These are the people liberals compromise with

  • REallyN [she/her,they/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    “House Democrats on Tuesday killed a Republican resolution that would have effectively banned the Democratic Party or any political organization with a past history of supporting slavery and the Confederacy.”

    This is kinda hilarious though.

  • GrouchoMarxist [comrade/them,use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    would have effectively banned the Democratic Party or any political organization with a past history of supporting slavery and the Confederacy

    It hurt itself in its confusion

    • Mindfury [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      imagine if some sneaky motherfucker got this through and "accidentally" just deleted both parties forever lmao

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
        ·
        4 years ago

        More like a restoration of a communist party lmao. The bill said it wanted to ban any party with ties to supporting slavery, and we all know that Communists take the John Brown approach to slavery.

      • BlueMagaChud [any]
        ·
        4 years ago

        I suppose this makes the Democrats Dr. Pepper due to the irrelevant flaunting of educational credentials

        • Sushi_Desires
          ·
          4 years ago

          This is slander to his 23 flavours and I won’t stand for it

          • BlueMagaChud [any]
            ·
            4 years ago

            dude's probably a podiatrist as if that has any bearing on fizzy drinks

            • crispyhexagon [none/use name]
              ·
              4 years ago

              doctor, my foot has been feeling a bit flat lately

              yes very normal. drink one coka soda cola pop and call me in the morning if it isnt back to fizzy

  • Mike_Penis [any]
    ·
    4 years ago

    holy shit this is the ultimate "BUT DA DEMONRATS DID SLAVERY!!!!!"

    • the_river_cass [she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      it's probably worded to avoid that by carefully splitting what support for slavery means.

        • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]
          ·
          4 years ago

          More like allows Google to spy on everything you do more effectively and effectively control web standards to its exclusive benefit. If a website doesn't implement it, it negatively impacts your search result score and places your website lower in the rankings with the justification that it's meant to make the web experience on mobile better.

          My recommendation is to always use ublock origin ad blocker on desktop and reader view on mobile (available on safari and firefox on iOS and at least firefox on android).

          • prismaTK
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • kristina [she/her]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              yeah but duckduckgo's algorithm sucks duck dick

              i honestly dont care about completely anonymized trackers, just show the source code for your site.

              • prismaTK
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

            • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]
              ·
              4 years ago

              Same. But truth be told without addons I don't really care that much. I just use Safari in private browsing mode, anything I need to remember I bookmark. Apple's privacy stance is good enough.

        • realPaavoVayrynen [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          more like google uses its monopoly on search engines to coerce you into writing a version of your web page with their proprietary html extentions and serves it from their own cdns