Ukraine’s highest profile combat unit is seeking English-speaking recruits at a time when the impending presidency of Donald Trump means that Kyiv is expected to come under intense pressure on the battlefield.
Azov, a volunteer brigade whose decade-old nationalist origins have made it a target of Russian propaganda, plans to form an international battalion to boost its numbers as Ukraine heads into a fourth year of full-scale war.
The unit commander, whose call sign is Karl, said Azov largely hoped to recruit people with military experience “because Ukraine is smaller than Russia” and needs all the help it can get in a struggle of international significance.
“We are fighting to not let Russia become closer to Europe,” he said, arguing that if Ukraine were to fall, Moscow would go on to threaten Poland, the Baltic states and other nations, some of whom were smaller than Ukraine.
Fifteen Britons, acting as soldiers or volunteer workers, have been killed since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, including two whose deaths have been announced this month: the frontline medic Jordan Maclachlan, 26, from Scotland and the former British Army soldier Jake Waddington, 34, a member of the International Legion.
They are among a steady flow of Britons and other westerners who have joined Ukraine’s armed forces in a near three-year conflict that, as of early December, had claimed the lives of 43,000 Ukrainian soldiers and, according to intelligence estimates, roughly three times as many Russians.
Travelling to Ukraine to fight in its armed forces is not illegal, unless you are a member of the UK armed forces, though it is not encouraged. In the early stages of the war, the then defence secretary Ben Wallace said Britons without military training would be of little use to Ukraine’s military.
Non-Ukrainians seeking to join Azov have to complete a recruitment process, including interviews in Kyiv, which Karl said includes a psychological assessment “and a polygraph test, to check they do not work undercover for Russian special forces”.
Initial training will last two to three months, even for those with military experience, in groups of about 80 to reflect the realities of the Ukrainian battlefield, where there is a heavy use of drones and artillery. “The training of some soldiers in Europe hasn’t changed much since the second world war,” Karl said.
After training, those willing to stay on are expected to join infantry assault units. Karl acknowledged that recruits would eventually be placed in dangerous situations. “The reality can be rather bad, it’s a war,” the commander said.
Azov is now operating near Toretsk in the east of Ukraine, a ruined town split between both sides’ armies. The situation across the entire front is expected to worsen for Ukraine because Trump is expected to curtail or cut the flow of US military aid while trying to end the conflict.
Questions have been raised in the past about the effectiveness of the International Legion, the dedicated unit for foreign fighters at the start of the war, with accusations of corruption and poor leadership leading to heavy casualties.
However, Azov is one of the most popular units for Ukrainians to join, even as the willingness of civilians to join the military has dropped. It is considered to be better run than other brigades and is seen as a tenacious defender of Ukraine, having fought in a last stand in Mariupol in 2022.
The brigade began life as a volunteer militia fighting Russian-backed separatists in 2014, and some of its leaders held ultra-nationalistic and far right views. Russia designated it a terror group in 2022, and for several years the US refused to supply it arms directly.
However, Azov has changed over a continuous decade of fighting. In the summer, a US review led to the end of the weapons ban, concluding the unit had not committed any human rights violations. At the time, Russia accused Washington of being willing to “flirt with neo-Nazis”, comments Azov members dismiss as propaganda.
“Our deeds in Mariupol changed a lot,” Karl said. In May 2022, the brigade was surrounded at the Azovstal plant, and nearly 2,500 put down their arms after running out of ammunition. An estimated 900 are still held prisoner in Russia.
Azov, a volunteer brigade whose decade-old nationalist origins have made it a target of Russian propaganda,
The Russians are saying that they're outright Nazis because they're outright Nazis; nevertheless,
general question here, kind of like in the USA and other settler colonies, is it even possible to be a nationalist in Ukraine and not go into nazi territory? like, is there even anyone who they can point to that isnt a nazi like bandera?
There was that lady who holds the world record in sniping Nazis. Wasn't she Ukrainian?
i guess they could try and twist her into a symbol of Ukrainian nationalism, except it would be very difficult to do so if you remain anti-communist because she was a proud USSR citizen
She was born in what is today Ukraine, but her family was from Petersburg, where she also lived after war (Leningrad), and then in Moscow. I don't think she ever considered herself Ukrainian in terms of nationality, especially that she was a real communist who always praised USSR as a whole.
