People bully him over his accent and clothing all the time on here, and he's referencing that in these tweets.
People don't really bully him over his take on Marxism, anyway; that would require reading his take and attempting to address it, not just dismissing anything critical of Marxism out of hand. Shitting on fellow leftists is not going to get us anywhere.
Oh, well I mean people absolutely make fun of his clothes and accent, just like people make fun of Ben Shapiro's voice and height. Whether or not that's OK, the reason for it is not because of NJR's clothes/accent, nor is it because of Ben Shapiro's voice/height. Those are just low hanging fruit to make fun of someone people don't like for other reasons. That's what I meant.
Is your position here that people are wrong to dislike NJR, or is it that people shouldn't mock someone for superficial traits that aren't inherently bad, even if they think that person sucks? Or do you think that people here are literally only making fun of NJR because of his appearance/accent/whatever?
people absolutely make fun of his clothes and accent, just like people make fun of Ben Shapiro’s voice and height
My position is that we shouldn't shit on leftists the way we shit on chuds. We should be far more generous with people we agree with on 90% of issues, even if we disagree strongly with some of their takes. There's no fucking way we're going to build any sort of leftist movement in the United States if we're all eager to shit on each other over petty things at the drop of a hat.
That's not treating him like Ben Shapiro. The point was that when people here make fun of trivial bullshit like appearances here, the reason they do it is because they dislike the person's politics, and Shapiro is just a common example of that.
But yeah, I don't really disagree with you. NJR has some bad takes but the US is probably never going to have a viable leftist movement that is too sectarian to see him as an ally. People seem to think that because communist movements a century ago in another continent were powerful enough to not always ally reformist socialists and instead fight against them, that we should do the same now.
Leftists express much more contempt when making fun of Shapiro. Just because you ridicule 2 different people doesn't mean you are treating them the same.
You're acting as though his clothes and his accent aren't both affectations he has adopted later in life. It's not like he popped out of the womb wearing a porkpie hat. It's perfectly reasonable to bully a self-proclaimed socialist for adopting the mannerisms of an early 20th century British dandy, especially if he's in any way attempting to be a public face for any sort of ideological project.
perfectly reasonable to bully a self-proclaimed socialist for adopting the mannerisms of an early 20th century British dandy, especially if he’s in any way attempting to be a public face for any sort of ideological project.
I was a leftist but then I saw that Nathan J Robinson dresses funny so I had no choice but to abandon leftism.
Demanding people conform to some social construct of "normalcy", real progressive shit. All about self-expression and identity except when it comes to clothes because reasons?
I care much more about his dogshit takes on Marx than I ever will about whatever the fuck he chooses to wear.
he could dress and speak the exact same way and if he had a better worldview people wouldn't tease him about it. his shit takes opens up the shallow type insults because it can be funny. i kind of feel bad, like he's missing the point but whatever.
oh, well if he's from sarasota he should definitely be dressed as a flamingo but like, one that really stanned guy harvey and wears a sperry on the one foot that touches the ground
I had a professor who grew up in Southern California. He talked in a very distinctive accent, because his mom was British but he didn't grow up in London. All of his students would joke about what the hell his accent was. I worked with a woman from Houston who had a similar accent for similar reasons, and who got similar comments on her accent.
Certainly this tweet is proof positive that his mom is calling him out for just one day waking up at 26 and deciding to pretend to be British. There's no possible way it could be some light family ribbing over the type of unusual accent tons of people have. The best way to build left unity is to assume the worst of our fellow leftists, even over petty shit, and dunk on them like middle schoolers. See you in Central Park, everyone, I'm sure we're almost there.
The best way to build left unity is to never say anything mean about another leftist's choices ever.
This is why gamer conventions all smell like shit. A bunch of people who got bullied a bunch for being "different" swing in the complete opposite direction and decide that you can never call out anyone for any reason.
You wanna have a party of foppish dandies go off, but don't act like including them isn't a bigger turn off for everyone else.
The best way to build left unity is to never say anything mean about another leftist’s choices ever.
Did I say no criticism is allowed, ever?
