Original post here: https://hexbear.net/post/3856299?scrollToComments=false

I think we have a general path forward based on community feedback. "We see you, we hear you!"

I went ahead and unpinned the old post. I'm pinning this one for now and will edit this post when I wake up from eepy time. I had a very mid week and have no particular alarm set so be on look out. Love y'all and I'm amped for my first announcement post since coming back. :)

  • replaceable [he/him]
    ·
    4 days ago

    Some users think posting is praxis and that hexbear should be the headquarters of the revolutionary vanguard.

    no one is thinking that, no one is forcing you to make effortposts, if you want to just call someone dumb you have c/gossip for that, what we are merely doing is forbidding low-effort dunking on private people, which we think is toxic and boring

    • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
      ·
      4 days ago

      which we think is toxic and boring

      Who exactly is "we", and why should what you think matter to the rest of us?

      • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]
        ·
        4 days ago

        Especially when you are not being forced to be the mod of a comm and can simply not engage with or even see the content VIA THE INTENTIONAL DESIGN OF THE SITE.

        Feels like we just had a struggle session over somebody getting annoyed that when they jumped in the pool, they got wet.

    • REgon [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Fuck off you dork. I'm pretty obviously being hyperbolic to underline a point in that sentence.
      You're still being a dismissive shitheel who fails to engage with the users who have put forth well-reasoned arguments for why dunking is not toxic. You continuing to repeat "it's toxic" like some fucked up parrot does not make it so.
      If it's boring, maybe don't be a mod of the comm you massive dipshit. Just block it, it's actually really easy. There's tons of comms I don't interact with, because I don't find them interesting. You are a fantastic example of the attitude I'm talking about.

      Now I'm gonna become the parrot and repeat myself, but it's pretty fucking telling that all the shitheels who cry about "toxicity in the dunk tank" have been massive assholes throughout this entire thing. If this was about toxicity, one would think you of all people would be less of a turd when you're interacting with other people, even people who dares to gasp disagree with you. Do some fucking self-crit you bug

      edit: "we think" is obviously not everybody. Stop hiding behind a general vague group.

      • replaceable [he/him]
        ·
        4 days ago

        I did not engage with those arguments because i did not find them convincing, all they boil down to is that its cathartic and "fun", but i fail to see why the targets must be other common people for it to be cathartic and "fun"

        • Tomboymoder [she/her, pup/pup's]
          ·
          4 days ago

          If I go to work and my coworker is being a bigoted asshole conspiracy weirdo I am gonna vent about it when I get home to my partner.
          I don’t care how much of a “common man” he is.

          • REgon [they/them]
            ·
            4 days ago

            NOOO VENTING TO YOUR PARTNER ISN'T PRODUCTIVE YOU HAVE TO PRODUCE VALUE ALL THE TIME I AM A SOCIALIST AND YOU ARE WHITE AND CIS AND HET AND CHAUVINIST AND TOXIC

        • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think it’s clear that plenty of people here, evidently at least a plurality, find these posts to be cathartic and "fun", so why should you and a handful of people disagreeing have any impact on why people shouldn’t get to have catharsis and fun?

          Essentially, why are you right other than you think you are?

        • iByteABit [comrade/them]
          ·
          4 days ago

          The "targets" don't even know we're talking about them. In the off chance that someone sees a post on the comm and decides to go dunk on some fascist, I'd say it's deserved, we should not take any actions to protect fascists from having their feelings hurt.

          • replaceable [he/him]
            ·
            4 days ago

            The purpose of those changes is not to protect the nameless chuds, but to make the content better and less toxic

            • Kuori [she/her]
              ·
              4 days ago

              okay but how do we make you better and less toxic

              genuinely

                • Kuori [she/her]
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  naw listen, when someone whose entire online life is a tsunami of toxicity tells you that you're sucking shit i really do think it's wisest to at least consider the possibility that you may not have the clearest view of your own actions

                  let me rephrase. i don't want to say you are toxic. but you are definitely being toxic. if you don't want to claim that (i think you should) then you are at very least being...i guess deeply disrespectful? it's unpleasant, is what i am trying to get at. there should not be this level of hostility between the people running the show and the rest of us. i don't think it's natural. i also don't think it's something we the userbase are responsible for kicking off (at least in this instance).

                  shrug-outta-hecks js

                  • replaceable [he/him]
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    you will have to be more specific, in what way was i disrespectful?

