I watched the entire video, but I timestamped the link to where I believe it matters most for any comrade that ever liked Star Trek, liberal idealistic and quasi-militaristic flaws and all, and would like to see a succinct and thorough summary of what they might have already felt, may have already inductively collected for themselves, but got it drowned out by "well the TNG gang got together by the end of Picard Season 3 so just enjoy it like a popcorn movie, 4/5" or even worse brainworms like "section 31 is based and it's just cold hard reality that such an agency would have to exist for the Federation to exist, just like in based Deep Space 9 which was totally about wars and genocidal biowarfare plots and how cool and necessary they are."
The Trek fandom site in the Lemmyverse is loaded with insufferable liberal/libertarian 
and a fair amount of Thermian Arguments that justify anything that was presented on screen as not only good, but necessary if they were done by protagonist characters, and not just the flaws, weaknesses, and (for lack of a better term) sins of characters that weren't intended to be infallible, let alone blindly emulated, no matter how cool it was when Sisko punched Q or whatever.
TL;DR: I hope comrades find value in this concluding section of a much larger video, or maybe even watch the whole thing, which I also think is worthwhile. Also, I fucking despise Section 31 apologists because they make the Lemmyverse's Trek site unbearable for me. If Kurtzman gets his way (especially with that Section 31 series he keeps jerking off about), Trek will become increasingly murderfucky gory edgy black ops obsessed bootlicking schlock with a vague and redundant nostalgia flavor.
I have this running theory that a lot of Discovery and Picard was written by people who haven't watched Star Trek, but do browse the wiki. I can just picture someone not really into Trek stumbling on the article for Section 31 and think, "Woah, this must be really cool and important!"
It's disappointing. DS9 was pretty unambiguous in its portrayal -- Section 31 is a violation of Federation ideals and shouldn't be allowed to continue. There is potential for an interesting story, but it's fundamentally not the story these guys are interested in telling. To them, Section 31 is just cool terminology to throw around; "I have the super-duper Q-clearance for top secret cool spy stuff!!!"
I agree, and i think 40k prefigured this. There are a lot of artists my age who remember how cool this stuff was when we were six, but they never learned why the slop was like that - they didn't go back and watch kurasawa and the battle of midway and the maltese falcon. They just like star wars. So when they try to make star wars we get jar jar's star wars. Like jj abrahms is a smart dumb guy so when he was given a big bag of money and told to make star wars he made star wars.
Rian johnson is a. Smart smart guy, so when he was told to make star wars he went and made, idk, casino royal and master and commander and a couple of other things, along with a meta-commentary on hero-worship that was frustratingly loyal to how Luke was portrayed (a petulant kid in over his head who kind of only won because of a moment of empathy when confronting a sith lord) and how the jedi were portrayed (a bunch weird old wizards living in exile who never told the truth straight and mostly fought by using clever misdirection.
Jj's movie sucked because it was star wars fan fic. Rian's movie had a bunch of good parts that didn't gel, i assume because he's in over his head. Subsequent star wars has followed the something vaguely like a pattern - when Mandalorian was Lone Wolf and Cub in space it was cool. When it started trying to be star wars it sucked. We're lurching in to simulacra and simulacrum territory where star wars movies are cheap copies of star wars movies instead of being cheap copies of some of the best movies ever made but with rubber aliens in space. Rogue one threaded the needle by being a cool wwii partisans doing a heist movie, andor isn't a star wars show at all and that's why it's the best star wars show, while a lot of the other stuff is increasingly fractally self-referential clone wars cartoon auto-eroticism.
Lotr? Peter Jackson made a Lord of the Rings movie. Then, idk, hbo or whoever said "well that made a lot of money let's drop the orcs, add a lot of sexual violence, and make our own pastiche of Jackson's movie and we got gambo. And then it started feeding on itself and we got epic fantasy shows that were trying to eb hbo's rip off of lotr instead of either trying to be a rip off of a better movie, which is where star wars is good, or an original adaptation of a good story, which is why Jackson's lotr worked.
I have hope for that gargoyles adaptation if it ever happens because gargoyles is a fun rip off of shakespeare and Branaggahs entire career has been making fun shakespeare movies, so he just has to do what he's good at but this time it's softcore cgi monsterfucker erotica, and he's a horny cornball so he'll be great at it.
But what's this war of rohan anime? That's the most boring fucking thing in all of lotr and i 100% gaurantee you that the tolkien estate gave it to them because they thought "there's nothing here for you to desecrate give us the check".
Idk what else is even happening out there, i very rarely watch tv shows and i've seen little to make me regret that lately.
The batman stuff does this too, all the cape shit. Batman was a standard costumed pulp adventure dude. 60s batman was a fun silly movie about comic books. 90s batman was a high camp celebration of how silly comic books had become. Nolan batman was fascist erotica and where the wheels really started to come off. Everything since have been batman movies trying really hard to be batman movies and have, accordingly, sucked ass.
Likewise with marvel capeshit - blade was a cool movie about how bad ass Wesley Snipes is, and was way better and more popular than the blade comic. Iron man was about look at this cool fucking guy. WInter Soldiers, for me hands down the best one was a 1970s political thriller and for authenticity they even got fucking Robert Redford. Subsequent marvel movies have mostly tried to be marvel movies and have been dogshit. A thing trying to be itself is going to end up being a poser, and as we all know a poser is the worst thing you can be. Then with dead pool we had a couple of marvel capeshit movies that were entirely about how silly and absurd marvel capeshit was, and that was fun. Idk if the new one was good, but it does seem to be a movie about how silly it's own success at being silly is so maybe it worked idk.
Godzilla minus one? Wasn't trying to be a godzilla movie. It was a movie about modern Japan's struggle between fascist nationalist revanchism and an attempt to finally move past that insane shit and let Shinzo abe and all his buddies, and the war, die. It was about how Japan is enslaved to the us at no benefit to itself and how it's government are inept, useless neoliberal cowards who can't find their asses with both hands. A bunch of civillians fight godzilla with crap they have lying around because neither their american overlords nor their captured, useless government will help, and the whole time they are looking directly at the screen saying "the war was a miserable failure that destroyed japan. There was nothing good or honorable about it except that some people were lucky enough to survive. We do not want to go back, we must not go back. The people of Japan must reject nationalist militarism, the US's geopolitical manipulations, and our shitty government and chart our own path or godzilla is going to wreck us".
Cool as fuck, best Godzilla movie sense the first one, all because it's a movie about contemporary Japanese culture and politics that uses Godzilla as a stand in for the threats facing Japan - as is tradition - instead of being about godzilla.no one being able to afford to have children in Japan's fucked up economy is a key plot beat. Excellent film.
Then with dead pool we had a couple of marvel capeshit movies that were entirely about how silly and absurd marvel capeshit was, and that was fun. Idk if the new one was good, but it does seem to be a movie about how silly it's own success at being silly is so maybe it worked idk.
