That would raise average wages to about $63 an hour from $39 an hour over the life of the contract.

The union and the port operators said in a statement that they would extend their master contract until Jan. 15, 2025 to return to the bargaining table to negotiate all outstanding issues.

https://xcancel.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1841973125996585431

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ship-queue-grows-us-ports-dockworker-strike-enters-third-day-2024-10-03/

  • ComradeLeonie [she/her]
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Not quite sure why people here are that happy about it. If I understand this correctly then this isn’t even enough to cover current inflation, removes their right to strike for the next 6 years, has no hours-reduction, has no single payment to cover the past inflation. I don’t see how this is a win for workers. This seems like a huge win for the companies considering what else would have been possible.

  • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    So I'm relying on more knowledgeable bears here, but this is basically a manifestation of unions without theory right?

    Without state support unions will be assaulted by capitalistic mentalities and turn into gangs?

    • macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      33 seconds ago

      idk about state support. but yeah without bringing socialism in, there's nothing that makes unions directly fight for the working class as a whole, just for the interests of that segment of it. This strike could have had wider political implications, e.g. Maersk was one of the employers. The most extreme example is cop "unions" that actively fuck over the working class, but lots of unions sacrifice the rest of the class a little bit. For instance working people need public transit, Chicago's transit system has had a big operator shortage for several years, but the union made it really difficult to get a job as an operator (have to first do 1 year in an essentially unrelated menial role with few openings). Or you get Hoffa teamsters

  • Walk_On [he/him]
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I do hope they vote out their LIB leadership since workers were allowed to cross the picketline to help load military weapons.

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The typical American is unbelievably reactionary, I'd be shocked if the majority of the membership even mildly disapproved of assisting the burger reich.

  • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Ngl it's still kinda bittersweet since they still agreed to load military equipment. Just more chauvinism, but I'm wanting too much for burgereich workers to have solidarity with international workers.

    • Lemmygradwontallowme [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Just more chauvinism, but I'm wanting too much for burgereich workers to have solidarity with international workers.

      Yer not wanting too much... you just feel what abolitionists feel when the Missouri Compromise was made

  • Inui [comrade/them]
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is so funny because it seems like most recent strikes have only lasted like a single day before the company folds. Which is great. But it shows why they try so hard to prevent the strike in the first place and try to portray strikers negatively because once the strike is called, the company has already lost.

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I was genuinely expecting Brandon to break it again, but I'm happy to be wrong. If Kamala's team is smart they'll spin this as a win for them hard.

  • macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]
    ·
    4 hours ago

    so they've stopped the strike in exchange for a promise of a contract next year? and the promised contract is an 8% yearly raise? idk about this one

    • Sulvor [he/him, undecided]
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is a massive wage increase and a win for the union.

      Going from 80k year to 130k could easily be the difference from scraping by to living comfortably if it’s a single income with kids.

      • macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        14 minutes ago

        4% yearly raise after inflation. It's better than nothing, but I think the right thing to do is strike until you win a contract with all your demands. Helps prevent union leadership from becoming collaborationist. I don't know ILA internal politics

      • ryepunk [he/him]
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Except, it isn't going from 80k to 130k instantly. It's going to 89k, then 96k and so on. Only reaching 130 by the very end of the 6th year. Which might be good if inflation behaves, but if things keep going badly (ie workers continue to get big raises) then the inflation managers at the fed will punish labour some more to make those wage increases meaningless just like they did to the wage gains from over the pandemic.