The Allies' highest scoring ace in the WW2 Ivan Kozhedub was 100% Ukrainian and post-2014 Ukraine renamed everything that was named after him and destroyed his memorials, because he was an outspoken communist.
They also point out to the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who thought of themselves as nobility and disdained Ruthenian peasants (ancestors of modern Ukrainians), they were also absolute blight on the land and its inhabitants (Later they got resettled by Russia to the Kuban region where they became way less horrible even to the point of being the % most prorevolutionary and procommunist Cossack group during Civil War and WW2).
Also to the Kievan Rus, which was about as Ukrainian as the ancient Gauls are to modern French.
Generally is just typical nationalist thing because the real roots of the modern nation, during of general European XIX century nationalist wave are not even very unique, but the raging chauvinists always need some heroic myths at their origin.
they became way less horrible
Not really, they were still very bad both to Caucasian people and to Russian/Ukrainian peasants.
being the % most prorevolutionary and procommunist Cossack group during Civil War and WW2).
The most procommunist Cossack group would be actually Transbaikal cossacks, who played a significant role in the Far East and held a council that issued a resolution on abolition of Cossack estate as a relic of feudalism.
Agree they were still horrible as every Cossacks group but still less than in Ukraine. Also the conquest of Crimean Khanate and partition of Poland improved situation for peasants too.
Transbaikal cossacks
Didn't they fought for Bloody Baron Ungern?
There were some small groups under Ungern, Semenov and Annenkov, but most of them supported (or joined) Bolshevik guerillas. In comparison, more than half of Kuban cossacks supported Whites.
"Left-wing" media outlet The Guardian whitewashing literal Nazis.
50% of that website is taken up by them begging for money like fucken Wikipedia these days. Except they run fucking ads lol
Azov, a volunteer brigade whose decade-old nationalist origins have made it a target of Russian propaganda
Please take all the fash dipshits you can and throw them in the meat grinder. Sounds absolutely great.
They are among a steady flow of Britons and other westerners who have joined Ukraine’s armed forces in a near three-year conflict that, as of early December, had claimed the lives of 43,000 Ukrainian soldiers and, according to intelligence estimates, roughly three times as many Russians.
Lmao 🤣
So much cope. 43,000!!!
That’s why the Nazis are dragging men out of grocery stores and gyms right, and why every article is dooming about Ukraine’s “acute manpower shortage”. Because of 43,000 casualties
Zelensky just said Ukraine have 980000 strong armed forces, which is almost certainly an exaggeration, but a loss of 43000 in three years of war would be completely insignificant to such a force.
4-5% casualties is completely insignificant? I guess I don’t know much about war lol
5% of casualties in 3 year regular peer war on over 1000km front with abundant usage of artillery, missiles and drones is completely negligible. Real Ukrainian losses are certainly above 100% of their pre war numbers, maybe even more.
Yeah actual Ukrainian losses are probably around 300k dead and over 1 million casualties
Getting 5 billion updoots for going to r/Russia and posting "Slava ukrainia" like the bravest poster
I saw the headline this morning. Thought for a split second "I wonder which unit the Guardian considers high profile? I bet it's not Azov because they'd just name that..." Then I realized a split second later that they absolutely would hide the name in the story to avoid immediate associations without having all the "context" about Azov's "not a nazi group anymore" around it.
I opened the article, Azov was the first word I saw. Then I closed it in dosgust. Now you posted the text and I feel like I could've guessed every sentence without reading it lol
The unit commander, whose call sign is Karl, said Azov largely hoped to recruit people with military experience “because Ukraine is smaller than Russia” and needs all the help it can get in a struggle of international significance.
“We are fighting to not let Russia become closer to Europe,” he said, arguing that if Ukraine were to fall, Moscow would go on to threaten Poland, the Baltic states and other nations, some of whom were smaller than Ukraine.
It is only my impression or nazis gets even more stupid and infantile with the passage of time
as of early December, had claimed the lives of 43,000 Ukrainian soldiers
🤦♂️ I won't even quote more, this is one of the dredgest articles ever.
Can someone with more knowledge make a couterpropaganda post about this? It would be a great resource.