It triples down on the absurdity of capeshit in a way it's hard to see how they top it.
Blade gets a brief cameo.
Thanks for writing about the Godzilla movie. I had heard some buzz but didn't know about the depth to it's concept. I'll have to check it out!
Lotr? Peter Jackson made a Lord of the Rings movie. Then, idk, hbo or whoever said "well that made a lot of money let's drop the orcs, add a lot of sexual violence, and make our own pastiche of Jackson's movie and we got gambo.
I remember that Gambo was once directly marketed as exactly that: "this is Lord of the Rings except for GROWN-UPS." Insulting Tolkein's work that way put me off from the very start and then I had to keep hearing about the very mature murderfucking for like a decade after because cultural saturation.
But what's this war of rohan anime? That's the most boring fucking thing in all of lotr and i 100% gaurantee you that the tolkien estate gave it to them because they thought "there's nothing here for you to desecrate give us the check".
I was so bored watching the trailer that I didn't even complete the trailer. It was so... uninspired. Rankin/Bass did it better decades ago with more heart.
Idk what else is even happening out there, i very rarely watch tv shows and i've seen little to make me regret that lately.
I'm the same way. I guess I'm waiting for the next and final season of Lower Decks before Kurtzman finally "Section 31s" away my remaining love for Trek.
Christ, right?i read gambo years before the show, got to the end at that time, and moved on. And then the show happened and i started re-reading it and was like "this is all miserable, all these people are horrible, only bad horrible things happen. Nooooooope" and put it down. All i remember about the show is that the armor looked awful. But i still got to hear about it for years while being unable to participate in any conversations because ir ead the books and knew what happened next! it was agony!
I'm glad we got lower decks. At least some group of artists out there "got" it.
this is all miserable, all these people are horrible, only bad horrible things happen.
Years ago, before the show officially shit the bed, when I so much as expressed dislike for that "everything sucks, everyone sucks, everything's smeared with shit and everyone left alive with any agency is an asshole" setting I got back "heh, not everything can be sunshine and rainbows, snowflake. Not everything can be a morality play, either."
GAMBO IS ALSO MORALITY PLAY. THE MORAL IS THAT BETTER WORLDS ARENT POSSIBLE, ATTEMPTING TO CHANGE THEM IS NAIVE AND MAKES THINGS WORSE, AND YOU'RE CHILDISH IF YOU AREN'T OINKING ALONG AND GOBBLING THE SENSATIONALISTIC SLOP.
One of the few timelines I can think of that'd be even more clownish than this one would be where the "D&D" trust fund sexpests had Star Trek fall into their laps instead of Gambo.
: p
Yeah i would not want to see their star trek. JJ's Star Trek was bad enough.
Kurtzman's long wet dream of making some "Section 31" production, so I hear, may finally happen in movie form.
I hope it crashes and burns like most of his giggly edgelord trash. There's definitely still a market for grimdark hog slop, but he tends to be too pretentiously liberal and inclusive in his murderfucking to court enough hogs to the slop trough.
"I have the super-duper Q-clearance for top secret cool spy stuff!!!"
Black ops
is also a convenient writing trick because if it's all super duper maxi extreme double secret things can just pop in or out of frame with only as much explanation as the writer feels like giving to justify it.It's like those really pretentious "genius serial killer" movies from years back where the laziest possible writing move is "HE'S SO SMART HE PREDICTED EVERYTHING WE DO! WE'RE JUST PLAYING HIS GAME!"
Yeah, its lazy writing. At least in Deep Space 9, you get the sense that while Section 31 has enough connections to keep itself hidden, it wasn't all powerful. If I were gonna pick up the plot threads, I'd have it be what it was first stated to be: a small group of essentially vigilantes, high on their own mythology and exploiting the gaps and shadows of a huge organization like the federation.
I think in some ways, Star Trek let liberals indulge in American Exceptionalism. Like, here's all the values we purport to hold, being evangelized by a good democratic federal government and its space-navy! Yes, they're socialist; but its because of replicators! Don't worry about it! Obviously, this varied across episodes and writers. Some might be more explicitly socialist, some might have a little more yankee-brainworms. But New Trek feels like its all in on the American Exceptionalism. So now Section 31 is just Federation CIA and they do "critical work" whatever that means
Yeah, its lazy writing. At least in Deep Space 9, you get the sense that while Section 31 has enough connections to keep itself hidden, it wasn't all powerful. If I were gonna pick up the plot threads, I'd have it be what it was first stated to be: a small group of essentially vigilantes, high on their own mythology and exploiting the gaps and shadows of a huge organization like the federation.
Bashir's encounter with them made them seem like a few assholes that were propping up a more menacing front with more resources than they actually had access to, and pretty much just criminals with too much clearance.
Theeeeeeeen NuTrek gave them le epic drone armadas and le scary AI cliches with "Control." And for some reason massive drone swarm battles where it's hard to tell what's even fucking happening and it's all smeared and pewpewpew in a boring way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI6QQs8ImWg
Compare that to, say, the Battle of Dollyworld in Orville where I find myself actually caring because the stakes emotionally matter and it isn't just a bunch of copy-paste wanking and one-upmanship special effects:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caBzvF9hwkI
I think in some ways, Star Trek let liberals indulge in American Exceptionalism. Like, here's all the values we purport to hold, being evangelized by a good democratic federal government and its space-navy! Yes, they're socialist; but its because of replicators! Don't worry about it! Obviously, this varied across episodes and writers. Some might be more explicitly socialist, some might have a little more yankee-brainworms. But New Trek feels like its all in on the American Exceptionalism. So now Section 31 is just Federation CIA and they do "critical work" whatever that means
That was my experience with the smuglords of the Lemmyverse Trek site. "Believe whatever you want but this is all about sports teams and of course the coolest seeming team is the bad guys but don't call them bad guys because it's totally more complicated than that. We're the adults in the room." It's that "Grey Jedi" power fantasy from Star Wars all over again where a fandom conjured up a bullshit escapist way of having cool dark side powers without being dark siders.
I found YouTube links in your comment. Here are links to the same videos on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Link 1:
Link 2:
Angela's rant is great, but she also misses something. Season 2 of Picard is when this circus went from 'not getting it' and 'not wanting to make star trek' to being outright evil.
One of the most interesting aspects of Star Trek is how it evolves over time. Which includes how the canon evolves as well. What's key is how this happens in respects to how humanity built its utopia.
In the original series it was a complex trial by fire sort of thing. Fascist eugenics lead to WW3, and humanity got out of its hole with some alien solidarity from the vulcans. Its 1960s style alien messianism combined with cold war fears and the proximity to WW2 that lead to those ideas. 1990s Trek limited itself to calibrating where the emphasis was placed. All of those are still true and part of the story (TNG reminds us of it), but DS9 makes it clear that political struggle for equality and economic freedom were a part of it all while Enterprise reminded everyone that Humans did not achieve utopia by inventing replicators. They didn't even have replicators when they eliminated poverty, hunger and disease.