                    • Kuori [she/her]
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      4 days ago

                      alright, i'll play along.

                      i think the way you've comported yourself in general during this event positively reeks of disdain: for the userbase, their interests and desires, and for the effort they have expended trying to communicate such with you.*

                      you should be able to understand that replying to long, considered posts with terse statements of dismissal and apparent disinterest is, if nothing else, deeply rude behavior. it's the equivalent of responding to someone's impassioned monologue with "okay". at best they will feel stupid for trying to talk to you at all. it's flatly not the sort of behavior you extend towards someone you respect on any level.

                      *i know this isn't equivalent to the effort of upkeeping and running the site. i am keeping that in mind during this critique.

                        • Kuori [she/her]
                          ·
                          4 days ago

                          lmao i genuinely cannot tell if this is an example of the behavior i discussed or if it's just an amusing coincidence but i will take it in good faith and offer some advice in kind: if you feel that your time here has embittered you towards the userbase, the site culture, or your duties as a moderator, i really do think you should give consideration to either taking a break from moderating or the site as a whole. i say this with no hostility. you folks put in a lot of labor to keep the site usable and we all appreciate that. and the key word there really is labor. i'm sure monitoring the community that is simultaneously the most active and the most likely to contain deeply emotionally damaging/draining rhetoric is not easy, to say nothing of the drama it stirs up with the other, lesser instances.

                          you should not be spending your limited free time in this life doing something that you hate.

                    • Venat [he/him, any]
                      ·
                      4 days ago

                      I would also like to see more effort posts instead of reddit tier screenshots and gotchas. I'd like to know - have it spelled out for me, rather - how to discuss and process why liberal and reactionary talking points and axioms are false and ineffective. but I think understanding the criticisms against liberals and reactionaries doesn't come from internet posts or youtube essays, but from reading and learning.

                      And then coming to the site to share that common understanding of reality via the leftist lens, and then exercise levity over that reality as we face our spectrum of competency and power(lessness) in that reality.

                      I've learned that the catharsis is the point. It's a necessary intellectual cultivation of enduring in reality and acting upon reality.

                      It'd be fair to say that you, I, and perhaps all of us would like to see that catharsis go somewhere. Yet we just won't see it go from Hexbear -> ??? - > socialist activism, community organizing, volunteering, etc.

                      The unknown factor are the material conditions and motivations of people to put their time and energy in the material world; the levity gleaned here is the point of the site, and as a community this is what its members make of it. It isn't inherently a bad thing.

                      Let people have their fun. It isn't meaningless, fruitless, or useless just because it does not interest you or I.

                      • Venat [he/him, any]
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        4 days ago

                        Dolores Umbridge was more hated among the Harry Potter fanbase than Voldemort.

                        What makes the distinction between mockery of public officials and petty trolls on the internet (twitter, reddit, lemmy) is that often our fellow proleterians are also our tormentors. In the news, Israeli football vandals picked fights, defaced properties, and chanted genocidal and racist rants. This behavior is echoed on the bottom of Israeli society and validated by the top; this behavior (not just Israeli racism but bigotry/oppression in general) is also echoed in Western states by core constituencies of its dominant population, and validated through willful ignorance and patronizing liberalism.

                        I think our problem here is that we've seen a lot of this content. So much so that it also gets grating.

                        But not everything is for everyone.

        • REgon [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Ah is this the fabled improved rhetoric? Or is this your idea of not being dismissive and toxic?
          "I didn't engage with the arguments because I didn't agree with them" amerikkka-clap
          Fuck off, seriously. Do some self crit.

          • "Oh I don't like this thing, so therefore it's not good." Narc mindset.
          • You're also changing your reasoning. Before it was that targeting non-powerful people "had no impact" lol. Now it' that you feel sorry for some chud who will never see us laughing at them?
          • Also you're presenting it as a "has to". It doesn't have to target "other common people", which is a very loaded phrasing, but it can.
          • What happened to it being unhealthy? Or do you realise how stupid that sounds, so you excluded it. That doesn't make sense though, since that would have required you engaged with the arguments.

          Why are you modding the dunk tank? Why take the job if you hate it?

          edit: If you can't even be arsed to put in basic effort when having an argument, how can you expect this site to be one that fosters effortposts?

          • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
            ·
            4 days ago

            Time for tone policing. Take your strongly worded words in your replies to replaceable down by like 30 to 50 hogs.

            Some of the people that have Ms or As next to their names are gonna need having strong words of their own so I'd suggest not getting too tilted.

