https://twitter.com/ricwe123/status/1659592008166522880

  • Teekeeus [comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pushing russia and china together is such a massive geopolitical blunder on the yanks' end lmao

    • puff [comrade/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have completely undone the Sino-Soviet split. It's unbelievable.

      • Teekeeus [comrade/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I'm glad that Kissinger is alive actually

        I want him to watch the decline of the american empire

        • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Having him croak off after seeing a total collapse of what he built is the only silver lining of him living so long.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      What the Yanks failed to realize is that most countries that have disputes with China are actually super friendly with Russia. Besides US proxy states like Japan and South Korea, every other Asian country that's not friendly to China like India has warm diplomatic relations with Russia, which means they'll most likely check out of any real attempt to contain China since that would mean displeasing Russia. In the end, an anti-China alliance is going to be nothing but US proxies and Australia, so a grand total of 6ish countries.

  • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    There was also a huge transfer of public wealth into private hands, so at least for a handful of people that was a win.

  • Jew [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I'm still so pissed off that no politicians challenge the Afghanistan withdrawal propaganda. The USA strategy from day 1 was regime change and nation building. We followed that strategy for 20 godamn years. Turns out both areas were monumental failures exposed by the withdrawal. GOP politicians that voted for these wars and propped this up get absolutely no blame when the "Afghanistan was a failure" conversation comes up. Like no challenge from a single democrat saying "your plan failed" or "GOP strategy created this". It's maddening.

    • serveranim [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not so much GOP as DC consensus. When you get into it, the R's and D's don't disagree on much. They play baseball together, the snarling and slavering is just for show.

      I still don't know how whoever controls Biden got a withdrawal. I guess it'll be another decade or two before we find out. They were planning on occupying Afghanistan for another 50 years.

      • RedDawn [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were basically forced out of Afghanistan, the withdrawal negotiated with the Taliban was in lieu of being embarrassed even worse by the Taliban forcibly removing the US troops themselves, with the only alternative to that being a massive increase in the number of US troops which would have not had any buy in from the American public. They lost the war, similarly to how they lost the war in Vietnam, and the idea that they were somehow winning but just decided to leave is just cope. The Afghanistan papers showing that the Pentagon knew the war was unwinnable and had been lying about it being anything else came out years ago.

        • serveranim [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who said they ever wanted to win?

          It wasn't winnable but it was certainly continuable. The Taliban were never going to forcibly evict the Americans. They had been in that situation for two decades, what's another five?

          Whoever forced the the Americans to withdraw was in DC, not anywhere in Afghanistan.

          • RedDawn [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            The taliban were never going to forcibly evict the Americans

            Yes they were.

            They had been in that situation for two decades

            The situation changed continuously over two decades with varying levels of US troops and Taliban fighters, the latter had grown considerably in the last couple years, and the only way for America to maintain a presence on the ground in the face of that would have been to commit significantly more troops of their own once again. You're Joe Biden and you're faced with leaving Afghanistan and thus being the president that finally ends the unpopular forever war and brings the troops home, or doubling down and sending more Americans to Afghanistan. You're going to be running for reelection in a couple years, what do you do?

            • serveranim [none/use name]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes they were.

              First I've ever heard of it, and I've followed it on and off since the invasion.

              You’re going to be running for reelection in a couple years, what do you do?

              I would have let Trump take the blame, since he was so adamant about ending wars by forcing America (DC) to lose them.

              • RedDawn [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Trump admin is the one that reached the agreement with the Taliban for withdrawal. When he did so there were 13,000 US troops there and by the time Biden took office there were like 2,500. Biden admin has indeed pointed the finger at his predecessor for the sloppy withdrawal. So essentially, you would have done exactly what Biden did in this situation. So what's the mystery?

                • serveranim [none/use name]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This novel idea that the Taliban were about to evict the US from the country. Wasn't going to happen without a plan out of DC.

                  • RedDawn [he/him]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    OK I guess the 13,000 US troops were going to hold out for 50 years against 200,000 Taliban or something

                      • OrionsMask [he/him,any]
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        Typical cracker yankee hubris and rhetoric. Of course our "high tech" white troops can hold out forever against the "illiterate" brown hordes, it doesn't matter that they're outnumbered nearly 20:1! One of our boys is worth easily 30 of theirs!

                        Death to America

                      • RedDawn [he/him]
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        Why not? Because they couldn't. The options were get out entirely or commit a much larger number of troops.

