• Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    To be fair I saw one "Pal" that just straight up used Zoruas model.

    Nintendo never cared about stuff like Digimon or Cassette Beasts, so I'm guessing the problem is actual models made by Nintendo were used. Buuuuut this is Nintendo and they sent people cease and desists over Pokemon fan games FFS, so who the hell knows.

    I mean, Palwords developers are skeezy, but on the other hand so is Nintendo, also fuck copyright.

    • doublepepperoni [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 months ago

      Since it's a patent lawsuit they're going after game mechanics rather than character designs, but we don't know which mechanics yet

    • Anvil_Lavigne [she/her, they/them]
      ·
      2 months ago

      Digimon

      i get that they're commonly seen as rivals outside of japan (because saban localised the anime w/ the very intention of challenging pokemon, instead of leveraging the obvious differences), but like, if nintendo had gone after digimon, they'd be going after literally anything featuring monsters. the original 1997 iteration of digital monster was "tamagotchi for boys," which is where battling & evolution comes in comrade-raccoon

      obv the similar names might seem awfully sus, but as i understand, the abbreviating of names like that is fairly common in japan. like, if we knew the franchises as pocket monster & digital monster, there would still be a similarity there, but it would seem less egregious ig.

      thank u for suffering my autism

    • Infamousblt [any]
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly Nintendo has had some big wins lately getting people to fold rather than fight in court even when the fight should be winnable. Maybe they're just hoping that happens here too. Get these guys all tied up in court even if Nintendo knows they won't win just to keep the Palworld devs occupied with the court fight rather than making their game