            • REgon [they/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              rat-salute-2
              Thanks for giving me a warning, I appreciate it. I got too heated and treated an annoying dork like a genocide-apologising lib. It was too much.

        • Hexboare [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          i fail to see why the targets must be other common people for it to be cathartic and "fun"

          You've read the posts though right? like objectively there are some pretty bad fucking people getting represented in that content

          • replaceable [he/him]
            ·
            4 days ago

            Those may be people that say terrible things but that doesnt matter, if we dont know their identity, most likely they are just another prole and their words are just as inconsequential as mine or yours

            • tocopherol [any]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              The words of a random chud might not be consequential in itself, but I think it's important to take note of what kind of rhetoric is going around chud circles and counter it and the dunking helps that. Maybe people are getting riled up or mad because of it but it seems like many of us don't see it that way. The dunk tank posts do not rile me or make me mad in general, it gives me a view into a culture I don't interact with and the comments allow discussion of how these mindsets come into being, and how to counter it.

              • replaceable [he/him]
                ·
                4 days ago

                it's important to take note of what kind of rhetoric is going around chud circles and counter it

                c/counterpropaganda is precisely for that

        • m532 [she/her]
          ·
          4 days ago

          Westerners are not members of the global proletariat, they are our enemies

      • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
        ·
        4 days ago

        Turns out that comm is cool and good because the most prolific poster over there is a good friend of the admins.

        Funny how that works.

        • REgon [they/them]
          ·
          4 days ago

          How does removing the place where people go to do a thing, remove their ability to go to the place and do a thing? Are you 12? Children don't learn how action and consequence are linked until age 13. It would eplain a lot of your behaviour if you were a tween

          • replaceable [he/him]
            ·
            4 days ago

            But you can still do functionally the same thing in c/gossip just not at the same people

            • REgon [they/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Then it's not functionally the same thing, dipshit

              We're now at the point in the argument where you are trying to say "it doesn't even matter!" because all your other pathetic excuses have been hollowed out. The fact that you're a mod is sad, the fact that you haven't had the presence of mind to step down is fucking pathetic.
              I know a lot of you people can't handle dissent and get irrationally angry when people disagree with you or like things you don't enjoy, but grow up. YOU and YOUR ACTIONS are unhealthy for the site culture. YOUR BEHAVIOUR is toxic. YOU are the problem. Do some self-crit. Take a step back and ask yourself some questions about why you feel the way you feel about these things.

              If you don't enjoy what the site is, then don't participate in it. This is not your personal project, but somethig a lot of people build and shape together. The site culture is ever-changing and that is an organic process. Being a mad little pissbaby because people enjoy things you don't, isn't organic, it's actually not even normal. The things YOU and YOUR clique is doing is killing the site. I know you're deluding yourself into thinking if you just get rid of [group] then this site will finally become good. The site is fine, you're the issue, the rot is inside you. You will never enjoy it, because you will always encounter people who disagree with you or dissent with your opinion or call you out for being a dipshit or enjoy things you don't enjoy. Even things you find troubesome in some way.
              In the end this is just a niche leftist webforum, the worst case is permanent stalin-gun-1logout but I'd be sad to see this community go. Especially if it's killed because of some dork like you.

              • replaceable [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Im not saying it doesnt matter, you accuse the mod team of taking away your "fun", so im pointing out you can still have "fun", was dunking on nobodies your only source of fun?

                • REgon [they/them]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  jfc I am becoming a broken record. Is this your idea of durable rhetoric? Is this your idea of non-toxicity? You are still doing basic debatebrodismissiveness as well as throwing out sad attempts at turning this into a personal mental health issue. Childish. Log out, never log on again until you've learned to handle people disagreeing with you.
                  I haven't actually "accused the mod team of taking away my fun" great reading ability! If you're gonna try to go down that path, actually engage with the specific things I am saying, instead of what you'd like me to be saying.

                  edit: And we are now at the point in the argument where you try to move the discussion to something else, because you've exhausted the current one. This is why you are trying to make it about me. Loser.

                  • replaceable [he/him]
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    u/TerribleHands literally asked

                    Why do you have to ruin other people's fun?

