• BeamBrain [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    When young people actually showed up to vote for a candidate we like, they called us racist misogynist privileged Berniebros.

    • anthm17 [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Young people showed up in 2018 and we didn't even get meaningful obstruction of the GOP agenda.

          • Homestar440 [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            I've seen this exchange a bunch of times, and I think it's interesting. At first blush, it seems maddeningly circular. Basically, if voting could effect change, those in power wouldn't allow voting. This implies that the presence of electoral mischief is proof of the efficacy of voting. Meaning, the more voter suppression or fraud you see, the more powerful voting must be. You can guess where this kind of shit ends up, and yes, I have literally seen a lib suggest voting out electronic voting machines because the vote totals can't be trusted.

            The solution is simple, instead of "if voting mattered they'd fuck with voting" it should be "voting doesn't matter because they fuck with voting." Before it was gerrymandering, closing polling places and hacking voting machines it was property ownership and race requirements, it's just the modern way of ensuring the ruling class gets it preferred outcome.

            • Zhenya [none/use name]
              ·
              4 years ago

              Well yeah electoralism can never be the thing because, of course, the ruling class can easily fuck with it. No argument there. I just disagree that it can't change anything. You can overwhelm their mechanisms and force an unwanted result, OR force them into a situation where an angry populace knows damn well who won and it isn't who they say won, you can distract and force them to waste resources on the front, it is certainly a psychic plain on which the struggle can be waged, even if it's one designed to lean in their direction.

              It just can't be THE ONLY thing, ofc. Because then Bernie happens. They just turboload all their resources into election fuckery and since they aren't being pressured on any other front, it works.

        • cracksmoke2020 [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 years ago

          Voting won't get us socialism, but it certainly could get us a number of major social democratic programs. It happened in the past.

          • kimilsungist [they/them]
            ·
            4 years ago

            the past was when the communist party was literally mainstream, and everyone was in a union. so good luck

      • cracksmoke2020 [none/use name]
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 years ago

        Young people showing up in the general doesn't mean shit, you need young people to show up to primaries to vote in progressives. If meaningful numbers of incumbents are losing seats to people more left wing than them, they will move to the left to keep their seats.

        • Homestar440 [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          No, they will put more money and resources into strengthening propaganda and barriers to entry, liberals can't move left because they can't, by definition, oppose capitalism

          • cracksmoke2020 [none/use name]
            ·
            4 years ago

            Most American politicians have virtually no hardline beliefs of their own, all they care about is power for their team.

            A liberal ideologue like the folks from /r/neoliberal (and truthfully Joe Biden fits the bill here so idk why anyone says he can be pushed left) are someone you need to defeat in the electoral arena, a political hack like Kamala Harris will support whatever she needs to support to keep getting elected and moving upwards, be that a right wing policy like more police or a left wing one like Medicare for all.

            I'm not talking about implementing socialism in full, that was never going to happen from electoral politics, but you can absolutely get major social democratic reforms this way.

            Ths abolition of slavery, social security, to Medicare and the civil rights act, every single big sweeping legislative reform in the countries history happened because of groundswell protests that forced the hand of political hack liberal politicians. Sure it's better if you get one of your own in, but even Bernie would've needed the same sort of protest movements to force the hands of other liberals.

    • cracksmoke2020 [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 years ago

      Except young people didn't actually show up in big numbers for Bernie. It was still only like 30% turnout.

  • thelasthoxhaist [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    PSL will cater to the left votes more that any other party, plus they have the better name

    • dismal
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      deleted by creator

    • JayTwo [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      I'd rather my revolutionary socialist party didn't share an acronym with the most basic drink of fall, but beggars can't be choosers, I guess.

  • Lovely_sombrero [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    What candidate do young people really like? Bernie Sanders?

    (votes for Biden)

    You know, I just hope that young people get the candidate that they want really soon!

  • LangdonAlger [any]
    ·
    4 years ago

    WHAT DOES THIS ASSHOLE THINK THE BERNIE CAMPAIGN WAS FUCK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

  • Sushi_Desires
    ·
    4 years ago

    Oh yeah it's not like people were literally barred from voting when the DNC closed college campus polling places

  • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]
    ·
    4 years ago

    slams down Yale study that says the wants of the public in the US do not become policy but the wants of the rich and corporations do Even your liberal academics admit it!

  • Liberalism [he/him,they/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    This but voting third party/spoiling tbh. It works if you actively refuse to comply in a way that can't be mistaken for apathy.