And I don't buy the "oh he's a bad look for the left" bit because (1) it never acknowledges that starting an explicitly socialist magazine is really really good for the left, and (2) people revel in Zizek being unkempt and post that quote about Marx living a bohemian lifestyle all the time. No one pretends to care about that stuff for people they like.
just tearing down one of the most ubiquitous theoretical frameworks for leftism without decent alternatives is not good.
This is what I mean by not addressing his actual take. As I recall, his main issue is with the reverence afforded to Marx and his writings. He would prefer socialists in 2020 to re-write key texts for a modern audience instead of relying on 150-year-old tomes translated from German. Note that Lenin and Mao would agree with this -- they both wrote socialist texts adapted to their time and place instead of just reprinting Marx and telling everyone to read him. That's not tearing down Marxism as a theoretical framework; it's saying "let's update Marxism the way a modern physics textbook describes Newtonian physics in modern language, including subsequent theoretical developments."
And he's not just leveling this critique and then sitting on his ass. He wrote a book doing exactly what I described, he runs a socialist magazine, and he's written extensively on how Bernie-style policies make sense from a socialist perspective. I seriously don't get the hostility towards a guy who's so obviously trying to move us in the right direction.
“marx was too focused on a scientific materialist approach and not enough about the moral imperative”
No idea if he actually said this, but appealing to the morality of a country that for the past 75 years has taught its citizens that we're the moral police of the world is far from unreasonable. He certainly never says that materialism doesn't matter, either.
Lenin and Mao are juvenile now? Because they updated socialist literature in the exact way NJR talks about.
We're not dealing with holy texts. It's OK -- good, even -- to write about why socialism is good in a style that's easy for a modern audience to digest.
He dismisses Marx out of hand, just like he dismisses every AES. Then his favourite projects get overthrown because they weren’t brutal enough, and his takeaway is that Evo’s mistake was failing to sufficiently adhere to the ever-changing demands of the bourgeois system.
He’ll read screeds upon screeds of Jordan Peterson, but he won’t touch Marx.
I think people here are mostly bullying him over his takes on marx
People bully him over his accent and clothing all the time on here, and he's referencing that in these tweets.
People don't really bully him over his take on Marxism, anyway; that would require reading his take and attempting to address it, not just dismissing anything critical of Marxism out of hand. Shitting on fellow leftists is not going to get us anywhere.
Oh, well I mean people absolutely make fun of his clothes and accent, just like people make fun of Ben Shapiro's voice and height. Whether or not that's OK, the reason for it is not because of NJR's clothes/accent, nor is it because of Ben Shapiro's voice/height. Those are just low hanging fruit to make fun of someone people don't like for other reasons. That's what I meant.
It should set off alarm bells when you're treating a socialist like he's Ben Fucking Shapiro.
Nobody is doing that.
Is your position here that people are wrong to dislike NJR, or is it that people shouldn't mock someone for superficial traits that aren't inherently bad, even if they think that person sucks? Or do you think that people here are literally only making fun of NJR because of his appearance/accent/whatever?
You just said:
My position is that we shouldn't shit on leftists the way we shit on chuds. We should be far more generous with people we agree with on 90% of issues, even if we disagree strongly with some of their takes. There's no fucking way we're going to build any sort of leftist movement in the United States if we're all eager to shit on each other over petty things at the drop of a hat.
That's not treating him like Ben Shapiro. The point was that when people here make fun of trivial bullshit like appearances here, the reason they do it is because they dislike the person's politics, and Shapiro is just a common example of that.
But yeah, I don't really disagree with you. NJR has some bad takes but the US is probably never going to have a viable leftist movement that is too sectarian to see him as an ally. People seem to think that because communist movements a century ago in another continent were powerful enough to not always ally reformist socialists and instead fight against them, that we should do the same now.
Come on:
Leftists express much more contempt when making fun of Shapiro. Just because you ridicule 2 different people doesn't mean you are treating them the same.
I bully him about his clothes because of his takes on Marxism
You're acting as though his clothes and his accent aren't both affectations he has adopted later in life. It's not like he popped out of the womb wearing a porkpie hat. It's perfectly reasonable to bully a self-proclaimed socialist for adopting the mannerisms of an early 20th century British dandy, especially if he's in any way attempting to be a public face for any sort of ideological project.