                        • REgon [they/them]
                          ·
                          4 days ago

                          We clearly weren't you hack

                          But hey you've managed to change the discussion to one you're actually comfortable in: Something completely meaningless! Good for you that we are no longer talking about the many ways you've showed your ass, the many faults in your reasoning, the fact you're moderating something you dislike like an absolute moron, or any of that stuff, we're instead having a pointless argument about what we were arguing about arguing about. joker-amerikkklap Once again, do some self crit. The fact you're a mod is pathetic

            • Esoteir [he/him]
              ·
              4 days ago

              so you can do functionally the same thing just not functionally the same thing, gotcha, makes sense

              pooh-wtf

              • replaceable [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                it is functionally the same thing, you can still "dunk" on people, they just have to be public figures, that does not in any way diminish the "fun" in it does it?

                • REgon [they/them]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Then it's not functionally the same thing, dipshit.

                  that does not in any way diminish the "fun" in it does it?

                  Jesus christ you are an insufferable debatebro. Had any normal user done what you did, they'd been banned. Despite you being a condescending smuglord and me therefore treating you like one, it's still probably only me who's gonna catch flak once the rest of your clique wakes up and you can cry to them about it. Eat shit.

                • Esoteir [he/him]
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  so you can't dunk on the same people as before, they have to be public figures now?

                  • replaceable [he/him]
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    yes, according to you guys the purpose of dunking is for it to be fun and cathartic, it still is if the dunking is on public figures , therefore it is functionally the same

                    • Esoteir [he/him]
                      ·
                      4 days ago

                      so for someone that finds dunking fun and cathartic, can they still perform the function of dunking on someone who isn't a public figure in c/gossip?

                            • Esoteir [he/him]
                              ·
                              4 days ago

                              so it's not functionally the same in all senses?

                              • replaceable [he/him]
                                ·
                                4 days ago

                                thats what functionally same means, that its not literally same

                                • Esoteir [he/him]
                                  ·
                                  4 days ago

                                  okay so if you're going into semantics, can we agree that the term "functionally the same" means two things that have the same function?

                                    • Esoteir [he/him]
                                      ·
                                      4 days ago

                                      okay cool, now could users perform the function of dunking people who weren't public figures on the_dunk_tank?

                                        • Esoteir [he/him]
                                          ·
                                          4 days ago

                                          does rule 8 contain this text: "Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this."?

                                          • replaceable [he/him]
                                            ·
                                            4 days ago

                                            yes, but we barely if ever saw any posts that used this exception

                                            • Esoteir [he/him]
                                              ·
                                              4 days ago

                                              But under that exception, it would be allowed for someone to post a bad take from comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views yes?

                                                • Esoteir [he/him]
                                                  ·
                                                  4 days ago

                                                  okay, with that exception in mind, could users perform the function of dunking people who weren't public figures on the_dunk_tank?

                                                    • Esoteir [he/him]
                                                      ·
                                                      4 days ago

                                                      and the_dunk_tank and c/gossip have the same rules, aside from rule 8 where it now also links to counterpropaganda, correct?

                                                      • replaceable [he/him]
                                                        ·
                                                        4 days ago

                                                        Those were inattentively copied from the_dunk_tank, i removed reference to that rule 8 in c/gossip now, now instead the rule is just that subjects of a post must be a public person

                                                        • Esoteir [he/him]
                                                          ·
                                                          4 days ago

                                                          ah gotcha, it's good to set the rules up clearly

                                                          so now there is no exception for posting private figures on c/gossip, right?

                                                            • Esoteir [he/him]
                                                              ·
                                                              4 days ago

                                                              and the_dunk_tank held the function of providing a place where users could post a bad take from comments/posts made by a private person that have low amounts of upvotes/likes/views, provided that private person made that post or comment on other instances that are accessible from hexbear, yes?

                    • REgon [they/them]
                      ·
                      4 days ago

                      Go back to reddit, oh my god you are an insufferable lib smuglord.
                      You expect others - the site culture at large - to move towards one focused on effortposts and development of rhetoric, yet you yourself cant even be fucking arsed to have basic decency. You can't even be arsed to engage with the arguments, not even in good faith, but just at all. Being a reductive dipshit is sad loser behaviour, go kiss a worm.

                        • REgon [they/them]
                          ·
                          4 days ago

                          Lol did you get tired of getting dunked on on your main? It's really funny how you can feel this strongly, but be too much of a dweeb to user your account for it

                          Anyway thanks for the 30$ Please keep the accounts coming, I've got more bets lined up lol

                        • REgon [they/them]
                          ·
                          edit-2
                          4 days ago

                          That is incredibly hilarious coming from you
                          People disagreeing with you makes you so mad that you instantly resort to misgendering lol. Seriously do some self-crit. People dissenting shouldn't result in you freaking out like this lol