Lol what kind of math did you learn to come to that conclusion?
Soviet counter attack was settler colonialism is the dumbest take ive seen since the last one
To paraphrase
This is the stupidest take in world history, a record that will be broken by every subsequent day in world history.
Ive seen it a few times but adding the white genocide twist to it is something I haven't sent in ages
Stalin was a non white central asian settler in Europe who slaughtered millions of white Europeans
Pure projection in an attempt to cover up what the Germans were planning on doing
Stalin was considered non-white in his day, Georgians were called "black" and "swarthy" and "asiatic"
For reference of the opinions of the times, Trotsky said this:
THE late Leonid Krassin, old revolutionist, eminent engineer, brilliant Soviet diplomat and, above all, intelligent human being, was the first, if I am not mistaken, to call Stalin an “Asiatic”. In saying that, he had in mind no problematical racial attributes, but rather that blending of grit, shrewdness, craftiness and cruelty which has been considered characteristic of the statesmen of Asia. Bukharin subsequently simplified the appellation, calling Stalin “Genghis Khan,” manifestly in order to draw attention to his cruelty, which has developed into brutality. Stalin himself, in conversation with a Japanese journalist, once called himself an “Asiatic,” not in the old but rather in the new sense of the word: with that personal allusion he wished to hint at the existence of common interests between the U.S.S.R. and Japan as against the imperialistic West. Contemplating the term “Asiatic” from a scientific point of view, we must admit that in this instance it is but partially correct. Geographically, the Caucasus, especially Transcaucasia, is undoubtedly a continuation of Asia. The Georgians, however, in contradistinction from the Mongolian Azerbaijanians, belong to the so-called Mediterranean, European race. Thus Stalin was not exact when he called himself an Asiatic. But geography, ethnography and anthropology are not all that matters; history looms larger.
In saying that, he had in mind no problematical racial attributes, but rather that blending of grit, shrewdness, craftiness and cruelty which has been considered characteristic of the statesmen of Asia
Trotsky and being a goddam moron, name a more iconic duo
Yeah I'm pretty sure Krassin and Bukharin are being racist AF. Just thought it was a good source about what people thought/said at the time, including Troskey (Why Stalin is not Asian 1/? a thread).
"white" is just a bunch of mixed race people who turned really pale due to eating a mostly lactovegetarian diet in the darkest place in the world
Georgia is in Europe (the power of Orientalism, innit)... also, by indigenous white Europeans, they meant Nazi and Fascist collaborators...?
Projection again (tell me again who wanted lebensraum?) ...
Straight to the
no education can help that warped of a mindMainly in case you were wondering, this was the Nazi cringe shit the pic was in reply to.
That doesn't make sense https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Indigenous_peoples_of_Europe
It's not meant to? It's meant to frame Europeans as an even more cartoonish level of bloodthirsty imperialists.
Europe belongs to er...the wild mosses and such. Everything else is some kind of Afro Asiatic migrant
Are the sheeple capable of anything besides smart-alecky wordplay?
It's not genocide IF YOU'RE BEING PUNISHED FOR PREVIOUS CRIMES! I know thinking isn't their strong point, but oh my God...
That isn't a new take, but one i didn't hear in a while since new layers of white genocide conspiracy are piling up upon old ones.
