Permanently Deleted

  • Dolores [love/loves]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    no, they can't. racism is an ideological framework they process literally everything through. even stuff seemingly unrelated, you put a hardcore racist in a math class and subsequently tell them the math they're learning was made by a black person it'll bother them

    as an aside white people have by far the most neanderthal dna so if you're into white people that's a, actual neanderthal fetish :debate-me-debate-me: i mean look at ron perlman yo

    • ssjmarx [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Whenever I've seen neanderthals used by racists it's by people using their DNA as a justification for European superiority. The idea is that they were the original white people, and they got out-bred by Homo Sapiens, in a prehistoric version of white replacement.

      • Dolores [love/loves]
        ·
        2 years ago

        i had no idea ron perlman was jewish, he played a neanderthal in a quest for fire lol

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          idk how Quest For Fire ever got made. "Let's make a movie based on at this time up to date archeology and anthropology on ancient humans about three dudes going on a road trip to borrow a lighter."

          Supposedly the scene where the guy taught them how to use a bow-drill firestarter took hours to film because some times it just takes hours to get a bow drill going properly, even if you're good at it.

            • Frank [he/him, he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              My understanding is that it was considered pretty good for the time it was made, but science marches on.

              And yeah, various content warnings, definitely read a summary before you watch it.

          • Dolores [love/loves]
            ·
            2 years ago

            no way archaeologists thought cavepeople kept perpetual fires going & didn't know how to light stuff themselves, did they? i thought that part was so ridiculous

            also the sex stuff was icky

            • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              For a while, yeah.fire was probably discovered as being useful before we knew how to start one. We probably figured out how to move and maintain a fire before learning to start one from scratch.

              • Frank [he/him, he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yar. It's kind of hard to imagine someone figuring out a bow-drill before they figured out "I can just grab a burning stick from this wild fire and keep the coals alive indefinitely".

                But who knows? It's all speculation, maybe they did. You rub things together, they get warm, fire is warm, people are smart. Anything is possible.

        • electerrific [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Is that the one where the female lead gets raped over and over? Might want to put a content warning and spoiler tag on that.

  • RION [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I'm tired of high schoolers being played by smokeshows nearly twice the age of their character. Give me fricked up uncanny child-looking trash heaps with body proportions ravaged by puberty. Aka what 95% of people look like in college high school

    I guess at that point you can't have them :awooga: then which is a deal breaker for HBO and the like

      • Ligma_Male [comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        having mid 20s adults playing highschool kids reinforces :libertarian-approaching: ideas

        • Dolores [love/loves]
          ·
          2 years ago

          no it doesn't. there is nothing inherent to telling a story about younger people with older actors that necessarily sexualises or justifies sexualisation.

          some films certainly sexualize highschoolers and employ older performers to do that---the problem there is the work sexualizing them. no one decreed high school stories have to do that.

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            deleted by creator

            • Dolores [love/loves]
              ·
              2 years ago

              if that's the case i prefer adults be put in the producer-mandated sexualization over teens then

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          deleted by creator

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Idk if it's a real trend or just bias but it seems like there are a lot fewer normal looking people in shows and movies now.

      • Ericthescruffy [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Maybe? I keep going back and forth in my head. I'm pretty sure that beautiful people have always dominated the screen overall. Even the awkward "nerdy" characters in most of the shows I can think of from years back were all just gorgeous humans in semi unflattering clothes and makeup (if even that).

        Edit: Like take Alyson Hannigan as an example. She was always a smokeshow but she was also like the go to "awkward girl next door" actress.

    • egg1916 [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Derry Girls does a fantastic job of this. All the actors are late 20s/early 30s but they did great work with the costumes and makeup. It actually feels like a high school

      Most importantly, I think, is that the characters are awkward as fuck, dumbass teenagers. You know who else was an awkward as fuck, dumbass teenager? Everyone!

      • RION [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Reminds me of PEN15, the main characters are adults acting as tweens surrounded by actual tweens but apart from wardrobe and mannerisms they don't try to hide it. Wraps back around to being endearing

  • doublepepperoni [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    roflmao at the choice of photos, very fair

    Here is person A passed out drunk at a concert venue bathroom covered in the kebab they threw up

    Here is a glamour shot of person B with movie lighting, makeup and costuming

    Conclusion: PERSON A IS A FUCKIN UGGO

    • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      These are the kind of people so estranged from make up, lighting, and angles that they might not have noticed the two photos. Like they really, really wanted to highlight the different noses. The same way there's only going to be one whiteness until one person is left holding a gun to the other, the way they determine it will have to be standardized "no makeup, overhead lighting, naked, fox only, no items, final destination, front+side profile."

    • ProfessorAdonisCnut [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Some of the racists definitely went down the path of "actually the neanterthals had bigger brains they were basically the aryans brought down by judeo-sapiens race mixing schemes, the lower neanderthal stock is why the non-european haplogroups are inferior"

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • mkultrawide [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    No way, Sydney Sweeney looks the most "a bit bonked on the head" of the two, and I mean that as a complement.

  • Phish [he/him, any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Obviously extremely wrong and extremely racist, but also kink-shaming people with neanderthal fetishes

    • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, any judgement of their attractiveness aside (in which there is must humor in absurdity to be found) is there some moral imperative to not like neanderthals? It's like that picture of the monk praying as two women shake their asses at him.

      • booty [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        the virgin anti-neanderthal racist vs the chad neanderthal pursuer

      • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Just based off of the picture on the left I assumed it was some post apocalyptic show and she's a tribal priestess.

          • MaoistLandlord [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Sure but that’s all they do. Coke, weed, sex, party, fight, abuse. Then the next day they show up to class just fine, apparently with homework done because they never get an earful from the teachers or principals about academic probation, not that you’ll see them doing any school work

      • mittens [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        My sister watches this show non-ironically, in between bouts of rewatching gossip girl and gilmore girls.

    • Dolores [love/loves]
      ·
      2 years ago

      so like, it’s Skins?

      :deeper-sadness: yeah its american skins

        • Dolores [love/loves]
          ·
          2 years ago

          :scared: wait theres actual american skins i was just agreeing with the premise :hillary-disgust:

          fwiw euphoria has higher production value and is subjectively a bit better than og skins imo but its the same vibe/genre

    • MaoistLandlord [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s dumb as shit. There’s like a whole arc where this high school girl - again, played by an adult - becomes a cam girl on pornhub (registered trademark) and starts financially dominating random fat guys with small dicks

      All they do is smoke weed, have sex, charge they iPhones, be bisexual, and eat hot chip and lie

      I’m not gonna say “rich people don’t have drug addiction and trauma,” but it just so happens that every single fucking one of them is fucked up somehow and the only “normal” characters are considered boring