Picard meanwhile made everything including Climate Change reliant on finding a microbe in space. It's not humanity that overcomes difficulties. It's magic. And that's the showrunner's worldview. It's not just bleak and hopeless. It is that fascism is inevitable because there's no other option other than magic.
Maybe it's just me but it feels like a lot of US media lately carries this hopeless assumption that because the American Dream turned out to be bullshit and the American Empire is declining into naked fascism, humanity as a whole is doomed to follow the same path. The concept that US imperialism is reaching a limit and is heading towards the dustbin of history is not even entertained.
Picard meanwhile made everything including Climate Change reliant on finding a microbe in space. It's not humanity that overcomes difficulties. It's magic. And that's the showrunner's worldview. It's not just bleak and hopeless. It is that fascism is inevitable because there's no other option other than magic.
The Disco makers went
and I think the Picard makers had a similar belief that "none of this can be solved unless some tech bazinga pops out of nowhere. I love Great Man Theory I love Great Man Theory"
I feel like i could sit across a slowly cooling basket of shitty diner fries with this woman going "right?" "Yes!" "I agree!" "Omg thank you!" Etc etc for like, idk, six, maybe eight hours two or three days in a row. I feel pretty much the same way about star wars, fallout, lotr, and when microsoft announces the Elder Scrolls series at some point in the next 18 mos i'll feel the same way about that, too.
We're entering some bold new hell. Capital is trying to turn very big, unwiedly, difficult entertainment products like massive shows, games, and movies in to something like paid per line victorian era pulp slop that can be churnned out endlessly on a tight schedule, while also trying to strip all the craft and expertise out of it and turn the helm over to "ai", while also trying to meet their state mandated propaganda goals and their marketing goals and shore up the declining rate of profit. More and more parts moving faster and faster in ever tighter circles. And there's no bottom so it will go on getting worse, faster, in more perverse ways, until something drastic happens.
In the mean time please join me in declaring yourself a co-equal owner, creator, producer, and writer of lord of the rings, star slop, or whatever other story you love, and start making your own slop and refusing to call it fan-fic and just saying " fuck you, this is the true and authentic cup of christ because if a welsh story about a cool guy can turn in to fucking Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade and speilberg doesn't have to call it fan fic then I can write my own stories about random elves and I don't have to be fake humble about it."
If we don't steal our stories back from them they're just going to keep doing this shit until they wring all possible joy out of them. Lancelot is a self insert slash fic character and so can you!
Forgive me; I was sloppy in how I replied and didn't really add contextual cues to link what I was ranting about to what you were ranting about.
Edited now and hopefully more coherent. I really should have been in bed like an hour ago, lol.
We're entering some bold new hell. Capital is trying to turn very big, unwiedly, difficult entertainment products like massive shows, games, and movies in to something like paid per line victorian era pulp slop that can be churnned out endlessly on a tight schedule, while also trying to strip all the craft and expertise out of it and turn the helm over to "ai", while also trying to meet their state mandated propaganda goals and their marketing goals and shore up the declining rate of profit. More and more parts moving faster and faster in ever tighter circles. And there's no bottom so it will go on getting worse, faster, in more perverse ways, until something drastic happens.
It's getting harder and harder to even call out the enshittification of entertainment; I think consumers are sort of "entertainment malnourished" already and so they fight harder over whatever slop they still get. It may sound like hyperbole, but I truly sincerely believe that "to each their own" is a particularly potent cognitohazard cliche, where some of the symptoms of its influence include most discussions barely going further than "which product in this franchise do you like the most" and maybe "which product in this franchise can beat the other products" where even the idea of criticism causes wagon circling and tribalistic defensiveness. Just gobble the slop. Keep filing forward. To each their own.
Show
In the mean time please join me in declaring yourself a co-equal owner, creator, producer, and writer of lord of the rings, star slop, or whatever other story you love, and start making your own slop and refusing to call it fan-fic and just saying " fuck you, this is the true and authentic cup of christ because if a welsh story about a cool guy can turn in to fucking Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade and speilberg doesn't have to call it fan fic then I can write my own stories about random elves and I don't have to be fake humble about it."
If we don't steal our stories back from them they're just going to keep doing this shit until they wring all possible joy out of them. Lancelot is a self insert slash fic character and so can you!
I do agree with you that "fuck you, I'll do whatever with this because it's being turned into corpo sludge anyway," buuuuuuut when it comes to fanfic... when the rich and powerful play with it, it becomes "canon."
Remember how in The Force Awakens, the Force didn't need to be awakened until a failson hack fanfic maker got the reins and decided to destroy the Jedi off-stage right after the previous movie had just returned them, and featured not-Tatooine, not-Yavin, and a not-Death-Star-BUT-BIGGER that destroyed not-Coruscant because the first spoken line of the movie was "this will make things right" because PREQUELS BAD AMIRITE TOP KEK RESET EVERYTHING THATS A GOOD TRICK. JJ Abrams is the adult version of that bratty rich kid in the neighborhood who destroys his neighbors' toys by bashing them together or maybe scratching his name on them with a pocket knife to claim they always belonged to him because look at this mark here.
I don't even think it's possible for sufficiently connected failsons to actually fail in a meaningful way. How many franchises has Kurtzman damaged, or even destroyed, and yet he still keeps making bank (do you even remember the "Cinematic Universe" he claimed he'd launch with his horrid and deeply unfun Mummy rehash?)
More than ever, I outright reject "popcorn movie" as an excuse for lazy hacky slop. Some movies can be fun and lowbrow, but how many decades of "popcorn" should be allowed as an excuse to nod along as everything is further blended toward grey corpo sludge and reconstituted over and over again with larger and larger corporate acquisitions happening all the while?
Oh shit that universal monsters... universe thing! I forgot about the bad tom cruise mummy movie.
but I truly sincerely believe that "to each their own" is a particularly potent cognitohazard cliche
It's in gaming, too. "There's no wrong way to play if you're having fun!" Yes their fucking is! It's a game. Games by definition have rules. If you're not playing according to the rules in good faith in a multiplayer game you're fucking over the other players. If you're doing it to yourself in a single player game you're ruining your own fun. A game without rules is either you cheating, or imaginative play. Neither is a proper game. It's fine to cheat in sp games if you want, but people keep bringing this up as a justiication for demanding changes in the way sp and coop games are designed, implemented, and maintained and once you peekl back through the layers of people arguing about things they don't understand - difficulty systems, artist intent, the relationship between player and dm, there's a startling number of people who just fundamentally do not understand what "play" is. Like not playing games, or not being able to explain the different between play behavior and a game, they don't know how to play because of the monetized restricted entertainment hell we're all trapped in. They don't know how to have fun. They can't engage with a toy it it doesn't have skinner box systems and victory condtions, nor can they even in theory recognize why a game might place rules and restrictions on the player. Like somehow the inborn human ability to play, imagine, and experience fun has been destroyed in a big chunk of the population and all that's left is skinner box dopamine chases.
