers committing atrocities against Jewish people, and you pretending they are is honestly insulting af."
I had to stop the conversation, because you just can't reason with that.
They're only nazis if they come from the Bavarian region of Germany, otherwise they're just sparkling nationalists!!
They aren’t 1940s German soldiers committing atrocities against Jewish people
Neither was Hitler.
We're entering "How dare you call the Pope Catholic!" levels of cynical denial.
Carrying? That’s too much agency :meow-knit: in the presence of the flag containing swastika, which was witnessed nearby
People in the replies literally "both sides"-ing this.
Shit like "why people would want to cosplay as Stalin and Hilter in 2022 is beyond me"
Politics in American thought is the same as picking a sports team.
Good point. Or they could have been Native Americans. Or Indians (from India). Or...
the ideology of the people interrupting
How could we ever possibly know? They weren't reading books.
Oh just some "people" carrying a swastika and shouting slurs
What a mysterious "group of people" whose affiliations shall remain unknown forever
A convo on the phone between an editor and the on-the-scene reporter.
Editor "You used the word 'Nazis'. Why?"
The reporter knows where this is going but she stands her ground anyway "They were carrying a Nazi flag. And yelling racist statements."
"Wel..." The editor needlessly adjusts his glasses to show moral superiority even though the reporter can't even see him "Did you hear them say 'We are Nazis.'?"
The reporter could 'hear' the glasses thing through the phone but she soldiers on anyway. "I did not but—"
"Then you can't call them 'Nazis'."
"What noun do I use?"
"Clearly 'a group of people'. And then use what you said - 'They were carrying a flag with a swastika. And shouting racial slurs.'"
Hitler gets into power and that editor is like "noted public speaker graciously accepts position as chancellor"
Oh ok, it's just some post-Weimar enthusiasts. Nbd.
spoiler
:pit: :fash-bash: :nazi-punching:
Wait till a call is made to officers who arrive to kinetically ascertain the situation.
Well uh I'm a bit surprised this got into the news actually. And of course, NYT remains shit.
Going ultra passive voice for fascism. Hitler was involved with a swastica related, death incident, involving large amounts of Jewish dead. Fighting occurred with Soviet forces, due to their opposition to policies, symbolized by the swastica.
its like the media is literally trying to turn me into howard beale
They're getting another war and it could become a very big one. They must be so excited.
passive voice. You know in Chinese there's a specific word that indicates the sentence is in passive voice