The absolute state of the left smdh.
Awaiting the next great leftist pundit who smears himself in shit for his weekly vlog.
deleted by creator
The only true leftists have returned to monke
I was a leftist but then I saw that Nathan J Robinson dresses funny so I had no choice but to abandon leftism.
Demanding people conform to some social construct of "normalcy", real progressive shit. All about self-expression and identity except when it comes to clothes because reasons?
I care much more about his dogshit takes on Marx than I ever will about whatever the fuck he chooses to wear.
he could dress and speak the exact same way and if he had a better worldview people wouldn't tease him about it. his shit takes opens up the shallow type insults because it can be funny. i kind of feel bad, like he's missing the point but whatever.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
oh, well if he's from sarasota he should definitely be dressed as a flamingo but like, one that really stanned guy harvey and wears a sperry on the one foot that touches the ground
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Oh you know him?
I'm assuming his mom does: https://twitter.com/marlonettinger/status/1179963188818976776?lang=en
I had a professor who grew up in Southern California. He talked in a very distinctive accent, because his mom was British but he didn't grow up in London. All of his students would joke about what the hell his accent was. I worked with a woman from Houston who had a similar accent for similar reasons, and who got similar comments on her accent.
Certainly this tweet is proof positive that his mom is calling him out for just one day waking up at 26 and deciding to pretend to be British. There's no possible way it could be some light family ribbing over the type of unusual accent tons of people have. The best way to build left unity is to assume the worst of our fellow leftists, even over petty shit, and dunk on them like middle schoolers. See you in Central Park, everyone, I'm sure we're almost there.
The best way to build left unity is to never say anything mean about another leftist's choices ever.
This is why gamer conventions all smell like shit. A bunch of people who got bullied a bunch for being "different" swing in the complete opposite direction and decide that you can never call out anyone for any reason.
You wanna have a party of foppish dandies go off, but don't act like including them isn't a bigger turn off for everyone else.
Did I say no criticism is allowed, ever?
And I don't buy the "oh he's a bad look for the left" bit because (1) it never acknowledges that starting an explicitly socialist magazine is really really good for the left, and (2) people revel in Zizek being unkempt and post that quote about Marx living a bohemian lifestyle all the time. No one pretends to care about that stuff for people they like.
Zizek is unkempt in a way that normal people are unkempt.
deleted by creator
This is what I mean by not addressing his actual take. As I recall, his main issue is with the reverence afforded to Marx and his writings. He would prefer socialists in 2020 to re-write key texts for a modern audience instead of relying on 150-year-old tomes translated from German. Note that Lenin and Mao would agree with this -- they both wrote socialist texts adapted to their time and place instead of just reprinting Marx and telling everyone to read him. That's not tearing down Marxism as a theoretical framework; it's saying "let's update Marxism the way a modern physics textbook describes Newtonian physics in modern language, including subsequent theoretical developments."
And he's not just leveling this critique and then sitting on his ass. He wrote a book doing exactly what I described, he runs a socialist magazine, and he's written extensively on how Bernie-style policies make sense from a socialist perspective. I seriously don't get the hostility towards a guy who's so obviously trying to move us in the right direction.
No idea if he actually said this, but appealing to the morality of a country that for the past 75 years has taught its citizens that we're the moral police of the world is far from unreasonable. He certainly never says that materialism doesn't matter, either.
deleted by creator
Lenin and Mao are juvenile now? Because they updated socialist literature in the exact way NJR talks about.
We're not dealing with holy texts. It's OK -- good, even -- to write about why socialism is good in a style that's easy for a modern audience to digest.
The problem is he doesn’t have a take on Marx.
He dismisses Marx out of hand, just like he dismisses every AES. Then his favourite projects get overthrown because they weren’t brutal enough, and his takeaway is that Evo’s mistake was failing to sufficiently adhere to the ever-changing demands of the bourgeois system.
He’ll read screeds upon screeds of Jordan Peterson, but he won’t touch Marx.
Nah, it's definitely because he dresses like a flamingo and talks funny. Anti-fancylad action.
Which is silly, because they're ones who should be bullied for their takes on Marx.