Remember to follow the Traaa com rules or else you are liable for any action that mods deem necessary
IMPORTANT SITE REMINDERS ARE LISTED AFTER THIS RANT (so please read all of it in order to find the rules >:3)
On this mega I shall take the opportunity to rant about one of my favorite things: the Webnovel UNJUST DEPTHS!
Do you love transgenders?
Do you love communism?
Do you love queer romance?
Do you love killing fascists in a giant fucking mech?
Would a plotline with all of these things happening in a underwater retro-futuristic gundam setting intrigue you?
Especially if its actually really well written with good characters, rich worldbuilding, and a marxist leninist transfem author?
All of the answers should be: YES I DO or else I WILL BAN YOU
Since you obviously love all of those things then Unjust Depths is perfect for YOU yes YOU! It is DESTINY
The Imbrian Ocean is at a time of severe instability. The monarch of the vast Empire that spans its unjust depths (:3) is sick and nearing death, every territory of the ocean now vying to carve their own Destiny out of the chaos. From the Volk fascists 
, Zionists 
(they literally will not die why are they still here oh my god), The 'Anarchists' (social chauvanists) 
in Bosporus, and the monarchs 
of each vast noble domain, each vies for power and prestige no matter who they crush underfoot, but it would be a pretty depressing story without a bright light in the dark.
On the edge of the Empire sits the glorious Union! The (Soviet) Union 
is a socialist federation of three states (and one anarchist mountain 
)that were formerly slave colonies under the Imbrian Empire until they broke away in a fierce liberation war. They have spent the last 20 years since then building themselves up. Whether they be Human 
, Shimmi 
(Catgirls who usually follow a religion closely related to modern Islam), and Kattaran 
(a hybrid humanoid species with characteristics of sea life ranging from sharks to cuttlefish)building socialism side by side.
First lead under the revolutionary leader Dashka Kansal, then the Idealist Ahwalia who lead the country to near ruin in pursuit of building a utopia on pillars of sand, then under the scientific socialist 
leadership of the Grand Marshall of the Union, Bhavani Jayanskar (I love Jayanskar so much shes basically as if Stalin, Lenin, and Zhukov were rolled into the same person but was a black lesbian badass who wore the uniform REALLY WELL)(she aint the main character at all tho shes only in very few scenes i just love her so much). Under Jayanskar, the Union has been growing their economy to both eliminate hunger and give everyone a home 
, but also growing their military capabilities for the inevitable return of the Empire. The Union is alone, but with the people by its side nothing, not even Destiny, can snuff out true freedoms light. 
As war wages between the Empire and Republic (basically underwater USA) once more over the lands between them, the facade begins to finally crack...
And a border conflict between the Empire and Union escalate, and the dreaded reconquest begins.
Amidst this turmoil, lives our main characters (yes there are multiple and all of them are lovely). Each of whom I personally love dearly, and are very well characterized. Many are soldiers of the Union, some are scientists, some are divers (mech pilots), some are lost strands finding new meaning after joining this band of Brigands
All are Communists 
All serve the Union 
All would gladly give their lives to defending socialism 
but even they would have little inkling of the adventure set in store for them as the lands beneath the waves erupt in fire, fury, and revolt
Can these transgender badasses kick fascist ass?
Can they kiss? (oh my god please kiss ISTG THERE IS SO MUCH SHIPPING AHHHH ITS GLORIOUS)
FIND OUT HERE: https://unjustdepths.com/
please do or else I will pout incessantly
just try it pleeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaase i need to talk to someone about it after Cromalin went AFK
(I miss her, she was a real one)
REALLY IMPORTANT RULES BELOW, MUST READ
Join our public Matrix server! https://matrix.to/#/#tracha:chapo.chat
As a reminder, be sure to properly give content warnings and put sensitive subjects behind proper spoiler tags. It's for the mental health of not just your comrades, but yourself as well.
Here is a screenshot of where to find the spoiler button.
According to the manual from Peavey that I found a pdf of, it "the TIGHT function reduces the gain and alters the EQ of the Lead channel to provide a quasi-third channel that mimics the CRUNCH channel on the original Invective 120 head for a more articulate and full sounding high gain option than that of the full blown onslaught of the Lead channel."
lol, full blown onslaught
So it's like, an anti-boost pedal that tightens up the lead channel to make it into a crunch channel?
