If good art of adult women wearing clothing that would be perfectly acceptable in most casual settings is horny posting and is wrong, then I don't wanna be right. I've seen more scandalous poses and outfits in PG-rated movies.
Yeah. I had to go through a vetting process to be appointed officially joyless. It involved someone calling me that when I criticized the Gambo treats.
As usual it's a sci-fi movie with no sense of scale. A million soldiers is enough to conquer maybe a small country on Earth. In the Star Wars universe, assuming their galaxy is about the size of the Milky Way and they have the same approximate rate of planet formation, that's enough clones for a single security guard to cover roughly about 100,000 planets.
Update, I made a mistake, I described Star Wars as sci-fi, that was an error. It's just fantasy with space paint slathered over it. I stand by my other points.
These women are in incredibly normal outfits lol. Theres no cleavage. You can tell the breasts are there but thats because women have breasts believe it or not.
Yeah I would say the content itself isn't horny but this particular art style gives off a lot of horny energy. I'm willing to bet this artist has drawn lewd stuff.
edit: Yep I was right lol. The artist is @loopsieart on twitter who has "NSFW Digital Artist" in her bio. CW lewd stuff if you look her up.
She does good work! The woman and bear in the woods sharing a meal of a man is darkly hilarious, a nice commentary on the "would you rather run into a bear or a man in the woods?" thing.
But then I'm a huge fan of both Oglaf and the even hornier I Roved Out In Search Of Truth And Love, so maybe I'm already primed to enjoy her work.
It was about whether the above was hornyposting, I think.
If good art of adult women wearing clothing that would be perfectly acceptable in most casual settings is horny posting and is wrong, then I don't wanna be right. I've seen more scandalous poses and outfits in PG-rated movies.
As Hexbear's resident appointed joyless scold:
this phrasing implies there is only one appointed joyless scold. we have tons
We have many appointed scolds and many joyless scolds. But only UlyssesT embodies both qualities
Yeah. I had to go through a vetting process to be appointed officially joyless. It involved someone calling me that when I criticized the Gambo treats.
Like I said, meticulous vetting process.
Did any of them show up to this thread and put down a
sign yet?
I don't think they're as numerous as you're saying.
I have arrived.
Well, now that you're here, fire some shots!
As usual it's a sci-fi movie with no sense of scale. A million soldiers is enough to conquer maybe a small country on Earth. In the Star Wars universe, assuming their galaxy is about the size of the Milky Way and they have the same approximate rate of planet formation, that's enough clones for a single security guard to cover roughly about 100,000 planets.
Update, I made a mistake, I described Star Wars as sci-fi, that was an error. It's just fantasy with space paint slathered over it. I stand by my other points.
So true. But maybe they've got lots of proxies and vassals? Someone's got to be the Israel of Star Wars.
Also I guess the implication is that the supply is near infinite, on a larger timeframe. I don't know, star wars doesn't make any fucking sense.
Star Wars fell into the "must explain everything" trap, mostly due to fan demand. Nothing is permitted to be left open to imagination anymore, as the RLM crew well knows.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Units of what, citizen?
quarts
volcel police BTFO
I just cranked my hog in front of you and rode away to tell the tale
Puns aren't a crime.
spoiler
Yet.
When puns are outlawed, only outlaws have puns.
Tom Myerrrrrrs
a comediiiaaaaaaan
relevant: https://youtu.be/mBpVHdWd8J4
Everyone who thought this was hornyposting was just telling on themselves
Officer, arrest me
This is why
joined the 
; just showing up caused struggle sessions before that.
There are people here who thought drawings of young women in spring attire is hornyposting.
I do think its hornyposting, but also my barometer for such things is way off, since I'm ace.
Mostly, I hate the trope of 'lets just draw X, but all hot young (usually anime, though not here) women'
(but also, I usually don't comment either way, just ignore and possibly block user)
I mean it is a little bit.
These women are in incredibly normal outfits lol. Theres no cleavage. You can tell the breasts are there but thats because women have breasts believe it or not.
I think there is just a base level of horniness that goes into drawing "thing/concept but young attractive woman".
Yeah I would say the content itself isn't horny but this particular art style gives off a lot of horny energy. I'm willing to bet this artist has drawn lewd stuff.
edit: Yep I was right lol. The artist is @loopsieart on twitter who has "NSFW Digital Artist" in her bio. CW lewd stuff if you look her up.
This is the artist fwiw: https://x.com/loopsieart (CW: not NSFW exactly but some stuff is a little lewd-ish)
She also does cool stuff like this one lol:
New emote just dropped. Someone also needs to cut out the
bubble out separately too so much use in that lol.
@WhyEssEff@hexbear.net
Please
She does good work! The woman and bear in the woods sharing a meal of a man is darkly hilarious, a nice commentary on the "would you rather run into a bear or a man in the woods?" thing.
But then I'm a huge fan of both Oglaf and the even hornier I Roved Out In Search Of Truth And Love, so maybe I'm already primed to enjoy her work.
You are 100% right.
correct or not, every accusation of hornyposting is a confession