And then we never heard from them again? The Dems were like, "oh no, blame that damn Parliamentarian who you've definitely heard of before, and who has a totally legit position that overpowers everyone, especially Harris and Biden." That was great.

  • footfaults [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The parliamentarian is also someone who the Senate can unilaterally fire.

    Republicans did it when the parliamentarian got in their way

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/05/08/key-senate-official-loses-job-in-dispute-with-gop/e2310021-0f14-4667-a261-54e6c033207c/

    Dove angered Republicans, especially Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), with at least two recent rulings that effectively made it harder for the GOP to push President Bush's budget and tax cut proposals through the evenly divided body.

  • spectre [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can someone give a minimally snarky ELI5 of that whole thing?

      • spectre [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        What is the historical reason for the parliamentarian to exist?

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          guessing the same reason it exists today, to eliminate things that are popular so that elected officials dont have to take that popularity hit

            • KoeRhee [he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Congressional shit is uselessly byzantine and complicated so rather than the rotating cast of goons being counted on to know all the rules they just have a designated guy or gal who does all that stuff for them.

  • posadist_shark [love/loves]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Its, really interesting from a historical perspective how much social malpractice has to build up in this system before it starts to implode.

  • star_wraith [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I thought it was Sinema who killed that one, not the parliamentarian.

  • Ziege_Bock [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Even better, do you recall how the Senate passed Permanent Day Light Savings?

    In a totally allowed for procedure, the Chair let Marco Rubio ask for consent to pass the resolution via unanimous consent, and no one was really coordinated enough to notice that no one was designated to vote it down. So it passed the Senate. Why can't we just try wacky shit like that?

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wacky gimmicks only work on wacky gimmick issues like DST. Capital doesn’t really care one way or the other on that issue

    • FugaziArchivist [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      I support increasing the congressional wackiness levels by some 60-70%. Zaniness, even

  • CanYouFeelItMrKrabs [any, he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The parliamentarian only matters when doing budget reconciliation bills. Which does not happen that often. And can happen at most once per year.

    • DivineChaos100 [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The neoliberalism gnome coming once every year, taking away your wage increases and replacing them with austerity measures and means tests, be sure to leave out some crude oil and gold for him before you go to sleep

    • posadist_shark [love/loves]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Would it be possible to rule lawyer your self into non existence? I guess we about to find out :centrist:

  • adultswim_antifa [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The parliamentarian was just a stenographer that started doing clerk shit in the 20s and they made his position official in the 30s. He retired in the 60s. And that's why we can't have a higher minimum wage.