"There's no wrong way to play if you're having fun!"
Almost without exception, when I saw "it's just a game" during an online game, it was a justification for being an asshole, a bigot, or a bigoted asshole. It was the gospel of militant apathy, where the worst crime is caring about anything at all. It was hypocritical, of course: most of those assholes would get really mad if you used "unskilled" weapons in an online shooter, or if your team used strategies that were considered badwrongfun, or gods forbid someone is found out to be gay or feeemale, or worst of all, traaaaaaaaaaaaans. No longer just a game; shit gets real for them then
they don't know how to play because of the monetized restricted entertainment hell we're all trapped in
Treatbrains that bully "defaults" in Fortnite come to mind there. I've been around kids in school that did exactly that toward other kids, offline, tormenting them for being "defaults." Teenage enforcers of monetization.
Like somehow the inborn human ability to play, imagine, and experience fun has been destroyed in a big chunk of the population and all that's left is skinner box dopamine chases.
I see this in the "canon" obsessed lore humpers of most major fiction settings. Until and unless someone on a movie screen says it out loud, it can't happen, stop talking about it, stop finding your niche in what is already fiction. I think there's some symptomatic issue there where they can't imagine themselves in the setting unless they are directly "canon" themselves. Most glaring example are the "Kirito Starks" of Final Fantasy XIV where they slap on what they can on "canon" character names, mix them up until the game accepts the entry, then lurk in Ul'dah chat channel raging about how much they hate trans people (while often playing female characters "because I want to look at this ass all day" as they often say)
Treatbrains that bully "defaults" in Fortnite come to mind there. I've been around kids in school that did exactly that toward other kids, offline, tormenting them for being "defaults." Teenage enforcers of monetization.
That's awful. We had pressure to have cool clothes and spending money back in the day, but not pressure to buy mtx. : p the most pressure i had to look cool in games was from the ultima online bank squatter crowd and most people would give you
Double replying but whatevs - i think the "too each their own" thing, people don't have enough outside referrents to discuss media. All the star wars and marvel and bat slop are all made by JJ, Gunn, and like four other dudes so all the stories they've seen for the last ten years are the same man children telling the same stories the same way with the same actors. All that changes is how saturated the colors in the sweat-shop forced labor last minute cgi is.
You have to have seen some kurasawa movies and some wwii battlefield footage to appreciate and discus Star Wars and those who disagree can take a number, i an currently fighting the prior wrong person and will be with you shortly. You can't talk about why star wars ships do that if you haven't seen gun pod footage from the battle of midway. You can't talk about lightsaber fights (forms, barf) if you haven't got at least some idea that samurai cinema exists.
And people don't. Their whole life they've been trapped in this world where since harry potter came out in 1997 every media product is part of an all fronts scorched earth campaign to take all of your attention all the time every day.
Star wars began the great work, hp completed it, and now every media project at least aspires to be a 24 hour all encompassing life style of food, clothing, cars, artifacts, apps. I'm sure there are hundreds of thousands of pages analyzing how often apps and ads should interact with your customers per hour based on their age, gender, etc. You're not supposed to go outside. Each group of media products is supposed to be a walled garden that is at least capable of being some people's entire living experience outside work hours. And, like, yeah, i'm exaggerating, but the combined effect of all these enshittifying products trying to take all your attention all the time, is they're undergoing fierce evolutionary selection leading to convergence on a few forms, meaning people live in these horrible frankenstein prison's stitched together from the rotting flesh of whatever media property group manages to grab their attention. They go from marvel to dcto star wars to potter to gambo to whatever, and it's all the same plots presented the same ways by the same writers, actors, and show runners reinforcing the same messages, just this horrifying cybernetic hell cave out of plato's most derranged dying multiversal ayahuascu death nightmare. The cave is inside us, around us, everywhere. There is no end to the cave. If you go outside the cave you only see yourself staring back. You cannot escape the cave. The cave is all. The cave loves you. Look at the shadows on the wall, consume, be upset in the ways the cave wants you to be upset so you buy more cave shit to assauge the case upset the cave caused you so it could sell you cave theme'd anti-cave upset cave products cave cave cave cave cave cave cave cave cave!
I'ma. Little concerned that my covid lead to an opportunistic strep infection actually...
Double replying but whatevs - i think the "too each their own" thing, people don't have enough outside referrents to discuss media. All the star wars and marvel and bat slop are all made by JJ, Gunn, and like four other dudes so all the stories they've seen for the last ten years are the same man children telling the same stories the same way with the same actors. All that changes is how saturated the colors in the sweat-shop forced labor last minute cgi is.
I used to call this "Baytification." I know it probably didn't start with Michael Bay, but there's still a mostly Gen-X rich bored asshole demographic that tends to get nostalgia IPs dropped into their laps and then they decide to "give it a shot in the arm" and "reimagine it" by turning their uninspired crude imitative fanfiction into "canon."
The most cursed treats timeline I can think of would be one where "Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality" was somehow canonized in such a way.
You have to have seen some kurasawa movies and some wwii battlefield footage to appreciate and discus Star Wars and those who disagree can take a number, i an currently fighting the prior wrong person and will be with you shortly. You can't talk about why star wars ships do that if you haven't seen gun pod footage from the battle of midway. You can't talk about lightsaber fights (forms, barf) if you haven't got at least some idea that samurai cinema exists.
had a rant summarized as "anime was a mistake" that was actually about copy of a copy syndrome, which I've talked about with you recently before (while mixing up the Miyazakis, my bad)And people don't. Their whole life they've been trapped in this world where since harry potter came out in 1997 every media product is part of an all fronts scorched earth campaign to take all of your attention all the time every day.
I feel this so bad. It's easier now that I'm in a more remote, older, and dare I say more rural area, but before I moved out of CA, many people around me were out and out treat hogs and they needed me to also be a treat hog and get excited about the next product because it has NOSTALGIA CHARACTER and that NOSTALGIA CHARACTER gets TORN APART IN A GORY WAY OMG SO SUBVERSIVE AND EPIC. Ever meet a NuTrek enjoyer offline? There aren't many, I think, but those that existed were definitely concentrated in my area. Icheb's death scene was talked about just as excitedly as "DAE LE RED WEDDING" and "DAE LE SHAME." Bored lanyard liberals crave human suffering on their screens.