Math is not my strong suit lol
In my experience, they tweak the overall response to how "bright" or "dark" changes to the EQ effect your tone. I've noticed them changing the feel of an amp more in higher watt amps where you turn the master volume up more and keep the channel volume down for more "headroom" at the same decibel output. If your bass/mid/treble controls on the EQ are like, three lights pointing out of the amp that changing the dial on effects the brightness of each, resonance and presence are like adding a tinted screen in front of the bulbs. Changing the resonance and presence settings changes the amount of tint or the color of it in this analogy I guess? You're coloring the entire EQ range with them, but not actually cutting or boosting specific ranges individually. I found this article that explains it more articulately and more knowledgeably than I can.
The Bluejay is a Fender Blues Junior clone, the Tweed is a Fender Twin clone, and the Atomic is a Box AC30 clone.
Classic Twins and AC30s are both open-back 2x12" cabs. I think most Twins have Jensen C12K speakers and AC30s have Celestion Greenbacks. I don't really know how much the type of wood effects the sound of the cab, I know birch cabs have a reputation of being "brighter" and oak cabs have are supposedly "warmer" relative to each other, but it might be like fretboard wood where some people swear maple boards are "snappier" and rosewood is "darker," but it's a really minute detail to me. I don't claim to have the best ears by any means, but there's a lot of woo in gear snobbery. It's a lot like audiophiles with hi-fi stereo setups in that way sometimes.
Yeah! From what I've heard, they're all really cool affordable little amps. They make a cute little 1x8" cab to match them for $100 that has a Celestion 815 in it too.
they know their audience!
I have to admit, I am not sure I followed that quote, other than, lol, you know.
Same, lol, I should have said "technically" in retrospect. And, actually, I should have asked for an analogy, because...
This analogy really helped. Thank you!
Damn, I can't find the Tweedy anywhere I can buy it in Cold Country, but I'm also not really sure where to look haha.
So I'm getting here that size and number of speakers is probably #1, and then speaker type is #2? And then there's probably minute differences after that between wood type (and yes I've heard about the fretboard woods lol)?
Yeah totally, it makes it really really hard to navigate some of this stuff. It also pushes prices up, I want something I know is good, but like some of this stuff is so many thousands of dollars I would be using on something else, and how much of a difference is there? Few people on the internet seem to want to say "I spent $2k on a Fender Twin, and this $300 setup was just as good." probably because they're invested into it, and there's a whole bunch of psychology at play too. Idk these are just idle thoughts.
Tbf I like high-quality sound but I agree, it's really hard to avoid some of the "Snake Oil" stuff. I've probably overpaid on audio equipment in the past.
I'd say in order of significance,
Size of speaker(s). 12" are the standard for the majority of guitar amps, but smaller speakers can be found mostly in combo amps. Smaller speakers can't reproduce lower frequencies as well, but still sound really good. A lot of famous recordings were made with small combo amps cranked in the studio that had 10" or 8" speakers.
Type of speaker(s). Magnet type, alnico vs neodymium, etc. Don't know much here. All I know here is a lot of vintage classic tones had alnico speakers and that neodymium is lighter weight and is supposed to stay more signal accurate at higher volumes than alnico.
Number of speakers (a 2x12 played at the same volume as a 1x12 with the same speaker is still going to sound different with all other things equal since multiple speakers all outputting the same signal are going to have miniscule imperfections in the signal's reproduction that'll make the 2x12 sound "fuller." This is basically what a chorus pedal effect does with a lot more exaggeration than two well paired speakers of the same model.)
Open or closed back cabinet (other things equal, an open back will feel more "open" and have brighter high end response, closed will be "punchier" and have more low end.
Angle of speakers (angled vs straight 4x12s, they "fill a room" slightly different depending on the venue, natural room reverb and perceived volume at a distance will be different between an angled or straight 4x12 because of an angled cab's top two speakers pointing upwards slightly.)
Cab wood type (uhuhuhuh... "wood.")
okay, wow!! this is a great simple explanation actually, literally no one on the planet has been able to say this in a way i understand, thank you!! thinking about cabs ... thanks forthe explanation! (gonna save this post too :))