• TossedAccount [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    These projects should be closely studied by anyone making the case for an ecosocialist GND, of the Hawkins variety more so than the watered-down AOC variety.

    • Snakechapman [any]
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 years ago

      Agreed. Stopping desertification is good. Greening a historical desert is maybe good. Posting picture of sand hillside and green hillside next to each other when they're obviously not the same hillside is bad.

  • CoralMarks [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    As long as they’re not wiping out desserts, I say keep going China.

    On a serious note, the articles themselves aren’t that bad, but the headlines are a pretty poor choice of words considering the topic.

      • Snakechapman [any]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Unverifyable clickbait is bad propaganda. Posting figures from peer reviewed articles showing these changes is good propaganda.

    • Snakechapman [any]
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 years ago

      https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ISPAr42.3.2127Y/abstract

      The effects are very slight

      • qublics [they/them,she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        So where exactly did you get this notion of "very slight"? Did you even read that article?
        Another more recent article also including 2017 data: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-78665-9

        If this argument is about "vanished form the map" or "wiped out" then yeah those headlines are trash.

  • Snakechapman [any]
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Can we get some remote sensing/ geography academic articles about instead of horrifying clickbait with stock photos and by side pictures from different locations?

    We can do better than Q-pilled boomers folks. If this is true , it should be well published. Better propaganda is made with verifiable facts than clickbait. We cant clickbait ourselves into a revolution.

    Edit: the whole desert didnt disappear and only greened a little bit actually. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ISPAr42.3.2127Y/abstract

      • Snakechapman [any]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        The more time I spend on cha.cha the less I believe

        • hauntingspectre [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Look, if we say our ideology is scientific, we don't have to apply critical thinking or evidence based inquiries to anything else.

    • TossedAccount [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Good point, I would love to see more evidence that these policies are doing what the headlines imply.

    • MonarchLabsOne [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      It's crazy that China is one of the only countries trying to do something about climate change and the West is still able to fear monger about them.

    • cresspacito [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I agree but also disagree, the right shows every day that you can just make shit up that sounds good, I think it's about tailoring to your audience. If I wanted to convert a load of dumb chuds, I wouldn't just straight make stuff up but I'd sensationalise the fuck out of propaganda. It's like when leftists debate conservatives, the right-wing viewers just want to see a lib get owned, they don't care about facts, which is why I want to see a leftist who is good at roasting people just straight bully Shapiro or Crowder. Maybe we can train one up, raise funds for an improv class lol

  • Rem [she/her]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Why are they doing an o face on the bottom 😳

  • hauntingspectre [he/him]
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 years ago

    Yes, fuck the natural world for existing, I guess? All the creatures and plants that evolved there are dumb!

    Seriously, there's a big difference between "reclaiming land lost due to desertification from climate change" and "hey, this desert has been here for millennia, let's change that".

  • margaretsnatcher2020 [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    is this forest as real as the one the sino-forest corporation defrauded everybody on?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Forest_Corporation

  • ancom20 [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Green Wall of China, aka "Three North Shelter Forest Program" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-North_Shelter_Forest_Program https://ecobnb.com/blog/2019/07/china-the-new-green-wall-which-will-stop-the-desert-advancing/ https://earthtalk.org/green-wall-china/