And, like, yeah, i'm exaggerating, but the combined effect of all these enshittifying products trying to take all your attention all the time, is they're undergoing fierce evolutionary selection leading to convergence on a few forms, meaning people live in these horrible frankenstein prison's stitched together from the rotting flesh of whatever media property group manages to grab their attention. They go from marvel to dcto star wars to potter to gambo to whatever, and it's all the same plots presented the same ways by the same writers, actors, and show runners reinforcing the same messages, just this horrifying cybernetic hell cave out of plato's most derranged dying multiversal ayahuascu death nightmare. The cave is inside us, around us, everywhere. There is no end to the cave. If you go outside the cave you only see yourself staring back. You cannot escape the cave. The cave is all. The cave loves you. Look at the shadows on the wall, consume, be upset in the ways the cave wants you to be upset so you buy more cave shit to assauge the case upset the cave caused you so it could sell you cave theme'd anti-cave upset cave products cave cave cave cave cave cave cave cave cave!
Yeah, fuck Multiversus.
I'ma. Little concerned that my covid lead to an opportunistic strep infection actually...
On the upside, you had the most immersive Disco Elysium experience I can think of.
I firmly believe that everything is cannon and there is no such thing as fan fiction, but I have difficulty conveying why I believe that. I completely agree, and very well said.
Watch all four hours cowards.
But yes, I loved her analysis of how Section 31 existing fundamentally ruins the entire setting of Trek.
The last time I tried to comment on a Lemmyverse Trek thread, an entire comment chain got derailed with standard issue
about how every atrocity that DS9 characters did under pretense of winning the Dominion War was not only justified but absolutely necessary because that's how the episode went.I don't know how to deworm brains that are that eager, even craving "adults in the room" to do atrocities for them to enjoy.
I really liked the Lower Decks episode where they take apart some of the worse parts of DS9, like the gold pressed latinum.
Lower Decks is a treasure in so many ways. It even dunks that "say no to drugs no matter the circumstances, screw your material conditions" TNG episode even with its playfully merciful reveal of "it was a very bad idea to just put a planet through withdrawals but the Cerritos crew were lucky and didn't have to see the worst of that."
I tapped out after 2 or 3 episodes. It's not dignified to trot this old man around.
bat'leth remember bat'leths!? remember worf?!It gets worse. The show gets into the habit of trotting out old nostalgia characters and ripping them apart in gory spectacles because Kurtzman is a giggling prestige tv goblin.
Ya know I might watch a four hour video about star trek, but I sure as hell won't watch a four hour video about Star Trek: Picard, a show that I have not watched, that I have no interest in watching and really couldn't care less about what it "does" to Star Trek.
The only actually interesting thing about Star Trek is how it reflects reality and the times it was made in. NuTrek doesn't ruin the original Star Trek, it doesn't even do anything to it. It's just some other random thing that some other random people made because some random company decided is going to increase the value of the "intellectual property" that is the Star Trek™ brand. And the fact that it is bad television made only for profit, that it is a sad and depressing turn for the original vision of the future that Star Trek used to be sometime back in the 60s is kinda sad, but it's also nothing but a reflection of the state of the world in its least creative, visionary and hopeful iteration. Any part of your heart that you put into that nebulous thing that is Star Trek over the years should flow freely from thing to idea to thing and back and not be exclusive to what really amounts to nothing but a brand. It's high time to get over it.
If anything Star Trek has been the poster child of cultural stagnation and reaction for all of its life, it being after all the original "show that got cancelled but then uncancelled after the fandom complained about it for a decade". It's not even just that, it's the original "fandom" show, the show that originated "fanfiction" and everything that comes with it.
And even in its best, most hopeful and visionary form, Star Trek has always really been a terribly limited show: What has it ever been besides "Wagon Train to the stars"? Always taking place at the imagined "frontier", always marching west. Sure, the show might have told you it took place in a post-scarcity quasi-communist utopia, but have its stories and its form ever felt like it?
It's a testament to the sheer force of reaction that followed the 60s (and also and maybe even more the short-sightedness of the 60s themselves) that ever since we have lost not only our ability to imagine a better future, we've even lost the ability to imagine a better television show.
if anyone wasn't convinced of this posts power,
And even in its best, most hopeful and visionary form, Star Trek has always really been a terribly limited show: What has it ever been besides "Wagon Train to the stars"? Always taking place at the imagined "frontier", always marching west. Sure, the show might have told you it took place in a post-scarcity quasi-communist utopia, but have its stories and its form ever felt like it?
should have sealed the deal. true words we all know r true but aren't said enough
good post
but it's also nothing but a reflection of the state of the world in its least creative, visionary and hopeful iteration.
Great post but I do want to nitpick this. Star Trek isn't a reflection of the state of the world, just the state of the world imagined by the writers living in the decaying western imperialist powers. I don't think the entire world or even a majority of it shares the pessimism of US liberals, and I think there's plenty of creativity and vision left in humanity even if US television is utterly bereft of it.
Ya know I might watch a four hour video about star trek, but I sure as hell won't watch a four hour video about Star Trek: Picard, a show that I have not watched, that I have no interest in watching and really couldn't care less about what it "does" to Star Trek.
I did timestamp it to the final 20 minutes, which were more about Trek in general and summarized the points well.
I'd just like to remind everyone that Discovery S1 is completely plagiarized from some small indie game on Steam. Even though the poor guy lost the lawsuit, its pretty fucking obvious the writers had someone use literal google results for inspiration.
I loved her video and this is a great compilation but others have made the same criticisms for some time now. The RLM reviews go over most of these issues in a much shorter time.
I did not know about the Patrick Stewart biography thing but it only serves to show how much of a useless piece of shit he is. I do not care about the whatever good contributions he may have made or said, he can go die in a fire.
If you haven't already I recommend once again reading FADE IN: From Idea to Final Draft. PDF here. Its not like Michael Piller is a saint or anything but the Patrick Stewart letters should be put in any Trek museum IMO.
Again the quotes I love from PS
PS letter quotes
One deliberate change we made was to Picard. We toughened him up, chipped away at his smooth surface, roughened and intensified his feelings. Shifted him from Captain/ Diplomat/Philosopher to Captain/Rebel/Activist.
I feel that, in a sense, we had reinvented ourselves - or had begun to. The ‘story’ of the series was over and we were now telling a different story with our movies. That is what I want to see continue.
That is the background to the unease that I feel with this new story. It seems to reflect the series much more than where we were at the end of First Contact. This compounded by Michael referring back several times to aspects of the series you want to see in this film. That is what I see as retrograde and dangerous and, ultimately, dull.
The family building aspect of TNG is passed. Not dead, but the work is done. Most of our audience know who these people are and how they feel about each other and our new audience - the audience the studio are so eager for us to win and hold - don’t need to be told that. They will pick it up.
I don’t agree about our being explorers again. I think that is series material but not movie material. Heresy though this may be, I do not think our movie duty is “to seek out new life and new civilizations...” though it still is “to boldly go...”
I think there is real danger in the mindset that “there are certain things that our audience come to expect...”