                        • serveranim [none/use name]
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          Uh-huh. I would have heard about that. I don't suppose you can supply some sources on this from the DC blob.

                          • RedDawn [he/him]
                            ·
                            edit-2
                            1 year ago

                            Read the Afghanistan papers.

                            I would have heard about that.

                            Apparently not. Apparently you've followed it since the invasion but don't realize that there were up to 100,000 American troops at points before handing over the baton progressively to the Afghan government which was so lacking in legitimacy that the Taliban numbers were growing massively again in the last few years and controlled the country within weeks of US withdrawal. So somehow the handful of US troops could have just stayed for as long as they wanted without once again committing far more troops, despite the large and growing resistance to their presence.

                            Edit: I misquoted you so editing to correct that.

                            • serveranim [none/use name]
                              ·
                              1 year ago

                              controlled the country within weeks of US withdrawal.

                              Again, the decision to withdraw was made in DC and not in Afghanistan. We don't know why, and probably won't for some time, but "forced out by the Taliban at the point of a bayonet" wasn't it.

                              The generals and the DC blob were furious. They were adamant that the situation was fine and they could have maintained occupation for another 50 years. Those are the accounts that I read; maybe you can contribute some that said the Taliban have militarily defeated us and we must withdraw before there's a wholesale loss of tens of thousands of soldiers like it's Berlin 1945 or something.

                              • RedDawn [he/him]
                                ·
                                1 year ago

                                There couldn't have been a loss of tens of thousands of soldiers because there weren't even that many there. That's exactly what I'm saying, there was absolutely no way of staying WITHOUT MASSIVELY INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF TROOPS.

                                How the fuck are you still not getting it?

                                They were adamant that the situation was fine and they could have maintained occupation for another 50 years.

                                And the entire point of the the Afghanistan papers is that even the exact same people who made these sorts of statements publicly years ago, were saying privately that the war was unwinnable. Inevitable loss.

                                Yes, they were forced out. The insurgency was strong and growing, there was no way to stay without massively increasing troop numbers. America lost a war once again to a bunch of farmers I'm so sorry that this hurts your chauvinist pride.

                                • serveranim [none/use name]
                                  ·
                                  1 year ago

                                  You're arguing against something I didn't say. The war wasn't to be won. It was to be continued. Forever. If they won they'd have to leave.

                                  I’m so sorry that this hurts your chauvinist pride.

                                  OK I am done with someone who is deliberately distorting and misstating what I'm saying.

                                  • RedDawn [he/him]
                                    ·
                                    edit-2
                                    1 year ago

                                    if they won they'd have to leave

                                    No, they wouldn't have, they could have set up permanent military bases and stayed for as long as they wanted if they had won. But they didn't, they lost.

                                    They would have had to increase the number of troops to stay any longer, that's the answer to your question about why they didn't. Ramping up the war again after years of promising to end it was not worth it in any sense politically or militarily. The military industrial complex can be fed while doing something that at least has a chance of achieving other national interests, as in Ukraine or Taiwan or whatever.

                                    The war in Afghanistan was lost, the US failed to accomplish it's objectives and eventually quit while it was behind.

    • DoubleShot [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m still so pissed off that no politicians challenge the Afghanistan withdrawal propaganda

      Because they all voted for it? They all voted for every increase in military spending and for every time congress needed to authorize something. Also, the moment some politician speaks out, their opponents will just attack back with “you don’t love America and our brave troops!? Maybe you should move to China!” or whatever. And being accused on not being sufficiently patriotic is like the worst fear of every US politician.

  • Fuckass
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • Wheaties [comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      i kinda think we've just been so focused on our own internal bullshit, nobody in DC has noticed the petrol-dollar tipping over

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its crazy how much money they piled up, only to flirt with bankruptcy again the moment oil prices dipped below $100 dollars a barrel.

  • serveranim [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    And we're still squatting on the oil-producing area of Syria and literally stealing the oil! It's being shipped out and sold and the money pocketed.

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They forgot:

    -lost Vietnam and committed war crimes

    -lost NK and committed war crimes

    -Created the Taliban because they prefer fascists instead of the will of the people

    -uses sanctions to starve any country that democratically decides they want a leftist leader by the will of the people.

    • invo_rt [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      My favorite is that Mexico decided to nationalize some of its natural resources, like lithium, and now suddenly, GOP primary candidates are talking about sending troops into Mexico to "fight the cartels." It's so fucking obvious.