“ To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.”
This isn’t just some random “leftist”, this is a podcast host that is completely misleading people who are interested in communism about a literal 101 topic.
Understanding unemployment as a problem of capitalism and a tool for disciplining the working class doesn't have to do with Stalin and is basic Marxism. The whole political project is to liberate human labor from exploitation and alienation so it can fulfill our lives and improve the world.
This is the correct take. People's IRL contributions are much more important than whatever silly shit they say on twitter. Terminally online leftists (all of us on this website) need to grow up, log the fuck off and go do something real. But that's hard, so I guess we'll just keep anonymously criticizing strangers online and bickering with each other over ideological differences that no one normal cares about. For fucks sake, it's almost like COINTELPRO has become self-sustaining - leftists are so good at splintering their own movements by infighting that the FBI can just sit back with some popcorn and watch the show. But hey, I'm sure if we call enough people libs then communism will win, good job everyone.
I think it's counterproductive to demand that people swear fealty to a dead soviet leader before considering them a potential comrade. Do you do this litmus test with your real-life friends? Like, do you really refuse to hang out with or organize with people who aren't stalin fans? Or is this more a test for deciding which leftist podcasters/online figures are "good" and which ones are "bad"? Neither makes sense to me, but I'm curious
I do make notes about what people are saying and whether I can consider them trustworthy on the tasks that information can be applied to.
Are you a secret agent or something? I prefer to build trust with people the regular human way, by getting to know them over a period of time, assessing whether or not they share my general goals and principles and seeing if they live up to their commitments. Whether or not they agree with my interpretation of the legacies of controversial historical figures seems less important to me. I also think that there are valid criticisms of Stalin and the U.S.S.R. generally that aren't based on lies and propaganda, so I wouldn't rush to assume that anyone engaging in that criticism lacks critical thinking skills or the ability to interpret information.
You're just doing tedious strawman stuff now and you know it. I'm gonna stop now before I commit the cardinal sin of getting mad at an internet stranger over something pointless and stupid. Have a good one.
She's been on the ground participating in the Cop City protests so I'm not talking shit about her.
“ To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.”
This isn’t just some random “leftist”, this is a podcast host that is completely misleading people who are interested in communism about a literal 101 topic.
lmao
New tagline for the site.
Getting pilled on Stalin is at least 200 level.
lmao this isn’t even about Stalin, this is about how work is organized in a worker’s state.
Understanding unemployment as a problem of capitalism and a tool for disciplining the working class doesn't have to do with Stalin and is basic Marxism. The whole political project is to liberate human labor from exploitation and alienation so it can fulfill our lives and improve the world.
This is the correct take. People's IRL contributions are much more important than whatever silly shit they say on twitter. Terminally online leftists (all of us on this website) need to grow up, log the fuck off and go do something real. But that's hard, so I guess we'll just keep anonymously criticizing strangers online and bickering with each other over ideological differences that no one normal cares about. For fucks sake, it's almost like COINTELPRO has become self-sustaining - leftists are so good at splintering their own movements by infighting that the FBI can just sit back with some popcorn and watch the show. But hey, I'm sure if we call enough people libs then communism will win, good job everyone.
deleted by creator
I think it's counterproductive to demand that people swear fealty to a dead soviet leader before considering them a potential comrade. Do you do this litmus test with your real-life friends? Like, do you really refuse to hang out with or organize with people who aren't stalin fans? Or is this more a test for deciding which leftist podcasters/online figures are "good" and which ones are "bad"? Neither makes sense to me, but I'm curious
yes
:chad-stalin:
Sounds like a good way to make sure you're surrounded by insufferable nerds
Thanks I guess
Still a W in my book.
deleted by creator
Are you a secret agent or something? I prefer to build trust with people the regular human way, by getting to know them over a period of time, assessing whether or not they share my general goals and principles and seeing if they live up to their commitments. Whether or not they agree with my interpretation of the legacies of controversial historical figures seems less important to me. I also think that there are valid criticisms of Stalin and the U.S.S.R. generally that aren't based on lies and propaganda, so I wouldn't rush to assume that anyone engaging in that criticism lacks critical thinking skills or the ability to interpret information.
deleted by creator
You're just doing tedious strawman stuff now and you know it. I'm gonna stop now before I commit the cardinal sin of getting mad at an internet stranger over something pointless and stupid. Have a good one.
deleted by creator
Don't forget though