And lastly - though far from leastly - sex and comedy. Two elements of life that I have come to think as critical in the TNG movies. I tell you I think our stories have got to be sexy. I don’t mean ‘sex scenes,’ God forbid, but a certain eroticism, a certain sexiness about our characters and situations is really helpful and fun. Let’s be honest, there is an inclination to stuffiness about our crew. For the same reason humor is vital and again I don’t mean set-piece scenes - though as I have said, Picard with the mariners could be a great sequence. I think our crew are adorable when they are witty, ironic, self deprecating, teasing, cheeky.
Yes, witty, ironic, self deprecating, teasing, cheeky are definitely traits that describe the TNG crew. God what a moron.
When she talks about Nemesis and the movies in general its important to realize just how terribly similar all of this is to the TNG movie era. You can read the nonsensical Patrick Stewart letters and how he so desperately wants to abandon the TV series.
Yeah they got PS because of Logan but Picard also turned out like this exactly because PS is an idiot that hates the TV series. If PS wanted it we could have had a more TNG relatable Picard series, but this idiot only wanted to make a statement about Brexit. The whole segment of why "Space Fox News" exist is exactly because of that mandate I'm 100% convinced. Yeah in the biography he brags about Season 2 but that was not his only input lol.
He said he didn't want a TNG "reunion". That was major bullshit, not only to shit on his fellow actors, but it would force the show back to the TV era. He always wanted to be a Movie StarTm like it was popular in the 90's and I fully believe that the Picard series was doomed from the start, PS would never come back to do actual real good TNG era Star Trek again, period. The success of X-Men did not change his mind, in 2018 he still wants nothing to do with the TV series.
Kurtzman and all are still complete assholes but its not like they could have made TNG 2.0 with Patrick Stewart either. It all just sucks for 30 years now.
I'd just like to remind everyone that Discovery S1 is completely plagiarized from some small indie game on Steam. Even though the poor guy lost the lawsuit, its pretty fucking obvious the writers had someone use literal google results for inspiration.
I'd like to know more about this. I never heard about this before.
I tell you I think our stories have got to be sexy. I don’t mean ‘sex scenes,’ God forbid, but a certain eroticism, a certain sexiness about our characters and situations is really helpful and fun. Let’s be honest, there is an inclination to stuffiness about our crew. For the same reason humor is vital and again I don’t mean set-piece scenes - though as I have said, Picard with the mariners could be a great sequence.
Did these bazingas even watch TNG or did they just browse Memory Alpha? The show was already horny at times, sometimes to the point of meme value.
because PS is an idiot that hates the TV series
He's the direct reason why there's some silly dune buggy scene in Nemesis. That was all him.
The TNG movies convinced me that Stewart no longer understood his most famous character. The series Picard convinced me that he never did in the first place.
At first I thought that was some weird late life shift, but then I realized he always has been that way.
There was a series of blogposts/reviews from when Picard came out where the author more or less convinced me that Stewart did understand character - he also didn't like him. The reason why Picard is filled with these unearned emotional moments is precisely because Captain Picard is a stoic character.
There was a lot of talk on that lawsuit but sadly it was taken by the anti-woke rw YT grifters. but here its his blog. Anas's personal life was quite sad actualy, but the blog is still online and the case story is absurd. The game was created years before Discovery and the theory is when Brian Fuller left the Kurtzman team was crunching for time so they just copied whatever.
Show
What makes it a slam dunk is not each one taken individualy obviously, but how everything just happens to be a coincidence.
The trial ended up being about the Tardigrades and that was what the CBS wanted to focus on because it was the only technicality.
Its funny because if you make a science fiction show with a French Captain, an Android, a POC engineer on a ship that has a particular disc shape section where they all wear red blue and yellow uniforms, where they work for an "alliance" of planets and end up fighting a sort of cybernetic enemy you know Trek lawyers would be on your ass.
the theory is when Brian Fuller left the Kurtzman team was crunching for time so they just copied whatever.
I already hated Kurtzman and I now hate Kurtzman just a little bit more, the smirking chin rubbing hack.
section 31 is based and it's just cold hard reality that such an agency would have to exist for the Federation to exist
i mean this is literally my defense of China/the USSR/DPRK etc etc, you literally do need some clandestine bullshit intelligence agency when you're beset by those of others
this isn't a section 31 defense because I'm not enough of a nerd to know all the holocausts they've done for liberalism
I reluctantly agree with you the same way that I acknowledge that most ideas of "don't tell me what to doooooo" anarchist utopia come apart the moment a more organized force decides to invade and take what it wants.
Even so, I fucking despise the "every atrocity is justified if the unaccountable shadow people, or the writer, says it is"
that some get out of DS9 and especially from NuTrek.Hehe, reluctant agreement, my favorite kind of agreement
But yeah no i agree, it's just lib shit if it's used to handwave away "we did a genocide" or whatever. Nutrek sucks, it's just action schlock and it's not even good it's all shaky cam action schlock
If Kurtzman gets his precious Section 31 show finally off the ground, it'll make those bloodthirsty wine liberals even more insufferable in Trek fan communities. Some say I complained too much about Gambo, and well, I am pretty sure I'd hate any sort of successful enough Section 31 prestige tv shit enough to eclipse even that if it got prominent enough in pop culture somehow.
It is possible to complain to much about gambo, but only in so far as there are much more interesting things to complain about where there is more productive discussion to be had.
I am truly grateful that the Gambo juggernaut is slowing down and coming apart. Maybe it's just the change of scenery and people around me, but not once this year did I have to hear about the unmissable must-see moments like DAE LE RED WEDDING and DAE LE SHAME in whatever might be the recent murderfucking treats.
I know almost nothing about "House of the Dragon" except it had a shitty unsatisfying ending, which doesn't surprise me whatsoever.
I've heard house of dragon is okay - much less awooga and sexual violence for it's own sake, more dragons.
That's nice, I suppose. Still sounded like misery for misery's sake from what I heard about the first episodes.
How about that ending, then? Did Lucy keep the football in place for the kick?
Oh I have not watched it and never will, I just heard it's less grotesque.
I am glad for that I suppose, but as I've said before, diluted sewage is still sewage to me.
Good news and bad: the Section 31 show has been cancelled, but it's gonna be a movie instead now
That means less overall cultural exposure, but possibly a heavier impact if it has any success at all.
I'm sure if there's plenty of "adults in the room making the hard decisions and getting shit done" the hogs will oink and gobble it up, especially if it's loaded with Gambo shit like sensationalized SV and the like. Corpo media will do the old "this isn't your father's boring old Trek! It's mature now and by mature we mean murderfucking and quips from smirking sociopaths between SV sessions!" that boosted Gambo into the stratosphere if the movie is successful enough.
Oh yeah the head douche of that terrible Lemmyverse argument I got into was really, really into the idea of the Terran Empire's time traveling and universe hopping Mary Sue (with Section 31 associations too because OF FUCKING COURSE) made friends on the Discovery and therefore felt kind of bad for what she did and would "reform" the Terran Empire somehow, pinkie promise.
I said that was a load of bullshit and even if she meant it, it wasn't even so much as pulling out the knife as Malcolm X once put it; the atrocities are already done, claiming to feel bad about it doesn't undo the damage.
I got an astonishingly basic smug P R E S T I G E T V enjoying liberal barrage of "heh, you are babybrained and clearly dont understand what the adults in the room are doing"
that ended, of course, in a last word game.I wanted to like the Lemmyverse Trek site, but that wasn't the first time a bunch of smug neoliberal
was exchanged there, without me saying a damn word, where they gladhand each other about "to each his own" as if ethics in the Trek setting are just sports teams or like Star Wars lightsaber colors and costume choices. No surprise, Team Evil is the most popular and they want to feel like smart cool insiders, like their edgelord counterparts (or themselves) in Star Trek Online that fill their characters' biography spaces with "BLACK OPS TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED RUMOR HAS IT EXILED SHADOW FORCE NEED TO KNOW BASIS" while commanding the ISS Ayn Rand.Ueeeueueueugh star wars light saber colors! It's literally just so you can tell who is one which team, but apparently in the shows now you sword changes colors if you wangst hard enough because something about inner turmoil or some shit. The idea that the dark side is a real verb, it's using you magic powers to take things and hurt people and not an abstraction or a mood, is too much for some!
Grrrrrrr this glowbat is bleeding because I want to drain all the goodness out of your goodness crystal
Show
I'm still pissed that Lucas signed on to that Clone Wars episode with the Nice Moon and the Mean Moon and the god of enlightened centrism preaching that everyone needs a balanced diet of peaceful contemplation and murderfucking for maximum space magic gainz.
Ugggggggggh nooooooooooooo fuck all the episodes where the force was in any way personified!
The only story i can think of that did the "you must be 50:50 good:evil crap are the Recluse books. And they had order chaos and worked on the premise that the more order magic you concentrated in one place the more chaotic everywhere else got. Recluse was a little hermit magic liberal super-power nation that had basically stolen and sequestered all the order magic in the world, allowing themselves to build steam punk super weapons and leaving the rest of the world subject to chaos magic which was really good for war magic and breaking things. They had all the build sustain and preserve magic, everyone else pretty much had " fireball!" And recluse used their magic to build ironclad gunships that only they could use because anywhere else a chaos magician could snap their fingers and detonate the powder magazine. So it wasn't actually good and evil and it was actually justified by the magic system - the liberals had done, idk, magic imperialism to the rest of the world and reaping the bennies while everyone else suffered both from the absense of magic for sustaining, strengthening, and building and also a flood of magic suited for disassembling, weakening, and dismantling. And no one benefitted from processes that employed the two forms in harmony as a complete system.
A big part of the first book and honestly the only thing i remember is the kid from the super Orderly lib society leaving and finding out that chaos wasn't actually evil and had legitimate uses beyond casting fireball.
I was prepared to get really mad at Final Fantasy XIV before I actually played Shadowbringers and found out how they'd expand the cosmology, mythos, and magic system to explain how light and darkness really work. I hate "neutrality means only murderfucking half the time" fictional morality systems, so it was nice to have the reveal that light and darkness were energy, just like the other elements of fire, lightning, wind, water, ice (no idea why ice is its own element but it's magic so whatever) and earth, and that all of them could "flood" and destroy ecosystems and entire worlds. Evil still exists, as intent, and the utter annihilative force is an absence of such magic in the form of nihilistic despair as applied through akashi, or dynamis. Not perfect, but it was actually nice to separate good and evil from the elemental system entirely, no matter the reputation of "black mages" in the setting versus "white mages" before.
I've got one in another thread trying to tell me that Billups isn't ace right now it's a silly place
Billups isn't ace
EXPLAIN THIS BULLSHIT
... I'll check it out after I come back. Sleepy.
Mr. Billup's orientation has always alluded and intrigued me.
I think most evidence points to him being asexual (like his comment in 2x07 "Will it hurt" maybe implying he doesn't experience attraction and his general lack of demonstration of any romantic interest where every other senior officer does).
However, there are a couple of things that might point to him being gay, bi, or pan. His hologram duplicate in Crisis Point: Rise of Vindicta seemed to show almost a romantic interest in Rutherford's character, although it could just be wanting a platonic bestie to share his engineering hyperfixation with (the platonic aspect being seen in his loneliness in the mess hall at the end of the episode). In addition, in 2x07, the soldiers sent by the queen could be evidence of her knowing Billup's orientation.
"Absolutely any opinion made of the character must be equally valid, and as such any sort of platonic friendship or fondness must automatically be weighed equally as possibly sexual tension. Actual sexual expression presented in the show, or lack thereof even when pressed, means nothing in the face of the power of shipping."
Thanks. Sleeping will be slightly harder.
I look forward to parsing through your many emojis if this terrible fate you've predicted does come to pass
I look forward to parsing through your many emojis if this terrible fate you've predicted does come to pass
I'll probably be like
Show
Some of the morally questionable things in DS9 are more justifiable. Like In The Pale Moonlight, where Sisko and Garak assassinate a Romulan Senator to trick Romulus into joining the Dominion War on the Federation's side. Hell, I expect that when the Romulans eventually find out about that they'll respect it as a very Romulan sort of plot. Notably, Section 31 wasn't involved in that one.
My favorite part of Discovery was the episode where the anthropologist yells "holy shit Klingons! You have to punch them in the face as hard as you can right now or we'll all die!" And then they don't listen to the anthropologist and they don't ship-punch the klingons and then they do all die. Idk if the other episodes were good.
I'm talking, like, the genocide attempt on the entire changeling species. One particular chud on the Trek Lemmy site said that was the only way to save the Federation... which it clearly wasn't even in the show as written because clearly that genocide attempt didn't actually go off as planned. Maybe another example of "it didn't happen, but it should have"
Yeah, that was especially egregious. I also hated the time Sisko poisoned an entire planet because Eddington was being too antifascist near him
Memes about how Sisko was infinitely based and all that tend to voluntarily mention that shit, too.
I can accept a flawed character struggling to survive and endure a dark time for the Federation. When his atrocities become "based" to edgier fans that basically saw DS9 as "THE ONE WITH THE WAR WAR WAR WAR WAR" I get really tired of their shit.
Somewhere in another universe there's a version of DS9 where the focus was on rebuilding Bajor and all the complex post-revolution politics that inevitably happens, and not on technobabble and CGI space battles. We got glimpses of what it could have been like with episodes like "Duet", "Shakaar", "Progress" and "Past Prologue". What could have been.
While I enjoyed DS9, I'm on my guard whenever someone in the internet wild says DS9 is their favorite Trek because there's a significant chance it's because of atrocity enjoying/apologia and WAR WAR WAR WAR WAR WAR lanyard warrior fixations.
Oh fully agreed on that. My personal litmus test is what they think of "Duet". If they don't remember it, that's a bad sign, because it's easily the best episode of the series.
I do think that DS9 was consistently better written than TNG on average. But on rewatches I just find myself disappointed with how many missed opportunities there were. In canon, Bajor is an old world, rich in a variety of cultures. There's so much that could have been done with that setting in a post-occupation political-infighting context. The first few seasons started to go down this road. But in the end we got almost nothing. Honestly during rewatches I tend to skip most of the latter half of the series. I just don't find the war to be interesting.
In contrast TNG was never really trying to be anything other than modernized-for-the-1980s TOS. Just high-concept episodic sci-fi. It succeeded brilliantly at that once Roddenberry's counterproductive micromanagement was over by the end of season 2.
To be fair he made the planet toxic only to Humans after Eddington tried to make it toxic only to Cardassians
I mean its a bit outta pocket, but there's a million planets and he was trying to make a really funny point
Yeah but there's a difference here - Communist intelligence units are full of commies, and can be a net good and continue to be a net good as long as they continue to be full of commies. Their goal is to defend the star trek future. Their enemies are the guys who think that Section 31 make cool protagonists.
If you look at the cold war, one thing I'm amazed by is how cheap you can by an American patriot. It's fucking chump change, beer money. And it's always because America's spies don't have financial stability and a good quality of life.
Meanwhile the Russians had guys inside Hoovers toilet counting the boils on his ass.
You'll find endless discussion on why, but i'm pretty sure at the end of the day the commies were fighting for an idea, and the americans, regardless of what they believed, were fighting for a roof, braces for their kid, cancer treatment for their mom.
The section 31 these show runners have created aren't hard nose old revolutionaires who have seen and done terrible things in the name of a good and honest ideology. The show runners are all end of history kids. They grew up after the world of ideology and belief had ended. For them there's only the status quo, forever.
Starfleet can't boldly go because they've already arrived at the end of history. Starfleet is america, section 31 is the cia and fbi and army, the only conceivable goal is to maintain the status quo forever. And int he world of the show runners that means that as the status quo decays for reasons they are ideologically not allowed to understand the intelligence services, the section 31s, use increasingly mask off violence to keep the wheels on.
Sci fi is always about society in the present day. Picard is about america, no. With no soviet union who can the romulans or klingons be? There's no one left except competing "bad" capitalists. There's no revolutionary future, just a static liberal now. They can't tell star trek stories because they don't live in a world where kids can be allowed to dream star trek dreams, because that would be better than what we have. And better isn't allowed. The status quo must be defended, and that demands that the star trek future, the better future, the we came in peace for all man kind future, has to be killed. And it's most important that it be killed in the dreams of children.
I do like the concept of a Section 31, it was executed well enough in DS9 and offered something of a critique on the whole trope of "Hard shadow men doing what needs to be done" (the nu-trek version tho is pure post 911, 24-ass, tacticool brainrot that I personally consider anti-canon)
But the concept itself presents an interesting hypothetical; how would a future socialist utopia deal with the intelligence agencies of fascist interstellar empires? It's why I've never been particularly annoyed by the weirder poltical aspects of Trek lore, obviously they originate from the liberal politics of 90s era writers and producers and Genes idiosyncratic "maoism", but there's not much to do with that information besides mope about the dominance of liberal cultural hegemony
What's fun for me is taking the nonsense at face value and either subverting or deconstructing it with your own pet theories about how this socialist utopia presented to us on screen could work, it's utterly useless but fun daydreaming
I don't even mind when chuds get in on the action and come up with the dumbest interpretation of fiction known to humankind, their lore craft is easy to debunk and its fun to point out the contradiction in their self-identification with characters who would phaser or quarantine them on a deserted rock
Have you ever read the Culture novels, by Iain M. Banks? They explore a somewhat similar idea to "intelligence agencies of
fascistpost scarcity interstellar empires".I can't remember if the contacted civilizations are ever socialist, although there's definitely a more feudal one and the overall themes may be interesting to you nonetheless.
There are more than a few passing references to contacted civilizations that are pretty primitive in terms of technology but very advanced socially. The result being that they are contacted a lot sooner than capitalist societies, which have to be subtly pushed and nudged into being less shit.
I love the shirt story, State of The Art, where they decide to use Earth as a control and not get involved at all
Oh damn, I forgot that part about "Earth being the control". That's hilarious!
My favorite one of them is Excession. I found the relationships / culture between the ship AI's so interesting and frankly, better written than many human relationships in the series overall.
It was a fun book and definitely exposes the lib brained tendencies of the Culture ruling elite (the Minds).
Look to Windward is my favourite. I love its pace. We see more day to day Culture life in that one than any other, and we also get to see the consequences of their meddling when it all goes wrong. Ziller is a great character and he is played so well by Peter Kenny in the audiobook.
their lore craft is easy to debunk and its fun to point out the contradiction in their self- identification with characters who would phaser or quarantine them on a deserted rock
It gets harder when the series gets into the hands of bazingas that go
"WOW EPIC BLACK OPS ORGANIZATION" and give them fleets, apocalyptic death computers, and try to make "good one" sympathetic only-reasonably-murderfucking black ops operatives. Space Starks, basically, just like in the Gambo treats.
The Ideology of modern reboots often comes down to "it wouldn't have gone down like that if I was on that plane, I can tell you that much."
The Ideology of modern reboots often comes down to "it wouldn't have gone down like that if I was on that plane, I can tell you that much."
Hot damn, you're right!
Gunna' check this out. After the Guys Podcast episode on Trek Guys the other week I've been craving Star Trek. I've never watched Voyager (outside like random episodes at my childhood friend's house) so maybe I'll watch that sometime soon too.
I'd ignore that shit entirely and not even notice it myself if it didn't keep getting smeared all over Trek discussions online the way "WHO WOULD WIN IN A FIGHT AND BY THAT I MEAN WHO DO YOU THINK HAS MORE MIDI-CHLORIANS" threads dominate Star Wars discussions.
if alex kurtzman wants to rip out ichebs eye, apropos of nothing, does that mean alex kurtzman thinks that most TV shows could fit on-screen eye gore?
hahahahahaha just kidding! the answer is actually yes, because alex kurtzman loves putting this horrible kind of thing in all the crap he works on and he really aught to be held accountable for it (IN MINECRAFT)
When the shitty NuMummy came out, I saw Kurtzman and his giggly punchable face on an interview saying he had a monster in himself and he believed audiences would all see they all have a monster in themselves as well, you know, the "human nature" capitalist realism gospel.
A thief tends to believe everyone steals.
